CAPRI-FAIR: Integration of Multi-sided Fairness in Contextual POI Recommendation Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03109v3
• Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:46:43 GMT
• Title: CAPRI-FAIR: Integration of Multi-sided Fairness in Contextual POI Recommendation Framework
• Authors: Francis Zac dela Cruz, Flora D. Salim, Yonchanok Khaokaew, Jeffrey Chan,
• Abstract summary: This paper develops a method that includes provider and consumer fairness in existing models. Experiments show that a linear scoring model for provider fairness in re-scoring items offers the best balance between performance and long-tail exposure.
• Score: 10.454880693923808
• License:
• Abstract: Point-of-interest (POI) recommendation considers spatio-temporal factors like distance, peak hours, and user check-ins. Given their influence on both consumer experience and POI business, it's crucial to consider fairness from multiple perspectives. Unfortunately, these systems often provide less accurate recommendations to inactive users and less exposure to unpopular POIs. This paper develops a post-filter method that includes provider and consumer fairness in existing models, aiming to balance fairness metrics like item exposure with performance metrics such as precision and distance. Experiments show that a linear scoring model for provider fairness in re-scoring items offers the best balance between performance and long-tail exposure, sometimes without much precision loss. Addressing consumer fairness by recommending more popular POIs to inactive users increased precision in some models and datasets. However, combinations that reached the Pareto front of consumer and provider fairness resulted in the lowest precision values, highlighting that tradeoffs depend greatly on the model and dataset.

Related papers

• Correcting for Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems via Item Loss Equalization [1.7771454131646311]
  A small set of popular items dominate the recommendation results due to their high interaction rates. This phenomenon disproportionately benefits users with mainstream tastes while neglecting those with niche interests. We propose an in-processing approach to address this issue by intervening in the training process of recommendation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T08:34:18Z)
• Bayes-enhanced Multi-view Attention Networks for Robust POI Recommendation [81.4999547454189]
  Existing works assume the available POI check-ins reported by users are the ground-truth depiction of user behaviors. In real application scenarios, the check-in data can be rather unreliable due to both subjective and objective causes. We propose a Bayes-enhanced Multi-view Attention Network to address the uncertainty factors of the user check-ins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T12:47:38Z)
• Off-policy evaluation for learning-to-rank via interpolating the item-position model and the position-based model [83.83064559894989]
  A critical need for industrial recommender systems is the ability to evaluate recommendation policies offline, before deploying them to production. We develop a new estimator that mitigates the problems of the two most popular off-policy estimators for rankings. In particular, the new estimator, called INTERPOL, addresses the bias of a potentially misspecified position-based model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T17:22:30Z)
• Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation [59.500347564280204]
  We propose a new Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation (AUR) framework. AUR consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model. As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T04:32:51Z)
• Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation [57.71258289870123]
  We develop a new learning paradigm named Cross Pairwise Ranking (CPR) CPR achieves unbiased recommendation without knowing the exposure mechanism. We prove in theory that this way offsets the influence of user/item propensity on the learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T09:20:27Z)
• The Unfairness of Active Users and Popularity Bias in Point-of-Interest Recommendation [4.578469978594752]
  This paper studies the interplay between (i) the unfairness of active users, (ii) the unfairness of popular items, and (iii) the accuracy of recommendation as three angles of our study triangle. For item fairness, we divide items into short-head, mid-tail, and long-tail groups and study the exposure of these item groups into the top-k recommendation list of users. Our study shows that most recommendation models cannot satisfy both consumer and producer fairness, indicating a trade-off between these variables possibly due to natural biases in data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T08:02:19Z)
• Deep Causal Reasoning for Recommendations [47.83224399498504]
  A new trend in recommender system research is to negate the influence of confounders from a causal perspective. We model the recommendation as a multi-cause multi-outcome (MCMO) inference problem. We show that MCMO modeling may lead to high variance due to scarce observations associated with the high-dimensional causal space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-06T15:00:01Z)
• Debiased Explainable Pairwise Ranking from Implicit Feedback [0.3867363075280543]
  We focus on the state of the art pairwise ranking model, Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) BPR is a black box model that does not explain its outputs, thus limiting the user's trust in the recommendations. We propose a novel explainable loss function and a corresponding Matrix Factorization-based model that generates recommendations along with item-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T17:19:37Z)
• A Graph-based Approach for Mitigating Multi-sided Exposure Bias in Recommender Systems [7.3129791870997085]
  We introduce FairMatch, a graph-based algorithm that improves exposure fairness for items and suppliers. A comprehensive set of experiments on two datasets and comparison with state-of-the-art baselines show that FairMatch, while significantly improves exposure fairness and aggregate diversity, maintains an acceptable level of relevance of the recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T18:01:26Z)
• PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User Satisfaction [76.98616102965023]
  We describe a novel Personalized Unexpected Recommender System (PURS) model that incorporates unexpectedness into the recommendation process. Extensive offline experiments on three real-world datasets illustrate that the proposed PURS model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T01:33:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.