Characterizing Unsafe Code Encapsulation In Real-world Rust Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07936v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 06:59:51 GMT
• Title: Characterizing Unsafe Code Encapsulation In Real-world Rust Systems
• Authors: Zihao Rao, Yiran Yang, Hui Xu,
• Abstract summary: Interior unsafe is an essential design paradigm advocated by the Rust community in system software development. The Rust compiler is incapable of verifying the soundness of a safe function containing unsafe code. We propose a novel unsafety isolation graph to model the essential usage and encapsulation of unsafe code.
• Score: 2.285834282327349
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Interior unsafe is an essential design paradigm advocated by the Rust community in system software development. However, there is little official guidance or few best practices regarding how to encapsulate unsafe code and achieve interior unsafe. The problem is critical because the Rust compiler is incapable of verifying the soundness of a safe function containing unsafe code. Falsely declaring an interior unsafe function as safe may undermine the fundamental memory-safety guarantee of Rust. To address this issue, this paper studies how interior unsafe is achieved in practice, aiming to identify best practices to guide Rust code design concerning unsafe code encapsulation. Specifically, we propose a novel unsafety isolation graph to model the essential usage and encapsulation of unsafe code. Based on the graph, we further propose four major isolation types and nine structural patterns to split a graph into several small self-contained subgraphs. These subgraphs can serve as useful audit units for examining the soundness of unsafe code encapsulation. We applied our approach to four real-world Rust projects. The experimental results demonstrate that our method is effective in characterizing their encapsulation code. Additionally, we identified two common issues in these projects that could complicate soundness verification or incur unsoundness issues.

Related papers

• What Makes and Breaks Safety Fine-tuning? A Mechanistic Study [64.9691741899956]
  Safety fine-tuning helps align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences for their safe deployment. We design a synthetic data generation framework that captures salient aspects of an unsafe input. Using this, we investigate three well-known safety fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T16:12:57Z)
• A Mixed-Methods Study on the Implications of Unsafe Rust for Interoperation, Encapsulation, and Tooling [2.2463451968497425]
  Rust developers need verification tools that can provide guarantees of soundness within multi-language applications. We study how developers reason about foreign function calls, the limitations of the tools that they currently use, their motivations for using unsafe code, and how they reason about encapsulating it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T18:36:21Z)
• CodeAttack: Revealing Safety Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models via Code Completion [117.178835165855]
  This paper introduces CodeAttack, a framework that transforms natural language inputs into code inputs. Our studies reveal a new and universal safety vulnerability of these models against code input. We find that a larger distribution gap between CodeAttack and natural language leads to weaker safety generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T17:55:38Z)
• Static Deadlock Detection for Rust Programs [6.596623081054982]
  Rust relies on its unique ownership mechanism to ensure thread and memory safety. New language features in Rust pose new challenges for vulnerability detection. This paper proposes a static deadlock detection method tailored for Rust programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T09:09:48Z)
• Fast Summary-based Whole-program Analysis to Identify Unsafe Memory Accesses in Rust [23.0568924498396]
  Rust is one of the most promising systems programming languages to solve the memory safety issues that have plagued low-level software for over forty years. unsafe Rust code and directly-linked unsafe foreign libraries may not only introduce memory safety violations themselves but also compromise the entire program as they run in the same monolithic address space as the safe Rust. We have prototyped a whole-program analysis for identifying both unsafe heap allocations and memory accesses to those unsafe heap objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T11:34:21Z)
• Is unsafe an Achilles' Heel? A Comprehensive Study of Safety Requirements in Unsafe Rust Programming [4.981203415693332]
  Rust is an emerging, strongly-typed programming language focusing on efficiency and memory safety. Current unsafe API documents in the standard library exhibited variations, including inconsistency and insufficiency. To enhance Rust security, we suggest unsafe API documents to list systematic descriptions of safety requirements for users to follow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T08:16:10Z)
• Safety Shielding under Delayed Observation [59.86192283565134]
  Shields are correct-by-construction enforcers that guarantee safe execution. Shields should pick the safe corrective actions in such a way that future interferences are most likely minimized. We present the first integration of shields in a realistic driving simulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T10:06:10Z)
• Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning by Verifying Task-Level Properties [84.64203221849648]
  Cost functions are commonly employed in Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) The cost is typically encoded as an indicator function due to the difficulty of quantifying the risk of policy decisions in the state space. In this paper, we investigate an alternative approach that uses domain knowledge to quantify the risk in the proximity of such states by defining a violation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T15:24:06Z)
• Unsafe's Betrayal: Abusing Unsafe Rust in Binary Reverse Engineering toward Finding Memory-safety Bugs via Machine Learning [20.68333298047064]
  Rust provides memory-safe mechanisms to avoid memory-safety bugs in programming. Unsafe code that enhances the usability of Rust provides clear spots for finding memory-safety bugs. We claim that these unsafe spots can still be identifiable in Rust binary code via machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T19:32:18Z)
• SafeText: A Benchmark for Exploring Physical Safety in Language Models [62.810902375154136]
  We study commonsense physical safety across various models designed for text generation and commonsense reasoning tasks. We find that state-of-the-art large language models are susceptible to the generation of unsafe text and have difficulty rejecting unsafe advice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T17:59:31Z)
• Sample-Efficient Safety Assurances using Conformal Prediction [57.92013073974406]
  Early warning systems can provide alerts when an unsafe situation is imminent. To reliably improve safety, these warning systems should have a provable false negative rate. We present a framework that combines a statistical inference technique known as conformal prediction with a simulator of robot/environment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T23:00:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.