Worse than Random? An Embarrassingly Simple Probing Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models in Medical VQA

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20421v2
• Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:32:19 GMT
• Title: Worse than Random? An Embarrassingly Simple Probing Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models in Medical VQA
• Authors: Qianqi Yan, Xuehai He, Xiang Yue, Xin Eric Wang,
• Abstract summary: Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have shown remarkable progress in medical Visual Question Answering (Med-VQA) This study reveals that when subjected to simple probing evaluation, state-of-the-art models perform worse than random guessing on medical diagnosis questions.
• Score: 24.10436440624249
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have shown remarkable progress in medical Visual Question Answering (Med-VQA), achieving high accuracy on existing benchmarks. However, their reliability under robust evaluation is questionable. This study reveals that when subjected to simple probing evaluation, state-of-the-art models perform worse than random guessing on medical diagnosis questions. To address this critical evaluation problem, we introduce the Probing Evaluation for Medical Diagnosis (ProbMed) dataset to rigorously assess LMM performance in medical imaging through probing evaluation and procedural diagnosis. Particularly, probing evaluation features pairing original questions with negation questions with hallucinated attributes, while procedural diagnosis requires reasoning across various diagnostic dimensions for each image, including modality recognition, organ identification, clinical findings, abnormalities, and positional grounding. Our evaluation reveals that top-performing models like GPT-4o, GPT-4V, and Gemini Pro perform worse than random guessing on specialized diagnostic questions, indicating significant limitations in handling fine-grained medical inquiries. Besides, models like LLaVA-Med struggle even with more general questions, and results from CheXagent demonstrate the transferability of expertise across different modalities of the same organ, showing that specialized domain knowledge is still crucial for improving performance. This study underscores the urgent need for more robust evaluation to ensure the reliability of LMMs in critical fields like medical diagnosis, and current LMMs are still far from applicable to those fields.

Related papers

• MiniGPT-Med: Large Language Model as a General Interface for Radiology Diagnosis [28.421857904824627]
  MiniGPT-Med is a vision-language model derived from large-scale language models and tailored for medical applications. It is capable of performing tasks such as medical report generation, visual question answering (VQA), and disease identification within medical imagery. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on medical report generation, higher than the previous best model by 19% accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T18:21:10Z)
• RJUA-MedDQA: A Multimodal Benchmark for Medical Document Question Answering and Clinical Reasoning [14.366349078707263]
  RJUA-MedDQA is a comprehensive benchmark in the field of medical specialization. This work introduces RJUA-MedDQA, a comprehensive benchmark in the field of medical specialization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T06:57:02Z)
• Asclepius: A Spectrum Evaluation Benchmark for Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models [59.60384461302662]
  We introduce Asclepius, a novel benchmark for evaluating Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs) Asclepius rigorously and comprehensively assesses model capability in terms of distinct medical specialties and different diagnostic capacities. We also provide an in-depth analysis of 6 Med-MLLMs and compare them with 5 human specialists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T08:04:23Z)
• AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
  We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z)
• Rescuing referral failures during automated diagnosis of domain-shifted medical images [17.349847762608086]
  We show that even state-of-the-art domain generalization approaches fail severely during referral when tested on medical images acquired from a different demographic or using a different technology. We evaluate novel combinations of robust generalization and post hoc referral approaches, that rescue these failures and achieve significant performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T13:14:55Z)
• A Systematic Evaluation of GPT-4V's Multimodal Capability for Medical Image Analysis [87.25494411021066]
  GPT-4V's multimodal capability for medical image analysis is evaluated. It is found that GPT-4V excels in understanding medical images and generates high-quality radiology reports. It is found that its performance for medical visual grounding needs to be substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T11:39:09Z)
• An Automatic Evaluation Framework for Multi-turn Medical Consultations Capabilities of Large Language Models [22.409334091186995]
  Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucinations, leading to overly confident but incorrect judgments. This paper introduces an automated evaluation framework that assesses the practical capabilities of LLMs as virtual doctors during multi-turn consultations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T09:24:48Z)
• BMAD: Benchmarks for Medical Anomaly Detection [51.22159321912891]
  Anomaly detection (AD) is a fundamental research problem in machine learning and computer vision. In medical imaging, AD is especially vital for detecting and diagnosing anomalies that may indicate rare diseases or conditions. We introduce a comprehensive evaluation benchmark for assessing anomaly detection methods on medical images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T20:23:46Z)
• Scalable Online Disease Diagnosis via Multi-Model-Fused Actor-Critic Reinforcement Learning [9.274138493400436]
  For those seeking healthcare advice online, AI based dialogue agents capable of interacting with patients to perform automatic disease diagnosis are a viable option. This can be formulated as a problem of sequential feature (symptom) selection and classification for which reinforcement learning (RL) approaches have been proposed as a natural solution. We propose a Multi-Model-Fused Actor-Critic (MMF-AC) RL framework that consists of a generative actor network and a diagnostic critic network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T03:06:16Z)
• Hemogram Data as a Tool for Decision-making in COVID-19 Management: Applications to Resource Scarcity Scenarios [62.997667081978825]
  COVID-19 pandemics has challenged emergency response systems worldwide, with widespread reports of essential services breakdown and collapse of health care structure. This work describes a machine learning model derived from hemogram exam data performed in symptomatic patients. Proposed models can predict COVID-19 qRT-PCR results in symptomatic individuals with high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-10T01:45:03Z)
• Towards Causality-Aware Inferring: A Sequential Discriminative Approach for Medical Diagnosis [142.90770786804507]
  Medical diagnosis assistant (MDA) aims to build an interactive diagnostic agent to sequentially inquire about symptoms for discriminating diseases. This work attempts to address these critical issues in MDA by taking advantage of the causal diagram. We propose a propensity-based patient simulator to effectively answer unrecorded inquiry by drawing knowledge from the other records.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-14T02:05:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.