Large Language Model Sentinel: Advancing Adversarial Robustness by LLM Agent
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20770v1
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 07:23:56 GMT
- Title: Large Language Model Sentinel: Advancing Adversarial Robustness by LLM Agent
- Authors: Guang Lin, Qibin Zhao,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial attacks by some well-designed textual perturbations.
We introduce a novel defense technique named Large LAnguage MOdel Sentinel (LLAMOS) to enhance the adversarial robustness of LLMs.
- Score: 27.461127931996323
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Over the past two years, the use of large language models (LLMs) has advanced rapidly. While these LLMs offer considerable convenience, they also raise security concerns, as LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks by some well-designed textual perturbations. In this paper, we introduce a novel defense technique named Large LAnguage MOdel Sentinel (LLAMOS), which is designed to enhance the adversarial robustness of LLMs by purifying the adversarial textual examples before feeding them into the target LLM. Our method comprises two main components: a) Agent instruction, which can simulate a new agent for adversarial defense, altering minimal characters to maintain the original meaning of the sentence while defending against attacks; b) Defense guidance, which provides strategies for modifying clean or adversarial examples to ensure effective defense and accurate outputs from the target LLMs. Remarkably, the defense agent demonstrates robust defensive capabilities even without learning from adversarial examples. Additionally, we conduct an intriguing adversarial experiment where we develop two agents, one for defense and one for defense, and engage them in mutual confrontation. During the adversarial interactions, neither agent completely beat the other. Extensive experiments on both open-source and closed-source LLMs demonstrate that our method effectively defends against adversarial attacks, thereby enhancing adversarial robustness.
Related papers
- The Best Defense is a Good Offense: Countering LLM-Powered Cyberattacks [2.6528263069045126]
Large language models (LLMs) could soon become integral to autonomous cyber agents.
We introduce novel defense strategies that exploit the inherent vulnerabilities of attacking LLMs.
Our results show defense success rates of up to 90%, demonstrating the effectiveness of turning LLM vulnerabilities into defensive strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-20T14:07:24Z) - Defending against Reverse Preference Attacks is Difficult [26.872318173182414]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to training-time attacks such as supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on harmful datasets.
We propose Reverse Preference Attacks (RPA) to make LLMs learn harmful behavior using adversarial reward during reinforcement learning from human feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T17:10:34Z) - Purple-teaming LLMs with Adversarial Defender Training [57.535241000787416]
We present Purple-teaming LLMs with Adversarial Defender training (PAD)
PAD is a pipeline designed to safeguard LLMs by novelly incorporating the red-teaming (attack) and blue-teaming (safety training) techniques.
PAD significantly outperforms existing baselines in both finding effective attacks and establishing a robust safe guardrail.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T23:25:30Z) - Toward Optimal LLM Alignments Using Two-Player Games [86.39338084862324]
In this paper, we investigate alignment through the lens of two-agent games, involving iterative interactions between an adversarial and a defensive agent.
We theoretically demonstrate that this iterative reinforcement learning optimization converges to a Nash Equilibrium for the game induced by the agents.
Experimental results in safety scenarios demonstrate that learning in such a competitive environment not only fully trains agents but also leads to policies with enhanced generalization capabilities for both adversarial and defensive agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T15:24:50Z) - Adversarial Tuning: Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks for LLMs [13.317364896194903]
We propose a two-stage adversarial tuning framework to enhance Large Language Models' generalized defense capabilities.
In the first stage, we introduce the hierarchical meta-universal adversarial prompt learning to efficiently generate token-level adversarial prompts.
In the second stage, we propose the automatic adversarial prompt learning to iteratively refine semantic-level adversarial prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T15:37:15Z) - ASETF: A Novel Method for Jailbreak Attack on LLMs through Translate Suffix Embeddings [58.82536530615557]
We propose an Adversarial Suffix Embedding Translation Framework (ASETF) to transform continuous adversarial suffix embeddings into coherent and understandable text.
Our method significantly reduces the computation time of adversarial suffixes and achieves a much better attack success rate to existing techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T06:46:27Z) - Attack Prompt Generation for Red Teaming and Defending Large Language
Models [70.157691818224]
Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to red teaming attacks, which can induce LLMs to generate harmful content.
We propose an integrated approach that combines manual and automatic methods to economically generate high-quality attack prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T06:15:05Z) - Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language
Models [109.75753454188705]
Recent work shows that text moderations can produce jailbreaking prompts that bypass defenses.
We look at three types of defenses: detection (perplexity based), input preprocessing (paraphrase and retokenization), and adversarial training.
We find that the weakness of existing discretes for text, combined with the relatively high costs of optimization, makes standard adaptive attacks more challenging for LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-01T17:59:44Z) - Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models [114.36392560711022]
Large language models (LLMs) present significant safety and ethical risks if exploited by malicious users.
Recent works have proposed algorithms to detect LLM-generated text and protect LLMs.
We study two types of attack strategies: 1) replacing certain words in an LLM's output with their synonyms given the context; 2) automatically searching for an instructional prompt to alter the writing style of the generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T10:08:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.