PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User
Satisfaction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02771v1
- Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 01:33:21 GMT
- Title: PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User
Satisfaction
- Authors: Pan Li, Maofei Que, Zhichao Jiang, Yao Hu and Alexander Tuzhilin
- Abstract summary: We describe a novel Personalized Unexpected Recommender System (PURS) model that incorporates unexpectedness into the recommendation process.
Extensive offline experiments on three real-world datasets illustrate that the proposed PURS model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approaches.
- Score: 76.98616102965023
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Classical recommender system methods typically face the filter bubble problem
when users only receive recommendations of their familiar items, making them
bored and dissatisfied. To address the filter bubble problem, unexpected
recommendations have been proposed to recommend items significantly deviating
from user's prior expectations and thus surprising them by presenting "fresh"
and previously unexplored items to the users. In this paper, we describe a
novel Personalized Unexpected Recommender System (PURS) model that incorporates
unexpectedness into the recommendation process by providing multi-cluster
modeling of user interests in the latent space and personalized unexpectedness
via the self-attention mechanism and via selection of an appropriate unexpected
activation function. Extensive offline experiments on three real-world datasets
illustrate that the proposed PURS model significantly outperforms the
state-of-the-art baseline approaches in terms of both accuracy and
unexpectedness measures. In addition, we conduct an online A/B test at a major
video platform Alibaba-Youku, where our model achieves over 3\% increase in the
average video view per user metric. The proposed model is in the process of
being deployed by the company.
Related papers
- Preference Diffusion for Recommendation [50.8692409346126]
We propose PreferDiff, a tailored optimization objective for DM-based recommenders.
PreferDiff transforms BPR into a log-likelihood ranking objective to better capture user preferences.
It is the first personalized ranking loss designed specifically for DM-based recommenders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T01:02:04Z) - BHEISR: Nudging from Bias to Balance -- Promoting Belief Harmony by
Eliminating Ideological Segregation in Knowledge-based Recommendations [5.795636579831129]
The main objective is to strike a belief balance for users while minimizing the detrimental influence caused by filter bubbles.
The BHEISR model amalgamates principles from nudge theory while upholding democratic and transparent principles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-06T06:12:37Z) - Latent User Intent Modeling for Sequential Recommenders [92.66888409973495]
Sequential recommender models learn to predict the next items a user is likely to interact with based on his/her interaction history on the platform.
Most sequential recommenders however lack a higher-level understanding of user intents, which often drive user behaviors online.
Intent modeling is thus critical for understanding users and optimizing long-term user experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-17T19:00:24Z) - Recommendation with User Active Disclosing Willingness [20.306413327597603]
We study a novel recommendation paradigm, where the users are allowed to indicate their "willingness" on disclosing different behaviors.
We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our model on balancing the recommendation quality and user disclosing willingness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-25T04:43:40Z) - Off-policy evaluation for learning-to-rank via interpolating the
item-position model and the position-based model [83.83064559894989]
A critical need for industrial recommender systems is the ability to evaluate recommendation policies offline, before deploying them to production.
We develop a new estimator that mitigates the problems of the two most popular off-policy estimators for rankings.
In particular, the new estimator, called INTERPOL, addresses the bias of a potentially misspecified position-based model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-15T17:22:30Z) - Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendation [59.500347564280204]
We propose a new Aleatoric Uncertainty-aware Recommendation (AUR) framework.
AUR consists of a new uncertainty estimator along with a normal recommender model.
As the chance of mislabeling reflects the potential of a pair, AUR makes recommendations according to the uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-22T04:32:51Z) - Application of Machine Learning for Online Reputation Systems [0.4125187280299248]
This paper proposes a new reputation system using machine learning to predict reliability of consumers from consumer profile.
The proposed model has been evaluated over three MovieLens benchmarking datasets, using 10-Folds cross validation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-10T12:31:40Z) - Generating Self-Serendipity Preference in Recommender Systems for
Addressing Cold Start Problems [9.281057513518498]
serendipity-oriented recommender system generates users' self-serendipity preferences to enhance recommendation performance.
Model extracts users' interest and satisfaction preferences, generates virtual but convincible neighbors' preferences from themselves, and achieves their self-serendipity preference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-27T01:29:47Z) - Latent Unexpected Recommendations [89.2011481379093]
We propose to model unexpectedness in the latent space of user and item embeddings, which allows to capture hidden and complex relations between new recommendations and historic purchases.
In addition, we develop a novel Latent Closure (LC) method to construct hybrid utility function and provide unexpected recommendations based on the proposed model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-27T02:39:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.