An Empirical Study of Developers' Challenges in Implementing Workflows as Code: A Case Study on Apache Airflow

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.00180v1
• Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 20:16:03 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Study of Developers' Challenges in Implementing Workflows as Code: A Case Study on Apache Airflow
• Authors: Jerin Yasmin, Jiale Wang, Yuan Tian, Bram Adams,
• Abstract summary: We study Stack Overflow posts derived from 9,591 Airflow-related questions to understand developers' challenges and root causes. We find that the most significant obstacles arise when defining and executing their workflow. Our analysis identifies 10 root causes behind the challenges, including incorrect configuration, complex environmental setup, and a lack of basic knowledge about Airflow and the external systems that it interacts with.
• Score: 9.189463227291377
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Workflows as Code paradigm is becoming increasingly essential to streamline the design and management of complex processes within data-intensive software systems. These systems require robust capabilities to process, analyze, and extract insights from large datasets. Workflow orchestration platforms such as Apache Airflow are pivotal in meeting these needs, as they effectively support the implementation of the Workflows as Code paradigm. Nevertheless, despite its considerable advantages, developers still face challenges due to the specialized demands of workflow orchestration and the complexities of distributed execution environments. In this paper, we manually study 1,000 sampled Stack Overflow posts derived from 9,591 Airflow-related questions to understand developers' challenges and root causes while implementing Workflows as Code. Our analysis results in a hierarchical taxonomy of Airflow-related challenges that contains 7 high-level categories and 14 sub-categories. We find that the most significant obstacles for developers arise when defining and executing their workflow. Our in-depth analysis identifies 10 root causes behind the challenges, including incorrect workflow configuration, complex environmental setup, and a lack of basic knowledge about Airflow and the external systems that it interacts with. Additionally, our analysis of references shared within the collected posts reveals that beyond the frequently cited Airflow documentation, documentation from external systems and third-party providers is also commonly referenced to address Airflow-related challenges.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation [80.74757493266057]
  We introduce WorFBench, a unified workflow generation benchmark with multi-faceted scenarios and intricate graph workflow structures. We also present WorFEval, a systemic evaluation protocol utilizing subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms. We observe that the generated can enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with less time during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T12:41:19Z)
• WorkflowHub: a registry for computational workflows [0.34864924310198164]
  As both combined records of analysis and descriptions of processing steps should be reusable, reusable, and available. Workflow sharing presents opportunities to reduce unnecessary reinvention, promote reuse, increase access to best practice analyses for non-experts, and increase productivity. Hub provides a unified registry for all computational registries that links to community repositories. The registry has a global reach, with hundreds of research organisations involved, and more than 700 registered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T14:36:27Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Agent Workflow Memory [71.81385627556398]
  We introduce Agent Memory, a method for inducing commonly reused routines. AWM substantially improves the baseline results by 24.6% and 51.1% relative success rate. Online AWM robustly generalizes in cross-task, website, and domain evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T17:21:00Z)
• Spider2-V: How Far Are Multimodal Agents From Automating Data Science and Engineering Workflows? [73.81908518992161]
  We introduce Spider2-V, the first multimodal agent benchmark focusing on professional data science and engineering. Spider2-V features real-world tasks in authentic computer environments and incorporating 20 enterprise-level professional applications. These tasks evaluate the ability of a multimodal agent to perform data-related tasks by writing code and managing the GUI in enterprise data software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T17:54:37Z)
• FlowBench: Revisiting and Benchmarking Workflow-Guided Planning for LLM-based Agents [64.1759086221016]
  We present FlowBench, the first benchmark for workflow-guided planning. FlowBench covers 51 different scenarios from 6 domains, with knowledge presented in diverse formats. Results indicate that current LLM agents need considerable improvements for satisfactory planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T06:13:00Z)
• High-level Stream Processing: A Complementary Analysis of Fault Recovery [1.3398445165628463]
  We focus on robust deployment setups inspired by requirements for near real-time analytics of a large cloud observability platform. The results indicate significant potential for improving fault recovery and performance. New abstractions for transparent configuration tuning are also needed for large-scale industry setups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T16:48:57Z)
• Large Language Models to the Rescue: Reducing the Complexity in Scientific Workflow Development Using ChatGPT [11.410608233274942]
  Scientific systems are increasingly popular for expressing and executing complex data analysis pipelines over large datasets. However, implementing is difficult due to the involvement of many blackbox tools and the deep infrastructure stack necessary for their execution. We investigate the efficiency of Large Language Models, specifically ChatGPT, to support users when dealing with scientific domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T10:28:53Z)
• Reusability Challenges of Scientific Workflows: A Case Study for Galaxy [56.78572674167333]
  This study examined the reusability of existing and exposed several challenges. The challenges preventing reusability include tool upgrading, tool support, design flaws, incomplete, failure to load a workflow, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T20:17:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.