Language Models Resist Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06144v2
• Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:46:14 GMT
• Title: Language Models Resist Alignment
• Authors: Jiaming Ji, Kaile Wang, Tianyi Qiu, Boyuan Chen, Jiayi Zhou, Changye Li, Hantao Lou, Yaodong Yang,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) may exhibit undesirable behaviors. Recent efforts have focused on aligning these models to prevent harmful generation. We show that fine-tuning process disproportionately undermines alignment compared to pre-training.
• Score: 8.4506780540122
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) may exhibit undesirable behaviors. Recent efforts have focused on aligning these models to prevent harmful generation. Despite these efforts, studies have shown that even a well-conducted alignment process can be easily circumvented, whether intentionally or accidentally. Do alignment fine-tuning have robust effects on models, or are merely superficial? In this work, we answer this question through both theoretical and empirical means. Empirically, we demonstrate the elasticity of post-alignment models, i.e., the tendency to revert to the behavior distribution formed during the pre-training phase upon further fine-tuning. Using compression theory, we formally derive that such fine-tuning process disproportionately undermines alignment compared to pre-training, potentially by orders of magnitude. We conduct experimental validations to confirm the presence of elasticity across models of varying types and sizes. Specifically, we find that model performance declines rapidly before reverting to the pre-training distribution, after which the rate of decline drops significantly. We further reveal that elasticity positively correlates with increased model size and the expansion of pre-training data. Our discovery signifies the importance of taming the inherent elasticity of LLMs, thereby overcoming the resistance of LLMs to alignment finetuning.

Related papers

• Causal Lifting of Neural Representations: Zero-Shot Generalization for Causal Inferences [56.23412698865433]
  We focus on causal inferences on a target experiment with unlabeled factual outcomes, retrieved by a predictive model fine-tuned on a labeled similar experiment. First, we show that factual outcome estimation via Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) may fail to yield valid causal inferences on the target population. We propose Deconfounded Empirical Risk Minimization (DERM), a new simple learning procedure minimizing the risk over a fictitious target population.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T10:52:17Z)
• Strong Model Collapse [16.071600606637908]
  We consider a supervised regression setting and establish the existance of a strong form of the model collapse phenomenon. Our results show that even the smallest fraction of synthetic data can lead to model collapse. We investigate whether increasing model size, an approach aligned with current trends in training large language models, exacerbates or mitigates model collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T08:54:23Z)
• Causal Estimation of Memorisation Profiles [58.20086589761273]
  Understanding memorisation in language models has practical and societal implications. Memorisation is the causal effect of training with an instance on the model's ability to predict that instance. This paper proposes a new, principled, and efficient method to estimate memorisation based on the difference-in-differences design from econometrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:59:09Z)
• Low-rank finetuning for LLMs: A fairness perspective [54.13240282850982]
  Low-rank approximation techniques have become the de facto standard for fine-tuning Large Language Models. This paper investigates the effectiveness of these methods in capturing the shift of fine-tuning datasets from the initial pre-trained data distribution. We show that low-rank fine-tuning inadvertently preserves undesirable biases and toxic behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T20:43:53Z)
• Post-Hoc Reversal: Are We Selecting Models Prematurely? [13.910702424593797]
  We show a phenomenon that we call post-hoc reversal, where performance trends are reversed after applying post-hoc transforms. Preliminary analyses suggest that these transforms induce reversal by suppressing the influence of mislabeled examples. We propose post-hoc selection, a simple technique whereby post-hoc metrics inform model development decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T14:58:19Z)
• Selective Learning: Towards Robust Calibration with Dynamic Regularization [79.92633587914659]
  Miscalibration in deep learning refers to there is a discrepancy between the predicted confidence and performance. We introduce Dynamic Regularization (DReg) which aims to learn what should be learned during training thereby circumventing the confidence adjusting trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T11:25:20Z)
• Model Collapse Demystified: The Case of Regression [12.115359951879462]
  We study the phenomenon of "model collapse" in the era of proliferation of large language and image generation models. We obtain analytic formulae which quantitatively outline this phenomenon in a broad range of regimes. We propose a simple strategy based on adaptive regularization to mitigate model collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T15:26:01Z)
• On the Dynamics Under the Unhinged Loss and Beyond [104.49565602940699]
  We introduce the unhinged loss, a concise loss function, that offers more mathematical opportunities to analyze closed-form dynamics. The unhinged loss allows for considering more practical techniques, such as time-vary learning rates and feature normalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T02:11:07Z)
• A PAC-Bayesian Perspective on the Interpolating Information Criterion [54.548058449535155]
  We show how a PAC-Bayes bound is obtained for a general class of models, characterizing factors which influence performance in the interpolating regime. We quantify how the test error for overparameterized models achieving effectively zero training error depends on the quality of the implicit regularization imposed by e.g. the combination of model, parameter-initialization scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T01:48:08Z)
• Bias in Pruned Vision Models: In-Depth Analysis and Countermeasures [93.17009514112702]
  Pruning, setting a significant subset of the parameters of a neural network to zero, is one of the most popular methods of model compression. Despite existing evidence for this phenomenon, the relationship between neural network pruning and induced bias is not well-understood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T07:42:06Z)
• Training Trajectories of Language Models Across Scales [99.38721327771208]
  Scaling up language models has led to unprecedented performance gains. How do language models of different sizes learn during pre-training? Why do larger language models demonstrate more desirable behaviors?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T19:16:29Z)
• Relating Regularization and Generalization through the Intrinsic Dimension of Activations [11.00580615194563]
  We show that common regularization techniques uniformly decrease the last-layer ID (LLID) of validation set activations for image classification models. We also examine the LLID over the course of training of models that exhibit grokking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T19:00:00Z)
• Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Scheduled Sampling with Elastic Weight Consolidation in Neural Machine Translation [15.581515781839656]
  Autoregressive models trained with maximum likelihood estimation suffer from exposure bias. We propose using Elastic Weight Consolidation as trade-off between mitigating exposure bias and retaining output quality. Experiments on two IWSLT'14 translation tasks demonstrate that our approach alleviates catastrophic forgetting and significantly improves BLEU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T20:37:58Z)
• Extreme Memorization via Scale of Initialization [72.78162454173803]
  We construct an experimental setup in which changing the scale of initialization strongly impacts the implicit regularization induced by SGD. We find that the extent and manner in which generalization ability is affected depends on the activation and loss function used. In the case of the homogeneous ReLU activation, we show that this behavior can be attributed to the loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-31T04:53:11Z)
• Elastic weight consolidation for better bias inoculation [24.12790037712358]
  Elastic weight consolidation (EWC) allows fine-tuning of models to mitigate biases. EWC dominates standard fine-tuning, yielding models with lower levels of forgetting on the original (biased) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T17:45:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.