Prediction-powered Generalization of Causal Inferences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02873v1
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 02:44:14 GMT
• Title: Prediction-powered Generalization of Causal Inferences
• Authors: Ilker Demirel, Ahmed Alaa, Anthony Philippakis, David Sontag,
• Abstract summary: We show how the limited size of trials makes generalization a statistically infeasible task. We develop generalization algorithms that supplement the trial data with a prediction model learned from an additional observational study.
• Score: 6.43357871718189
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Causal inferences from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) may not pertain to a target population where some effect modifiers have a different distribution. Prior work studies generalizing the results of a trial to a target population with no outcome but covariate data available. We show how the limited size of trials makes generalization a statistically infeasible task, as it requires estimating complex nuisance functions. We develop generalization algorithms that supplement the trial data with a prediction model learned from an additional observational study (OS), without making any assumptions on the OS. We theoretically and empirically show that our methods facilitate better generalization when the OS is high-quality, and remain robust when it is not, and e.g., have unmeasured confounding.

Related papers

• Effect-Invariant Mechanisms for Policy Generalization [3.701112941066256]
  It has been suggested to exploit invariant conditional distributions to learn models that generalize better to unseen environments. We introduce a relaxation of full invariance called effect-invariance and prove that it is sufficient, under suitable assumptions, for zero-shot policy generalization. We present empirical results using simulated data and a mobile health intervention dataset to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-19T14:50:24Z)
• Intervention Generalization: A View from Factor Graph Models [7.117681268784223]
  We take a close look at how to warrant a leap from past experiments to novel conditions based on minimal assumptions about the factorization of the distribution of the manipulated system. A postulated $textitinterventional factor model$ (IFM) may not always be informative, but it conveniently abstracts away a need for explicitly modeling unmeasured confounding and feedback mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T21:44:23Z)
• Learning Linear Causal Representations from Interventions under General Nonlinear Mixing [52.66151568785088]
  We prove strong identifiability results given unknown single-node interventions without access to the intervention targets. This is the first instance of causal identifiability from non-paired interventions for deep neural network embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T02:32:12Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Modeling Uncertain Feature Representation for Domain Generalization [49.129544670700525]
  We show that our method consistently improves the network generalization ability on multiple vision tasks. Our methods are simple yet effective and can be readily integrated into networks without additional trainable parameters or loss constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T14:25:02Z)
• Beyond Random Split for Assessing Statistical Model Performance [0.0]
  We analyze strategies based on predictors' variability to split in training and testing sets. Such strategies aim at guaranteeing the inclusion of rare or unusual examples with a minimal loss of the population's representativeness. Preliminary results showed the importance of applying the three alternative strategies to the Monte Carlo splitting strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T22:24:35Z)
• AdAUC: End-to-end Adversarial AUC Optimization Against Long-tail Problems [102.95119281306893]
  We present an early trial to explore adversarial training methods to optimize AUC. We reformulate the AUC optimization problem as a saddle point problem, where the objective becomes an instance-wise function. Our analysis differs from the existing studies since the algorithm is asked to generate adversarial examples by calculating the gradient of a min-max problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-24T09:13:39Z)
• Predicting Unreliable Predictions by Shattering a Neural Network [145.3823991041987]
  Piecewise linear neural networks can be split into subfunctions. Subfunctions have their own activation pattern, domain, and empirical error. Empirical error for the full network can be written as an expectation over subfunctions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T18:34:41Z)
• Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Training Deep Networks [83.44219640437657]
  Deep learning models are prone to learning spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. We propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observable confounders. We conduct experiments on two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T17:47:16Z)
• A Causal Direction Test for Heterogeneous Populations [10.653162005300608]
  Most causal models assume a single homogeneous population, an assumption that may fail to hold in many applications. We show that when the homogeneity assumption is violated, causal models developed based on such assumption can fail to identify the correct causal direction. We propose an adjustment to a commonly used causal direction test statistic by using a $k$-means type clustering algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T18:59:14Z)
• MissDeepCausal: Causal Inference from Incomplete Data Using Deep Latent Variable Models [14.173184309520453]
  State-of-the-art methods for causal inference don't consider missing values. Missing data require an adapted unconfoundedness hypothesis. Latent confounders whose distribution is learned through variational autoencoders adapted to missing values are considered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T12:58:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.