reAnalyst: Scalable Analysis of Reverse Engineering Activities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04427v1
• Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 18:14:14 GMT
• Title: reAnalyst: Scalable Analysis of Reverse Engineering Activities
• Authors: Tab Zhang, Claire Taylor, Bart Coppens, Waleed Mebane, Christian Collberg, Bjorn De Sutter,
• Abstract summary: reAnalyst is a scalable analysis framework designed to facilitate the study of reverse engineering (RE) practices. By integrating tool-agnostic data collection of screenshots, keystrokes, active processes, reAnalyst aims to overcome the limitations of traditional RE studies.
• Score: 3.0083213208912865
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces reAnalyst, a scalable analysis framework designed to facilitate the study of reverse engineering (RE) practices through the semi-automated annotation of RE activities across various RE tools. By integrating tool-agnostic data collection of screenshots, keystrokes, active processes, and other types of data during RE experiments with semi-automated data analysis and annotation, reAnalyst aims to overcome the limitations of traditional RE studies that rely heavily on manual data collection and subjective analysis. The framework enables more efficient data analysis, allowing researchers to explore the effectiveness of protection techniques and strategies used by reverse engineers more comprehensively and efficiently. Experimental evaluations validate the framework's capability to identify RE activities from a diverse range of screenshots with varied complexities, thereby simplifying the analysis process and supporting more effective research outcomes.

Related papers

• From Exploration to Mastery: Enabling LLMs to Master Tools via Self-Driven Interactions [60.733557487886635]
  This paper focuses on bridging the comprehension gap between Large Language Models and external tools. We propose a novel framework, DRAFT, aimed at Dynamically refining tool documentation. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate that DRAFT's iterative, feedback-based refinement significantly ameliorates documentation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:58:44Z)
• Causal Inference Tools for a Better Evaluation of Machine Learning [0.0]
  We introduce key statistical methods such as Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and logistic regression. The document serves as a guide for researchers and practitioners, detailing how these techniques can provide deeper insights into model behavior, performance, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T10:03:29Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Exploring Information Retrieval Landscapes: An Investigation of a Novel Evaluation Techniques and Comparative Document Splitting Methods [0.0]
  In this study, the structured nature of textbooks, the conciseness of articles, and the narrative complexity of novels are shown to require distinct retrieval strategies. A novel evaluation technique is introduced, utilizing an open-source model to generate a comprehensive dataset of question-and-answer pairs. The evaluation employs weighted scoring metrics, including SequenceMatcher, BLEU, METEOR, and BERT Score, to assess the system's accuracy and relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T02:08:47Z)
• InsightBench: Evaluating Business Analytics Agents Through Multi-Step Insight Generation [79.09622602860703]
  We introduce InsightBench, a benchmark dataset with three key features. It consists of 100 datasets representing diverse business use cases such as finance and incident management. Unlike existing benchmarks focusing on answering single queries, InsightBench evaluates agents based on their ability to perform end-to-end data analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T22:06:09Z)
• Benchmarking Data Science Agents [11.582116078653968]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising aids as data science agents, assisting humans in data analysis and processing. Yet their practical efficacy remains constrained by the varied demands of real-world applications and complicated analytical process. We introduce DSEval -- a novel evaluation paradigm, as well as a series of innovative benchmarks tailored for assessing the performance of these agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T03:03:06Z)
• TRIAGE: Characterizing and auditing training data for improved regression [80.11415390605215]
  We introduce TRIAGE, a novel data characterization framework tailored to regression tasks and compatible with a broad class of regressors. TRIAGE utilizes conformal predictive distributions to provide a model-agnostic scoring method, the TRIAGE score. We show that TRIAGE's characterization is consistent and highlight its utility to improve performance via data sculpting/filtering, in multiple regression settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T10:31:59Z)
• Reinforced Approximate Exploratory Data Analysis [7.974685452145769]
  We are first to consider the impact of sampling in interactive data exploration settings as they introduce approximation errors. We propose a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) based framework which can optimize the sample selection in order to keep the analysis and insight generation flow intact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T20:20:22Z)
• Distributed intelligence on the Edge-to-Cloud Continuum: A systematic literature review [62.997667081978825]
  This review aims at providing a comprehensive vision of the main state-of-the-art libraries and frameworks for machine learning and data analytics available today. The main simulation, emulation, deployment systems, and testbeds for experimental research on the Edge-to-Cloud Continuum available today are also surveyed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T08:06:05Z)
• Interactive Dimensionality Reduction for Comparative Analysis [28.52130400665133]
  We introduce an interactive DR framework where we integrate our new DR method, called ULCA, with an interactive visual interface. ULCA unifies two DR schemes, discriminant analysis and contrastive learning, to support various comparative analysis tasks. We develop an optimization algorithm that enables analysts to interactively refine ULCA results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T15:05:36Z)
• SAMBA: Safe Model-Based & Active Reinforcement Learning [59.01424351231993]
  SAMBA is a framework for safe reinforcement learning that combines aspects from probabilistic modelling, information theory, and statistics. We evaluate our algorithm on a variety of safe dynamical system benchmarks involving both low and high-dimensional state representations. We provide intuition as to the effectiveness of the framework by a detailed analysis of our active metrics and safety constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T10:40:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.