Safe Vision-Language Models via Unsafe Weights Manipulation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11742v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:00:22 GMT
• Title: Safe Vision-Language Models via Unsafe Weights Manipulation
• Authors: Moreno D'Incà, Elia Peruzzo, Xingqian Xu, Humphrey Shi, Nicu Sebe, Massimiliano Mancini,
• Abstract summary: We revise safety evaluation by introducing Safe-Ground, a new set of metrics that evaluate safety at different levels of granularity.<n>We take a different direction and explore whether it is possible to make a model safer without training, introducing Unsafe Weights Manipulation (UWM)<n>UWM uses a calibration set of safe and unsafe instances to compare activations between safe and unsafe content, identifying the most important parameters for processing the latter.
• Score: 75.04426753720551
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) often inherit the biases and unsafe associations present within their large-scale training dataset. While recent approaches mitigate unsafe behaviors, their evaluation focuses on how safe the model is on unsafe inputs, ignoring potential shortcomings on safe ones. In this paper, we first revise safety evaluation by introducing SafeGround, a new set of metrics that evaluate safety at different levels of granularity. With this metric, we uncover a surprising issue of training-based methods: they make the model less safe on safe inputs. From this finding, we take a different direction and explore whether it is possible to make a model safer without training, introducing Unsafe Weights Manipulation (UWM). UWM uses a calibration set of safe and unsafe instances to compare activations between safe and unsafe content, identifying the most important parameters for processing the latter. Their values are then manipulated via negation. Experiments show that UWM achieves the best tradeoff between safety and knowledge preservation, consistently improving VLMs on unsafe queries while outperforming even training-based state-of-the-art methods on safe ones.

Related papers

• TraCeS: Trajectory Based Credit Assignment From Sparse Safety Feedback [15.904640266226023]
  In safe reinforcement learning (RL), auxiliary safety costs are used to align the agent to safe decision making. In practice, safety constraints, including cost functions and budgets, are unknown or hard to specify. We address a general setting where the true safety definition is unknown, and has to be learned from sparsely labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T01:11:08Z)
• Can't See the Forest for the Trees: Benchmarking Multimodal Safety Awareness for Multimodal LLMs [56.440345471966666]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have expanded the capabilities of traditional language models by enabling interaction through both text and images.<n>This paper introduces MMSafeAware, the first comprehensive multimodal safety awareness benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs across 29 safety scenarios.<n> MMSafeAware includes both unsafe and over-safety subsets to assess models abilities to correctly identify unsafe content and avoid over-sensitivity that can hinder helpfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T16:12:40Z)
• Vulnerability Mitigation for Safety-Aligned Language Models via Debiasing [12.986006070964772]
  Safety alignment is an essential research topic for real-world AI applications.<n>Our study first identified the difficulty of eliminating such vulnerabilities without sacrificing the model's helpfulness.<n>Our method could enhance the model's helpfulness while maintaining safety, thus improving the trade-off-front.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T09:31:54Z)
• Internal Activation as the Polar Star for Steering Unsafe LLM Behavior [50.463399903987245]
  We introduce SafeSwitch, a framework that dynamically regulates unsafe outputs by monitoring and utilizing the model's internal states. Our empirical results show that SafeSwitch reduces harmful outputs by over 80% on safety benchmarks while maintaining strong utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T04:23:33Z)
• What Makes and Breaks Safety Fine-tuning? A Mechanistic Study [64.9691741899956]
  Safety fine-tuning helps align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences for their safe deployment. We design a synthetic data generation framework that captures salient aspects of an unsafe input. Using this, we investigate three well-known safety fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T16:12:57Z)
• Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training [67.30423823744506]
  This study addresses a critical gap in safety tuning practices for Large Language Models (LLMs) We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position. DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T09:36:33Z)
• Safety Arithmetic: A Framework for Test-time Safety Alignment of Language Models by Steering Parameters and Activations [19.132597762214722]
  Current alignment methods struggle with dynamic user intentions and complex objectives. We propose Safety Arithmetic, a training-free framework enhancing safety across different scenarios. Our experiments show that Safety Arithmetic significantly improves safety measures, reduces over-safety, and maintains model utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T17:48:13Z)
• The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensiveness [56.174255970895466]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play an increasingly pivotal role in natural language processing applications. This paper presents Safety and Over-Defensiveness Evaluation (SODE) benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T17:37:06Z)
• Fail-Safe Adversarial Generative Imitation Learning [9.594432031144716]
  We propose a safety layer that enables a closed-form probability density/gradient of the safe generative continuous policy, end-to-end generative adversarial training, and worst-case safety guarantees. The safety layer maps all actions into a set of safe actions, and uses the change-of-variables formula plus additivity of measures for the density. In an experiment on real-world driver interaction data, we empirically demonstrate tractability, safety and imitation performance of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T13:03:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.