Mitigating Bias in Dataset Distillation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06609v2
• Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:58:14 GMT
• Title: Mitigating Bias in Dataset Distillation
• Authors: Justin Cui, Ruochen Wang, Yuanhao Xiong, Cho-Jui Hsieh,
• Abstract summary: We study the impact of bias inside the original dataset on the performance of dataset distillation. We introduce a simple yet highly effective approach based on a sample reweighting scheme utilizing kernel density estimation.
• Score: 62.79454960378792
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Dataset Distillation has emerged as a technique for compressing large datasets into smaller synthetic counterparts, facilitating downstream training tasks. In this paper, we study the impact of bias inside the original dataset on the performance of dataset distillation. With a comprehensive empirical evaluation on canonical datasets with color, corruption and background biases, we found that color and background biases in the original dataset will be amplified through the distillation process, resulting in a notable decline in the performance of models trained on the distilled dataset, while corruption bias is suppressed through the distillation process. To reduce bias amplification in dataset distillation, we introduce a simple yet highly effective approach based on a sample reweighting scheme utilizing kernel density estimation. Empirical results on multiple real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Notably, on CMNIST with 5% bias-conflict ratio and IPC 50, our method achieves 91.5% test accuracy compared to 23.8% from vanilla DM, boosting the performance by 67.7%, whereas applying state-of-the-art debiasing method on the same dataset only achieves 53.7% accuracy. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing biases in dataset distillation and provide a promising avenue to address bias amplification in the process.

Related papers

• Not All Samples Should Be Utilized Equally: Towards Understanding and Improving Dataset Distillation [57.6797306341115]
  We take an initial step towards understanding various matching-based DD methods from the perspective of sample difficulty. We then extend the neural scaling laws of data pruning to DD to theoretically explain these matching-based methods. We introduce the Sample Difficulty Correction (SDC) approach, designed to predominantly generate easier samples to achieve higher dataset quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T15:20:32Z)
• Practical Dataset Distillation Based on Deep Support Vectors [27.16222034423108]
  In this paper, we focus on dataset distillation in practical scenarios with access to only a fraction of the entire dataset. We introduce a novel distillation method that augments the conventional process by incorporating general model knowledge via the addition of Deep KKT (DKKT) loss. In practical settings, our approach showed improved performance compared to the baseline distribution matching distillation method on the CIFAR-10 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T06:41:27Z)
• Exploring the potential of prototype-based soft-labels data distillation for imbalanced data classification [0.0]
  Main goal is to push further the performance of prototype-based soft-labels distillation in terms of classification accuracy. Experimental studies trace the capability of the method to distill the data, but also the opportunity to act as an augmentation method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T19:15:19Z)
• Importance-Aware Adaptive Dataset Distillation [53.79746115426363]
  Development of deep learning models is enabled by the availability of large-scale datasets. dataset distillation aims to synthesize a compact dataset that retains the essential information from the large original dataset. We propose an importance-aware adaptive dataset distillation (IADD) method that can improve distillation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T03:29:39Z)
• Dataset Distillation via Adversarial Prediction Matching [24.487950991247764]
  We propose an adversarial framework to solve the dataset distillation problem efficiently. Our method can produce synthetic datasets just 10% the size of the original, yet achieve, on average, 94% of the test accuracy of models trained on the full original datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T13:19:33Z)
• Distill Gold from Massive Ores: Bi-level Data Pruning towards Efficient Dataset Distillation [96.92250565207017]
  We study the data efficiency and selection for the dataset distillation task. By re-formulating the dynamics of distillation, we provide insight into the inherent redundancy in the real dataset. We find the most contributing samples based on their causal effects on the distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T06:53:41Z)
• Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding [86.8751772146264]
  Existing natural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases to achieve high performance on specific datasets. We propose debiasing contrastive learning (DCT) to mitigate biased latent features and neglect the dynamic nature of bias. DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-11T06:16:14Z)
• Minimizing the Accumulated Trajectory Error to Improve Dataset Distillation [151.70234052015948]
  We propose a novel approach that encourages the optimization algorithm to seek a flat trajectory. We show that the weights trained on synthetic data are robust against the accumulated errors perturbations with the regularization towards the flat trajectory. Our method, called Flat Trajectory Distillation (FTD), is shown to boost the performance of gradient-matching methods by up to 4.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-20T15:49:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.