Gaussian Copula Models for Nonignorable Missing Data Using Auxiliary Marginal Quantiles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03463v1
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 17:11:59 GMT
• Title: Gaussian Copula Models for Nonignorable Missing Data Using Auxiliary Marginal Quantiles
• Authors: Joseph Feldman, Jerome P. Reiter, Daniel R. Kowal,
• Abstract summary: We develop algorithms for estimation and imputation that are computationally efficient. We apply the model to analyze associations between lead exposure levels and end-of-grade test scores for 170,000 students in North Carolina.
• Score: 2.867517731896504
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present an approach for modeling and imputation of nonignorable missing data under Gaussian copulas. The analyst posits a set of quantiles of the marginal distributions of the study variables, for example, reflecting information from external data sources or elicited expert opinion. When these quantiles are accurately specified, we prove it is possible to consistently estimate the copula correlation and perform multiple imputation in the presence of nonignorable missing data. We develop algorithms for estimation and imputation that are computationally efficient, which we evaluate in simulation studies of multiple imputation inferences. We apply the model to analyze associations between lead exposure levels and end-of-grade test scores for 170,000 students in North Carolina. These measurements are not missing at random, as children deemed at-risk for high lead exposure are more likely to be measured. We construct plausible marginal quantiles for lead exposure using national statistics provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Complete cases and missing at random analyses appear to underestimate the relationships between certain variables and end-of-grade test scores, while multiple imputation inferences under our model support stronger adverse associations between lead exposure and educational outcomes.

Related papers

• Risk and cross validation in ridge regression with correlated samples [72.59731158970894]
  We provide training examples for the in- and out-of-sample risks of ridge regression when the data points have arbitrary correlations. We further extend our analysis to the case where the test point has non-trivial correlations with the training set, setting often encountered in time series forecasting. We validate our theory across a variety of high dimensional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T17:27:29Z)
• Bayesian Federated Inference for regression models based on non-shared multicenter data sets from heterogeneous populations [0.0]
  In a regression model, the sample size must be large enough relative to the number of possible predictors. Pooling data from different data sets collected in different (medical) centers would alleviate this problem, but is often not feasible due to privacy regulation or logistic problems. An alternative route would be to analyze the local data in the centers separately and combine the statistical inference results with the Bayesian Federated Inference (BFI) methodology. The aim of this approach is to compute from the inference results in separate centers what would have been found if the statistical analysis was performed on the combined data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T11:10:27Z)
• Bayesian Quantile Regression with Subset Selection: A Posterior Summarization Perspective [0.0]
  Quantile regression is a powerful tool in epidemiological studies where interest lies in inferring how different exposures affect specific percentiles of the distribution of a health or life outcome. Existing methods either estimate conditional quantiles separately for each quantile of interest or estimate the entire conditional distribution using semi- or non-parametric models. We pose the fundamental problems of linear quantile estimation, uncertainty quantification, and subset selection from a Bayesian decision analysis perspective. Our approach introduces a quantile-focused squared error loss, which enables efficient, closed-form computing and maintains a close relationship with Wasserstein-based density estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T17:19:31Z)
• Equivariance Allows Handling Multiple Nuisance Variables When Analyzing Pooled Neuroimaging Datasets [53.34152466646884]
  In this paper, we show how bringing recent results on equivariant representation learning instantiated on structured spaces together with simple use of classical results on causal inference provides an effective practical solution. We demonstrate how our model allows dealing with more than one nuisance variable under some assumptions and can enable analysis of pooled scientific datasets in scenarios that would otherwise entail removing a large portion of the samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T04:54:06Z)
• Potential sources of dataset bias complicate investigation of underdiagnosis by machine learning algorithms [20.50071537200745]
  Seyyed-Kalantari et al. find that models trained on three chest X-ray datasets yield disparities in false-positive rates. The study concludes that the models exhibit and potentially even amplify systematic underdiagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-19T20:51:38Z)
• Statistical quantification of confounding bias in predictive modelling [0.0]
  I propose the partial and full confounder tests, which probe the null hypotheses of unconfounded and fully confounded models. The tests provide a strict control for Type I errors and high statistical power, even for non-normally and non-linearly dependent predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T10:35:24Z)
• RIFLE: Imputation and Robust Inference from Low Order Marginals [10.082738539201804]
  We develop a statistical inference framework for regression and classification in the presence of missing data without imputation. Our framework, RIFLE, estimates low-order moments of the underlying data distribution with corresponding confidence intervals to learn a distributionally robust model. Our experiments demonstrate that RIFLE outperforms other benchmark algorithms when the percentage of missing values is high and/or when the number of data points is relatively small.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T23:17:30Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)
• On Disentangled Representations Learned From Correlated Data [59.41587388303554]
  We bridge the gap to real-world scenarios by analyzing the behavior of the most prominent disentanglement approaches on correlated data. We show that systematically induced correlations in the dataset are being learned and reflected in the latent representations. We also demonstrate how to resolve these latent correlations, either using weak supervision during training or by post-hoc correcting a pre-trained model with a small number of labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T12:47:34Z)
• An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlations [98.3066727301239]
  We identify two key properties of the training data that drive this behavior. We show how the inductive bias of models towards "memorizing" fewer examples can cause over parameterization to hurt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T01:59:13Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.