Discovering Bias in Latent Space: An Unsupervised Debiasing Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03631v1
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:29:09 GMT
• Title: Discovering Bias in Latent Space: An Unsupervised Debiasing Approach
• Abstract summary: Question-answering capabilities of foundation models are highly sensitive to prompt variations. We propose to rectify this bias directly in the model's internal representation. We empirically show that SteerFair significantly reduces instruction-tuned model performance variance across prompt modifications.
• Score: 6.67121343477106
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The question-answering (QA) capabilities of foundation models are highly sensitive to prompt variations, rendering their performance susceptible to superficial, non-meaning-altering changes. This vulnerability often stems from the model's preference or bias towards specific input characteristics, such as option position or superficial image features in multi-modal settings. We propose to rectify this bias directly in the model's internal representation. Our approach, SteerFair, finds the bias direction in the model's representation space and steers activation values away from it during inference. Specifically, we exploit the observation that bias often adheres to simple association rules, such as the spurious association between the first option and correctness likelihood. Next, we construct demonstrations of these rules from unlabeled samples and use them to identify the bias directions. We empirically show that SteerFair significantly reduces instruction-tuned model performance variance across prompt modifications on three benchmark tasks. Remarkably, our approach surpasses a supervised baseline with 100 labels by an average of 10.86% accuracy points and 12.95 score points and matches the performance with 500 labels.

Related papers

• How Does Alignment Tuning Shape Representations of Sycophancy and Related Cue-Induced Biases in LLMs? [53.58941416780391]
  We study where this susceptibility, spanning sycophancy and related cue-induced biases, lives inside the model.<n>We extract a per-bias direction from hidden states and triangulate it through three measures: probing, leave-one-dataset-out transfer, and causal intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T16:10:06Z)
• Dual-Branch Cross-Projection Debiasing through Diffusion-based Disentanglement [66.67463557274358]
  Foundation models trained on biased datasets often rely on spurious correlations between target labels and non-causal attributes.<n>We introduce Confidence-guided Concept Mining (CBCM) to identify reliable spurious attributes without attribute annotations.<n>We propose Dual-branch Cross-projection Debiasing (DCD), a prompt-tuning framework that separates target and spurious representations into two branches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T05:28:47Z)
• Bias Leaves a Gradient Trail: Label-Free Bias Identification via Gradient Probes on Concept Decompositions [8.894428198928333]
  We present a bias-label-free, post-hoc method for identifying spurious concepts in frozen vision models.<n>On Colored MNIST and Waterbirds the method recovers concepts aligned with the known spurious cue.<n> suppressing the top-ranked concepts at inference time improves worst-group accuracy by up to 17.9 percentage points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-27T17:39:10Z)
• Towards Fairness under Label Bias in Image Segmentation: Impact, Measurement and Mitigation [10.15221228043609]
  Labeled datasets reflect the biases of their annotation pipelines, which sometimes introduce label bias.<n>We present a data-centric adaptation of Confident Learning to segmentation, allowing detection of label bias directly in the training data.<n>We show how our framework reliably detects and mitigates bias without access to clean labels, achieving equitable performance across experimental conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T19:47:50Z)
• Let Samples Speak: Mitigating Spurious Correlation by Exploiting the Clusterness of Samples [11.727747752958436]
  Deep learning models often learn features that spuriously correlate with the class label during training but are irrelevant to the prediction task.<n>Existing methods typically address this issue by annotating potential spurious attributes, or filtering spurious features based on some empirical assumptions.<n>We propose a data-oriented approach to mitigate the spurious correlation in deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-28T10:54:51Z)
• Adaptive Generation of Bias-Eliciting Questions for LLMs [18.608477560948003]
  Large language models (LLMs) are now widely deployed in user-facing applications, reaching hundreds of millions worldwide.<n>We introduce a counterfactual bias evaluation framework that automatically generates realistic, open-ended questions over sensitive attributes such as sex, race, or religion.<n>We also capture distinct response dimensions that are increasingly relevant in user interactions, such as asymmetric refusals and explicit acknowledgment of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T13:08:10Z)
• BLADE: Bias-Linked Adaptive DEbiasing [2.7352017408152083]
  BLADE is a generative debiasing framework that requires no prior knowledge of bias or bias-conflicting samples.<n>We evaluate BLADE on multiple benchmark datasets and show that it significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T12:28:54Z)
• CosFairNet:A Parameter-Space based Approach for Bias Free Learning [1.9116784879310025]
  Deep neural networks trained on biased data often inadvertently learn unintended inference rules. We introduce a novel approach to address bias directly in the model's parameter space, preventing its propagation across layers. We show enhanced classification accuracy and debiasing effectiveness across various synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T13:06:40Z)
• Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection [11.113718994341733]
  Deep neural networks are sensitive to bias in the data. We propose a new bias identification method based on anomaly detection. We reach state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T17:30:21Z)
• Eliminating Position Bias of Language Models: A Mechanistic Approach [119.34143323054143]
  Position bias has proven to be a prevalent issue of modern language models (LMs) Our mechanistic analysis attributes the position bias to two components employed in nearly all state-of-the-art LMs: causal attention and relative positional encodings. By eliminating position bias, models achieve better performance and reliability in downstream tasks, including LM-as-a-judge, retrieval-augmented QA, molecule generation, and math reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T09:06:57Z)
• Enhancing Intrinsic Features for Debiasing via Investigating Class-Discerning Common Attributes in Bias-Contrastive Pair [36.221761997349795]
  Deep neural networks rely on bias attributes that are spuriously correlated with a target class in the presence of dataset bias. This paper proposes a method that provides the model with explicit spatial guidance that indicates the region of intrinsic features. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real-world datasets with various levels of bias severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T04:13:14Z)
• Take Care of Your Prompt Bias! Investigating and Mitigating Prompt Bias in Factual Knowledge Extraction [56.17020601803071]
  Recent research shows that pre-trained language models (PLMs) suffer from "prompt bias" in factual knowledge extraction. This paper aims to improve the reliability of existing benchmarks by thoroughly investigating and mitigating prompt bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T02:04:35Z)
• Causality and Independence Enhancement for Biased Node Classification [56.38828085943763]
  We propose a novel Causality and Independence Enhancement (CIE) framework, applicable to various graph neural networks (GNNs) Our approach estimates causal and spurious features at the node representation level and mitigates the influence of spurious correlations. Our approach CIE not only significantly enhances the performance of GNNs but outperforms state-of-the-art debiased node classification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T13:56:24Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• Self-supervised debiasing using low rank regularization [59.84695042540525]
  Spurious correlations can cause strong biases in deep neural networks, impairing generalization ability. We propose a self-supervised debiasing framework potentially compatible with unlabeled samples. Remarkably, the proposed debiasing framework significantly improves the generalization performance of self-supervised learning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T08:26:19Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Learning Debiased Models with Dynamic Gradient Alignment and Bias-conflicting Sample Mining [39.00256193731365]
  Deep neural networks notoriously suffer from dataset biases which are detrimental to model robustness, generalization and fairness. We propose a two-stage debiasing scheme to combat against the intractable unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T14:50:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.