Precision and Adaptability of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 in Dynamic Robotic Environments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.00315v1
• Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 06:17:43 GMT
• Title: Precision and Adaptability of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 in Dynamic Robotic Environments
• Authors: Victor A. Kich, Muhammad A. Muttaqien, Junya Toyama, Ryutaro Miyoshi, Yosuke Ida, Akihisa Ohya, Hisashi Date,
• Abstract summary: This study provides a comparative analysis of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 models. Contrary to initial expectations, YOLOv5 models demonstrated comparable, and in some cases superior, precision in object detection tasks.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advancements in real-time object detection frameworks have spurred extensive research into their application in robotic systems. This study provides a comparative analysis of YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 models, challenging the prevailing assumption of the latter's superiority in performance metrics. Contrary to initial expectations, YOLOv5 models demonstrated comparable, and in some cases superior, precision in object detection tasks. Our analysis delves into the underlying factors contributing to these findings, examining aspects such as model architecture complexity, training dataset variances, and real-world applicability. Through rigorous testing and an ablation study, we present a nuanced understanding of each model's capabilities, offering insights into the selection and optimization of object detection frameworks for robotic applications. Implications of this research extend to the design of more efficient and contextually adaptive systems, emphasizing the necessity for a holistic approach to evaluating model performance.

Related papers

• YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements [0.5639904484784127]
  The paper explores YOLOv11's expanded capabilities across various computer vision tasks, including object detection, instance segmentation, pose estimation, and oriented object detection (OBB) We review the model's performance improvements in terms of mean Average Precision (mAP) and computational efficiency compared to its predecessors, with a focus on the trade-off between parameter count and accuracy. Our research provides insights into YOLOv11's position within the broader landscape of object detection and its potential impact on real-time computer vision applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T09:55:22Z)
• Cutting-Edge Detection of Fatigue in Drivers: A Comparative Study of Object Detection Models [0.0]
  This research delves into the development of a fatigue detection system based on modern object detection algorithms, including YOLOv5, YOLOv6, YOLOv7, and YOLOv8. By comparing the performance of these models, we evaluate their effectiveness in real-time detection of fatigue-related behavior in drivers. The study addresses challenges like environmental variability and detection accuracy and suggests a roadmap for enhancing real-time detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T08:06:43Z)
• AI Foundation Models in Remote Sensing: A Survey [6.036426846159163]
  This paper provides a comprehensive survey of foundation models in the remote sensing domain. We categorize these models based on their applications in computer vision and domain-specific tasks. We highlight emerging trends and the significant advancements achieved by these foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T22:39:34Z)
• What is YOLOv5: A deep look into the internal features of the popular object detector [0.5639904484784127]
  The paper reviews the model's performance across various metrics and hardware platforms. Overall, this research provides insights into YOLOv5's capabilities and its position within the broader landscape of object detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T15:09:45Z)
• Innovative Horizons in Aerial Imagery: LSKNet Meets DiffusionDet for Advanced Object Detection [55.2480439325792]
  We present an in-depth evaluation of an object detection model that integrates the LSKNet backbone with the DiffusionDet head. The proposed model achieves a mean average precision (MAP) of approximately 45.7%, which is a significant improvement. This advancement underscores the effectiveness of the proposed modifications and sets a new benchmark in aerial image analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T19:49:13Z)
• From Static Benchmarks to Adaptive Testing: Psychometrics in AI Evaluation [60.14902811624433]
  We discuss a paradigm shift from static evaluation methods to adaptive testing. This involves estimating the characteristics and value of each test item in the benchmark and dynamically adjusting items in real-time. We analyze the current approaches, advantages, and underlying reasons for adopting psychometrics in AI evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T09:54:33Z)
• Robustness and Generalization Performance of Deep Learning Models on Cyber-Physical Systems: A Comparative Study [71.84852429039881]
  Investigation focuses on the models' ability to handle a range of perturbations, such as sensor faults and noise. We test the generalization and transfer learning capabilities of these models by exposing them to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T12:43:59Z)
• Adaptive Contextual Perception: How to Generalize to New Backgrounds and Ambiguous Objects [75.15563723169234]
  We investigate how vision models adaptively use context for out-of-distribution generalization. We show that models that excel in one setting tend to struggle in the other. To replicate the generalization abilities of biological vision, computer vision models must have factorized object vs. background representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T15:29:54Z)
• Enhancing object detection robustness: A synthetic and natural perturbation approach [2.5337932872891202]
  Robustness against real-world distribution shifts is crucial for the successful deployment of object detection models in practical applications. We analyze four state-of-the-art deep neural network models, Detr-ResNet-101, Detr-ResNet-50, YOLOv4, and YOLOv4-tiny, using the COCO 2017 dataset and ExDark dataset. Our comprehensive ablation study meticulously evaluates the impact of synthetic perturbations on object detection models performance against real-world distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T19:55:51Z)
• Models, Pixels, and Rewards: Evaluating Design Trade-offs in Visual Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [109.74041512359476]
  We study a number of design decisions for the predictive model in visual MBRL algorithms. We find that a range of design decisions that are often considered crucial, such as the use of latent spaces, have little effect on task performance. We show how this phenomenon is related to exploration and how some of the lower-scoring models on standard benchmarks will perform the same as the best-performing models when trained on the same training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T18:03:21Z)
• Goal-Aware Prediction: Learning to Model What Matters [105.43098326577434]
  One of the fundamental challenges in using a learned forward dynamics model is the mismatch between the objective of the learned model and that of the downstream planner or policy. We propose to direct prediction towards task relevant information, enabling the model to be aware of the current task and encouraging it to only model relevant quantities of the state space. We find that our method more effectively models the relevant parts of the scene conditioned on the goal, and as a result outperforms standard task-agnostic dynamics models and model-free reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T16:42:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.