RILe: Reinforced Imitation Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08472v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:56:31 GMT
• Title: RILe: Reinforced Imitation Learning
• Authors: Mert Albaba, Sammy Christen, Christoph Gebhardt, Thomas Langarek, Michael J. Black, Otmar Hilliges,
• Abstract summary: Adversarial variants of Imitation Learning and Inverse Reinforcement Learning offer an alternative by learning policies from expert demonstrations via a discriminator. We propose RILe, a teacher-student system that achieves both robustness to imperfect data and efficiency.
• Score: 60.63173816209543
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning has achieved significant success in generating complex behavior but often requires extensive reward function engineering. Adversarial variants of Imitation Learning and Inverse Reinforcement Learning offer an alternative by learning policies from expert demonstrations via a discriminator. Employing discriminators increases their data- and computational efficiency over the standard approaches; however, results in sensitivity to imperfections in expert data. We propose RILe, a teacher-student system that achieves both robustness to imperfect data and efficiency. In RILe, the student learns an action policy while the teacher dynamically adjusts a reward function based on the student's performance and its alignment with expert demonstrations. By tailoring the reward function to both performance of the student and expert similarity, our system reduces dependence on the discriminator and, hence, increases robustness against data imperfections. Experiments show that RILe outperforms existing methods by 2x in settings with limited or noisy expert data.

Related papers

• Non-Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Successor Feature Matching [23.600285251963395]
  In inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), an agent seeks to replicate expert demonstrations through interactions with the environment. Traditionally, IRL is treated as an adversarial game, where an adversary searches over reward models, and a learner optimize the reward through repeated RL procedures. We propose a novel approach to IRL by direct policy optimization, exploiting a linear factorization of the return as the inner product of successor features and a reward vector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T14:05:50Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process. We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement [50.481380478458945]
  Iterative step-level Process Refinement (IPR) framework provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training. Our experiments on three complex agent tasks demonstrate that our framework outperforms a variety of strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T03:29:13Z)
• RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning [56.997263135104504]
  We show how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than those of interactive imitation learning. Our proposed method uses reinforcement learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards. This relaxes the assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the potential suboptimal human expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T21:05:21Z)
• Basis for Intentions: Efficient Inverse Reinforcement Learning using Past Experience [89.30876995059168]
  inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior. This paper addresses the problem of IRL -- inferring the reward function of an agent from observing its behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-09T17:29:49Z)
• Transferable Reward Learning by Dynamics-Agnostic Discriminator Ensemble [8.857776147129464]
  Recovering reward function from expert demonstrations is a fundamental problem in reinforcement learning. We present a dynamics-agnostic discriminator-ensemble reward learning method capable of learning both state-action and state-only reward functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T05:16:39Z)
• ReIL: A Framework for Reinforced Intervention-based Imitation Learning [3.0846824529023387]
  We introduce Reinforced Intervention-based Learning (ReIL), a framework consisting of a general intervention-based learning algorithm and a multi-task imitation learning model. Experimental results from real world mobile robot navigation challenges indicate that ReIL learns rapidly from sparse supervisor corrections without suffering deterioration in performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T09:30:26Z)
• Learning from Guided Play: A Scheduled Hierarchical Approach for Improving Exploration in Adversarial Imitation Learning [7.51557557629519]
  We present Learning from Guided Play (LfGP), a framework in which we leverage expert demonstrations of, in addition to a main task, multiple auxiliary tasks. This affords many benefits: learning efficiency is improved for main tasks with challenging bottleneck transitions, expert data becomes reusable between tasks, and transfer learning through the reuse of learned auxiliary task models becomes possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T14:58:08Z)
• PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training [94.87393610927812]
  We present an off-policy, interactive reinforcement learning algorithm that capitalizes on the strengths of both feedback and off-policy learning. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning tasks of higher complexity than previously considered by human-in-the-loop methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T14:10:50Z)
• Generative Adversarial Reward Learning for Generalized Behavior Tendency Inference [71.11416263370823]
  We propose a generative inverse reinforcement learning for user behavioral preference modelling. Our model can automatically learn the rewards from user's actions based on discriminative actor-critic network and Wasserstein GAN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T13:14:25Z)
• Bridging the Imitation Gap by Adaptive Insubordination [88.35564081175642]
  We show that when the teaching agent makes decisions with access to privileged information, this information is marginalized during imitation learning. We propose 'Adaptive Insubordination' (ADVISOR) to address this gap. ADVISOR dynamically weights imitation and reward-based reinforcement learning losses during training, enabling on-the-fly switching between imitation and exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T17:59:57Z)
• Off-Policy Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  Adversarial Imitation Learning (AIL) is a class of algorithms in Reinforcement learning (RL) We propose an Off-Policy Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (Off-policy-AIRL) algorithm which is sample efficient as well as gives good imitation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-03T16:51:40Z)
• Human AI interaction loop training: New approach for interactive reinforcement learning [0.0]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) in various decision-making tasks of machine learning provides effective results with an agent learning from a stand-alone reward function. RL presents unique challenges with large amounts of environment states and action spaces, as well as in the determination of rewards. Imitation Learning (IL) offers a promising solution for those challenges using a teacher.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T15:27:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.