Global AI Governance in Healthcare: A Cross-Jurisdictional Regulatory Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08695v1
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 23:36:16 GMT
- Title: Global AI Governance in Healthcare: A Cross-Jurisdictional Regulatory Analysis
- Authors: Attrayee Chakraborty, Mandar Karhade,
- Abstract summary: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being adopted across the world and promises a new revolution in healthcare.
While AI-enabled medical devices in North America dominate 42.3% of the global market, the use of AI-enabled medical devices in other countries is still a story waiting to be unfolded.
We aim to delve deeper into global regulatory approaches towards AI use in healthcare, with a focus on how common themes are emerging globally.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being adopted across the world and promises a new revolution in healthcare. While AI-enabled medical devices in North America dominate 42.3% of the global market, the use of AI-enabled medical devices in other countries is still a story waiting to be unfolded. We aim to delve deeper into global regulatory approaches towards AI use in healthcare, with a focus on how common themes are emerging globally. We compare these themes to the World Health Organization's (WHO) regulatory considerations and principles on ethical use of AI for healthcare applications. Our work seeks to take a global perspective on AI policy by analyzing 14 legal jurisdictions including countries representative of various regions in the world (North America, South America, South East Asia, Middle East, Africa, Australia, and the Asia-Pacific). Our eventual goal is to foster a global conversation on the ethical use of AI in healthcare and the regulations that will guide it. We propose solutions to promote international harmonization of AI regulations and examine the requirements for regulating generative AI, using China and Singapore as examples of countries with well-developed policies in this area.
Related papers
- AI, Global Governance, and Digital Sovereignty [1.3976439685325095]
We argue that AI systems will embed in global governance to create dueling dynamics of public/private cooperation and contestation.
We conclude by sketching future directions for IR research on AI and global governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-23T00:05:33Z) - Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - Democratising Artificial Intelligence for Pandemic Preparedness and Global Governance in Latin American and Caribbean Countries [0.0]
Infectious diseases, transmitted directly or indirectly, are among the leading causes of epidemics and pandemics.
The Global South AI for Pandemic & Epidemic Preparedness & Response Network (AI4PEP) has developed an initiative comprising 16 projects across 16 countries in the Global South.
This opinion introduces our branches in Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) countries and discusses AI governance in LAC in the light of biotechnology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-21T15:59:13Z) - Can apparent bystanders distinctively shape an outcome? Global south
countries and global catastrophic risk-focused governance of artificial
intelligence [0.0]
We argue that global south countries like India and Singapore could be fairly consequential in the global catastrophic risk-focused governance of AI.
We also suggest some ways through which global south countries can play a positive role in designing, strengthening and operationalizing global catastrophic risk-focused AI governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T18:54:16Z) - Towards Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence for Equitable Global Health [22.262855329743985]
AI can potentially transform global health, but algorithmic bias can exacerbate social inequities and disparity.
FairMI4GH aimed to stimulate dialogue, facilitate knowledge transfer, and spark innovative solutions.
The need to mitigate data biases from the research design stage, adopt a human-centered approach, and advocate for AI transparency was recognized.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-10T17:22:41Z) - FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI.
This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z) - From Military to Healthcare: Adopting and Expanding Ethical Principles
for Generative Artificial Intelligence [10.577932700903112]
Generative AI, an emerging technology designed to efficiently generate valuable information, holds great promise.
We propose GREAT PLEA ethical principles, encompassing governance, reliability, equity, accountability, traceability, privacy, lawfulness, empathy, and autonomy, for generative AI in healthcare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-04T16:22:06Z) - Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time.
We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups.
If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI.
Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.