clembench-2024: A Challenging, Dynamic, Complementary, Multilingual Benchmark and Underlying Flexible Framework for LLMs as Multi-Action Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20859v1
• Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:43:31 GMT
• Title: clembench-2024: A Challenging, Dynamic, Complementary, Multilingual Benchmark and Underlying Flexible Framework for LLMs as Multi-Action Agents
• Authors: Anne Beyer, Kranti Chalamalasetti, Sherzod Hakimov, Brielen Madureira, Philipp Sadler, David Schlangen,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models can be prompted to "self-play" conversational games that probe certain capabilities. We take one of the proposed frameworks for setting up such game-play environments, and test its usefulness as an evaluation instrument.
• Score: 19.989503513817095
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: It has been established in recent work that Large Language Models (LLMs) can be prompted to "self-play" conversational games that probe certain capabilities (general instruction following, strategic goal orientation, language understanding abilities), where the resulting interactive game play can be automatically scored. In this paper, we take one of the proposed frameworks for setting up such game-play environments, and further test its usefulness as an evaluation instrument, along a number of dimensions: We show that it can easily keep up with new developments while avoiding data contamination, we show that the tests implemented within it are not yet saturated (human performance is substantially higher than that of even the best models), and we show that it lends itself to investigating additional questions, such as the impact of the prompting language on performance. We believe that the approach forms a good basis for making decisions on model choice for building applied interactive systems, and perhaps ultimately setting up a closed-loop development environment of system and simulated evaluator.

Related papers

• Dynamic benchmarking framework for LLM-based conversational data capture [0.0]
  This paper introduces a benchmarking framework to assess large language models (LLMs) It integrates generative agent simulation to evaluate performance on key dimensions: information extraction, context awareness, and adaptive engagement. Results show that adaptive strategies improve data extraction accuracy, especially when handling ambiguous responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T15:47:47Z)
• Likelihood as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that likelihoods serve as an effective gauge for language model performance. We propose two methods that use question likelihood as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• LangSuitE: Planning, Controlling and Interacting with Large Language Models in Embodied Text Environments [70.91258869156353]
  We introduce LangSuitE, a versatile and simulation-free testbed featuring 6 representative embodied tasks in textual embodied worlds. Compared with previous LLM-based testbeds, LangSuitE offers adaptability to diverse environments without multiple simulation engines. We devise a novel chain-of-thought (CoT) schema, EmMem, which summarizes embodied states w.r.t. history information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T03:36:29Z)
• MEIA: Multimodal Embodied Perception and Interaction in Unknown Environments [82.67236400004826]
  We introduce the Multimodal Embodied Interactive Agent (MEIA), capable of translating high-level tasks expressed in natural language into a sequence of executable actions. MEM module enables MEIA to generate executable action plans based on diverse requirements and the robot's capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T02:43:20Z)
• Evaluating Language Model Agency through Negotiations [39.87262815823634]
  Negotiation games enable us to study multi-turn, and cross-model interactions, modulate complexity, and side-step accidental evaluation data leakage. We use our approach to test six widely used and publicly accessible LMs, evaluating performance and alignment in both self-play and cross-play settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T13:19:37Z)
• Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment [84.09815387884753]
  We propose a generative judge with 13B parameters, Auto-J, designed to address these challenges. Our model is trained on user queries and LLM-generated responses under massive real-world scenarios. Experimentally, Auto-J outperforms a series of strong competitors, including both open-source and closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T07:27:15Z)
• Dynamic-SUPERB: Towards A Dynamic, Collaborative, and Comprehensive Instruction-Tuning Benchmark for Speech [107.81472531864195]
  Text language models have shown remarkable zero-shot capability in generalizing to unseen tasks when provided with well-formulated instructions. We present Dynamic-SUPERB, a benchmark for building universal speech models capable of leveraging instruction tuning to perform multiple tasks in a zero-shot fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:43:30Z)
• Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate [95.10641301155232]
  We present a complementary approach to improve language responses where multiple language model instances propose and debate their individual responses and reasoning processes over multiple rounds to arrive at a common final answer. Our findings indicate that this approach significantly enhances mathematical and strategic reasoning across a number of tasks. Our approach may be directly applied to existing black-box models and uses identical procedure and prompts for all tasks we investigate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:55:11Z)
• Clembench: Using Game Play to Evaluate Chat-Optimized Language Models as Conversational Agents [20.202525145391093]
  Recent work has proposed a methodology for the systematic evaluation of "Situated Language Understanding Agents" This paper explores: Can Large Language Models be evaluated meaningfully by exposing them to constrained game-like settings? As a proof of concept, this paper investigates five interaction settings, showing that current chat-optimised LLMs are, to an extent, capable to follow game-play instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T19:56:10Z)
• Is MultiWOZ a Solved Task? An Interactive TOD Evaluation Framework with User Simulator [37.590563896382456]
  We propose an interactive evaluation framework for Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) systems. We first build a goal-oriented user simulator based on pre-trained models and then use the user simulator to interact with the dialogue system to generate dialogues. Experimental results show that RL-based TOD systems trained by our proposed user simulator can achieve nearly 98% inform and success rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T07:41:32Z)
• KGI: An Integrated Framework for Knowledge Intensive Language Tasks [16.511913995069097]
  In this paper, we propose a system based on an enhanced version of this approach for other knowledge intensive language tasks. Our system achieves results comparable to the best models in the KILT leaderboards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-08T10:36:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.