Insights from Social Shaping Theory: The Appropriation of Large Language Models in an Undergraduate Programming Course

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06451v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:40:14 GMT
• Title: Insights from Social Shaping Theory: The Appropriation of Large Language Models in an Undergraduate Programming Course
• Authors: Aadarsh Padiyath, Xinying Hou, Amy Pang, Diego Viramontes Vargas, Xingjian Gu, Tamara Nelson-Fromm, Zihan Wu, Mark Guzdial, Barbara Ericson,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can generate, debug, and explain code. Our study explores how students' social perceptions influence their own LLM usage.
• Score: 0.9718746651638346
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The capability of large language models (LLMs) to generate, debug, and explain code has sparked the interest of researchers and educators in undergraduate programming, with many anticipating their transformative potential in programming education. However, decisions about why and how to use LLMs in programming education may involve more than just the assessment of an LLM's technical capabilities. Using the social shaping of technology theory as a guiding framework, our study explores how students' social perceptions influence their own LLM usage. We then examine the correlation of self-reported LLM usage with students' self-efficacy and midterm performances in an undergraduate programming course. Triangulating data from an anonymous end-of-course student survey (n = 158), a mid-course self-efficacy survey (n=158), student interviews (n = 10), self-reported LLM usage on homework, and midterm performances, we discovered that students' use of LLMs was associated with their expectations for their future careers and their perceptions of peer usage. Additionally, early self-reported LLM usage in our context correlated with lower self-efficacy and lower midterm scores, while students' perceived over-reliance on LLMs, rather than their usage itself, correlated with decreased self-efficacy later in the course.

Related papers

• AI Meets the Classroom: When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning? [0.0]
  We study how generative AI and specifically large language models (LLMs) impact learning in coding classes. We show across three studies that LLM usage can have positive and negative effects on learning outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-29T17:07:46Z)
• Toward Self-Improvement of LLMs via Imagination, Searching, and Criticizing [56.75702900542643]
  We introduce AlphaLLM for the self-improvements of Large Language Models. It integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with LLMs to establish a self-improving loop. Our experimental results show that AlphaLLM significantly enhances the performance of LLMs without additional annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T15:21:34Z)
• Analyzing LLM Usage in an Advanced Computing Class in India [4.580708389528142]
  This study examines the use of large language models (LLMs) by undergraduate and graduate students for programming assignments in advanced computing classes. We conducted a comprehensive analysis involving 411 students from a Distributed Systems class at an Indian university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T12:06:56Z)
• An Exploratory Study on Upper-Level Computing Students' Use of Large Language Models as Tools in a Semester-Long Project [2.7325338323814328]
  The purpose of this study is to explore computing students' experiences and approaches to using LLMs during a semester-long software engineering project. We collected data from a senior-level software engineering course at Purdue University. We analyzed the data to identify themes related to students' usage patterns and learning outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T15:21:58Z)
• Large Language Models: A Survey [69.72787936480394]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have drawn a lot of attention due to their strong performance on a wide range of natural language tasks. LLMs' ability of general-purpose language understanding and generation is acquired by training billions of model's parameters on massive amounts of text data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T05:37:09Z)
• Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks. The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z)
• An Empirical Study on Usage and Perceptions of LLMs in a Software Engineering Project [1.433758865948252]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a leap in artificial intelligence, excelling in tasks using human language(s) In this paper, we analyze the AI-generated code, prompts used for code generation, and the human intervention levels to integrate the code into the code base. Our findings suggest that LLMs can play a crucial role in the early stages of software development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T14:32:32Z)
• Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z)
• Automated Assessment of Students' Code Comprehension using LLMs [0.3293989832773954]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and encoder-based Semantic Textual Similarity (STS) models are assessed. Our findings indicate that LLMs, when prompted in few-shot and chain-of-thought setting, perform comparable to fine-tuned encoder-based models in evaluating students' short answers in programming domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T20:39:12Z)
• CLOMO: Counterfactual Logical Modification with Large Language Models [109.60793869938534]
  We introduce a novel task, Counterfactual Logical Modification (CLOMO), and a high-quality human-annotated benchmark. In this task, LLMs must adeptly alter a given argumentative text to uphold a predetermined logical relationship. We propose an innovative evaluation metric, the Self-Evaluation Score (SES), to directly evaluate the natural language output of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T08:29:54Z)
• Democratizing Reasoning Ability: Tailored Learning from Large Language Model [97.4921006089966]
  We propose a tailored learning approach to distill such reasoning ability to smaller LMs. We exploit the potential of LLM as a reasoning teacher by building an interactive multi-round learning paradigm. To exploit the reasoning potential of the smaller LM, we propose self-reflection learning to motivate the student to learn from self-made mistakes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T07:50:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.