Language Models Do Hard Arithmetic Tasks Easily and Hardly Do Easy Arithmetic Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02356v1
• Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:34:39 GMT
• Title: Language Models Do Hard Arithmetic Tasks Easily and Hardly Do Easy Arithmetic Tasks
• Authors: Andrew Gambardella, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can correctly and confidently predict the first digit of n-digit by m-digit multiplication tasks. LLMs in practice often fail to correctly or confidently predict the last digit of an n-digit by m-digit multiplication. We show that the latter task can be solved more robustly when the LLM is conditioned on all of the correct higher-order digits.
• Score: 27.020990219204343
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The ability (and inability) of large language models (LLMs) to perform arithmetic tasks has been the subject of much theoretical and practical debate. We show that LLMs are frequently able to correctly and confidently predict the first digit of n-digit by m-digit multiplication tasks without using chain of thought reasoning, despite these tasks require compounding operations to solve. Simultaneously, LLMs in practice often fail to correctly or confidently predict the last digit of an n-digit by m-digit multiplication, a task equivalent to 1-digit by 1-digit multiplication which can be easily learned or memorized. We show that the latter task can be solved more robustly when the LLM is conditioned on all of the correct higher-order digits, which on average increases the confidence of the correct last digit on 5-digit by 5-digit multiplication tasks using Llama 2-13B by over 230% (0.13 to 0.43) and Mistral-7B by 150% (0.22 to 0.55).

Related papers

• Number Cookbook: Number Understanding of Language Models and How to Improve It [63.9542740221096]
  Large language models (LLMs) can solve an increasing number of complex reasoning tasks while making surprising mistakes in basic numerical understanding and processing. This paper comprehensively investigates the numerical understanding and processing ability (NUPA) of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T08:59:44Z)
• How Numerical Precision Affects Mathematical Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs [69.55103380185612]
  We identify numerical precision as a key factor that influences Transformer-based Large Language Models' effectiveness in mathematical tasks. Our results show that Transformers operating with low numerical precision fail to address arithmetic tasks, such as iterated addition and integer multiplication. In contrast, Transformers with standard numerical precision can efficiently handle these tasks with significantly smaller model sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:59:35Z)
• Executing Arithmetic: Fine-Tuning Large Language Models as Turing Machines [7.695524275630717]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of natural language processing and reasoning tasks. We propose a Composable Arithmetic Execution Framework (CAEF) that enables LLMs to learn to execute step-by-step computations by emulating Turing Machines. In our evaluation, CAEF achieves nearly 100% accuracy across seven common mathematical operations on the LLaMA 3.1-8B model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T13:23:49Z)
• Interpreting and Improving Large Language Models in Arithmetic Calculation [72.19753146621429]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential across numerous applications. In this work, we delve into uncovering a specific mechanism by which LLMs execute calculations. We investigate the potential benefits of selectively fine-tuning these essential heads/MLPs to boost the LLMs' computational performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T07:01:46Z)
• GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers [68.77382332826167]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various mathematical reasoning benchmarks. One essential and frequently occurring evidence is that when the math questions are slightly changed, LLMs can behave incorrectly. This motivates us to evaluate the robustness of LLMs' math reasoning capability by testing a wide range of question variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T15:26:14Z)
• Positional Description Matters for Transformers Arithmetic [58.4739272381373]
  Transformers often falter on arithmetic tasks despite their vast capabilities. We propose several ways to fix the issue, either by modifying the positional encoding directly, or by modifying the representation of the arithmetic task to leverage standard positional encoding differently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T00:31:01Z)
• GPT Can Solve Mathematical Problems Without a Calculator [24.114064917059565]
  We show that a large language model can accurately perform arithmetic operations with almost 100% accuracy without data leakage. We also demonstrate that our MathGLM, fine-tuned from GLM-10B, achieves similar performance to GPT-4 on a 5,000-samples Chinese math problem test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T06:18:16Z)
• MathPrompter: Mathematical Reasoning using Large Language Models [7.953723258038284]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have limited performance when solving arithmetic reasoning tasks. MathPrompter uses the Zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting technique to generate multiple Algebraic expressions or Python functions to solve the same math problem in different ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-04T04:43:49Z)
• PAL: Program-aided Language Models [112.94785609781503]
  We present Program-Aided Language models (PaL) to understand natural language problems. PaL offloads the solution step to a programmatic runtime such as a Python interpreter. We set new state-of-the-art results in all 12 benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T18:56:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.