Can I understand what I create? Self-Knowledge Evaluation of Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06140v1
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:53:54 GMT
- Title: Can I understand what I create? Self-Knowledge Evaluation of Large Language Models
- Authors: Zhiquan Tan, Lai Wei, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Weiran Huang,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in linguistic tasks.
Inspired by Feynman's principle of understanding through creation, we introduce a self-knowledge evaluation framework.
- Score: 31.85129258347539
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in linguistic tasks, necessitating robust evaluation frameworks to understand their capabilities and limitations. Inspired by Feynman's principle of understanding through creation, we introduce a self-knowledge evaluation framework that is easy to implement, evaluating models on their ability to comprehend and respond to self-generated questions. Our findings, based on testing multiple models across diverse tasks, reveal significant gaps in the model's self-knowledge ability. Further analysis indicates these gaps may be due to misalignment with human attention mechanisms. Additionally, fine-tuning on self-generated math task may enhance the model's math performance, highlighting the potential of the framework for efficient and insightful model evaluation and may also contribute to the improvement of LLMs.
Related papers
- Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology [76.64402390208576]
Modern language models (LMs) pose a new challenge in capability assessment.
To be confident in our metrics, we need a new discipline of model metrology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T17:52:12Z) - Estimating Knowledge in Large Language Models Without Generating a Single Token [12.913172023910203]
Current methods to evaluate knowledge in large language models (LLMs) query the model and then evaluate its generated responses.
In this work, we ask whether evaluation can be done before the model has generated any text.
Experiments with a variety of LLMs show that KEEN, a simple probe trained over internal subject representations, succeeds at both tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T14:45:50Z) - Verbalized Probabilistic Graphical Modeling with Large Language Models [8.961720262676195]
This work introduces a novel Bayesian prompting approach that facilitates training-free Bayesian inference with large language models.
Our results indicate that the model effectively enhances confidence elicitation and text generation quality, demonstrating its potential to improve AI language understanding systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-08T16:35:31Z) - CLOMO: Counterfactual Logical Modification with Large Language Models [109.60793869938534]
We introduce a novel task, Counterfactual Logical Modification (CLOMO), and a high-quality human-annotated benchmark.
In this task, LLMs must adeptly alter a given argumentative text to uphold a predetermined logical relationship.
We propose an innovative evaluation metric, the Self-Evaluation Score (SES), to directly evaluate the natural language output of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-29T08:29:54Z) - L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large
Language Models [102.00201523306986]
We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods.
In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z) - Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A
Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text.
Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z) - INSTRUCTEVAL: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Instruction-Tuned Large
Language Models [39.46610170563634]
INSTRUCTEVAL is a more comprehensive evaluation suite designed specifically for instruction-tuned large language models.
We take a holistic approach to analyze various factors affecting model performance, including the pretraining foundation, instruction-tuning data, and training methods.
Our findings reveal that the quality of instruction data is the most crucial factor in scaling model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T20:12:29Z) - Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know? [74.65014158544011]
Large language models (LLMs) have a wealth of knowledge that allows them to excel in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks.
Despite their vast knowledge, LLMs are still limited by the amount of information they can accommodate and comprehend.
This study aims to evaluate LLMs' self-knowledge by assessing their ability to identify unanswerable or unknowable questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T15:30:13Z) - Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent
Debate [95.10641301155232]
We present a complementary approach to improve language responses where multiple language model instances propose and debate their individual responses and reasoning processes over multiple rounds to arrive at a common final answer.
Our findings indicate that this approach significantly enhances mathematical and strategic reasoning across a number of tasks.
Our approach may be directly applied to existing black-box models and uses identical procedure and prompts for all tasks we investigate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T17:55:11Z) - Post Hoc Explanations of Language Models Can Improve Language Models [43.2109029463221]
We present a novel framework, Amplifying Model Performance by Leveraging In-Context Learning with Post Hoc Explanations (AMPLIFY)
We leverage post hoc explanation methods which output attribution scores (explanations) capturing the influence of each of the input features on model predictions.
Our framework, AMPLIFY, leads to prediction accuracy improvements of about 10-25% over a wide range of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T04:46:04Z) - Evaluating Explainability in Machine Learning Predictions through Explainer-Agnostic Metrics [0.0]
We develop six distinct model-agnostic metrics designed to quantify the extent to which model predictions can be explained.
These metrics measure different aspects of model explainability, ranging from local importance, global importance, and surrogate predictions.
We demonstrate the practical utility of these metrics on classification and regression tasks, and integrate these metrics into an existing Python package for public use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T15:28:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.