A Risk Estimation Study of Native Code Vulnerabilities in Android Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02011v1
• Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:44:07 GMT
• Title: A Risk Estimation Study of Native Code Vulnerabilities in Android Applications
• Authors: Silvia Lucia Sanna, Diego Soi, Davide Maiorca, Giorgio Fumera, Giorgio Giacinto,
• Abstract summary: We propose a fast risk-based approach that provides a risk score related to the native part of an Android application. We show that many applications contain well-known vulnerabilities that miscreants can potentially exploit.
• Score: 1.6078134198754157
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Android is the most used Operating System worldwide for mobile devices, with hundreds of thousands of apps downloaded daily. Although these apps are primarily written in Java and Kotlin, advanced functionalities such as graphics or cryptography are provided through native C/C++ libraries. These libraries can be affected by common vulnerabilities in C/C++ code (e.g., memory errors such as buffer overflow), through which attackers can read/modify data or execute arbitrary code. The detection and assessment of vulnerabilities in Android native code have only been recently explored by previous research work. In this paper, we propose a fast risk-based approach that provides a risk score related to the native part of an Android application. In this way, before an app is released, the developer can check if the app may contain vulnerabilities in the Native Code and, if present, patch them to publish a more secure application. To this end, we first use fast regular expressions to detect library versions and possible vulnerable functions. Then, we apply scores extracted from a vulnerability database to the analyzed application, thus obtaining a risk score representative of the whole app. We demonstrate the validity of our approach by performing a large-scale analysis on more than $100,000$ applications (but only $40\%$ contained native code) and $15$ popular libraries carrying known vulnerabilities. The attained results show that many applications contain well-known vulnerabilities that miscreants can potentially exploit, posing serious concerns about the security of the whole Android applications landscape.

Related papers

• Assessing the Effectiveness of LLMs in Android Application Vulnerability Analysis [0.0]
  This study compares the ability of nine large language models (LLMs) to detect Android code vulnerabilities listed in the latest Open Worldwide Application Security Project (OWASP) Mobile Top 10. Our analysis reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each LLM, identifying important factors that contribute to their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T05:14:34Z)
• JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Models [123.66104233291065]
  Jailbreak attacks cause large language models (LLMs) to generate harmful, unethical, or otherwise objectionable content. evaluating these attacks presents a number of challenges, which the current collection of benchmarks and evaluation techniques do not adequately address. JailbreakBench is an open-sourced benchmark with the following components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T02:44:02Z)
• A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreaks [72.8807309802266]
  StrongREJECT is a high-quality benchmark for evaluating jailbreak performance. It scores the harmfulness of a victim model's responses to forbidden prompts. It achieves state-of-the-art agreement with human judgments of jailbreak effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T18:58:09Z)
• Finding Vulnerabilities in Mobile Application APIs: A Modular Programmatic Approach [0.0]
  Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are becoming increasingly popular to transfer data in a variety of mobile applications. These APIs often process sensitive user information through their endpoints, which are potentially exploitable due to developer mis implementation. This paper created a custom, modular endpoint vulnerability detection tool to analyze information leakage in various mobile Android applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T00:08:51Z)
• Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Codes [83.0342513054389]
  This work proposes a training-free approach for the detection of LLMs-generated codes. We find that existing training-based or zero-shot text detectors are ineffective in detecting code. Our method exhibits robustness against revision attacks and generalizes well to Java codes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T10:08:21Z)
• How well does LLM generate security tests? [8.454827764115631]
  Developers often build software on top of third-party libraries (Libs) to improve productivity and software quality. People refer to such attacks as supply chain attacks, the documented number of which has increased 742% in 2022. We used ChatGPT-4.0 to generate security tests, and to demonstrate how vulnerable library dependencies facilitate the supply chain attacks to given Apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T16:00:58Z)
• Demystifying RCE Vulnerabilities in LLM-Integrated Apps [20.01949990700702]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential across various downstream tasks. Some frameworks suffer from Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerabilities, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on apps' servers remotely via prompt injections. We present two novel strategies, including 1) a static analysis-based tool called LLMSmith to scan the source code of the framework to detect potential RCE vulnerabilities and 2) a prompt-based automated testing approach to verify the vulnerability in LLM-integrated web apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T11:39:37Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
• Mind the GAP: Security & Privacy Risks of Contact Tracing Apps [75.7995398006171]
  Google and Apple have jointly provided an API for exposure notification in order to implement decentralized contract tracing apps using Bluetooth Low Energy. We demonstrate that in real-world scenarios the GAP design is vulnerable to (i) profiling and possibly de-anonymizing persons, and (ii) relay-based wormhole attacks that basically can generate fake contacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T16:05:05Z)
• SeMA: Extending and Analyzing Storyboards to Develop Secure Android Apps [0.0]
  SeMA is a mobile app development methodology that builds on existing mobile app design artifacts such as storyboards. An evaluation of the effectiveness of SeMA shows the methodology can detect and help prevent 49 vulnerabilities known to occur in Android apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-27T20:10:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.