Navigating the Shadows: Unveiling Effective Disturbances for Modern AI Content Detectors
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08922v1
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:37:01 GMT
- Title: Navigating the Shadows: Unveiling Effective Disturbances for Modern AI Content Detectors
- Authors: Ying Zhou, Ben He, Le Sun,
- Abstract summary: AI-text detection has emerged to distinguish between human and machine-generated content.
Recent research indicates that these detection systems often lack robustness and struggle to effectively differentiate perturbed texts.
Our work simulates real-world scenarios in both informal and professional writing, exploring the out-of-the-box performance of current detectors.
- Score: 24.954755569786396
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: With the launch of ChatGPT, large language models (LLMs) have attracted global attention. In the realm of article writing, LLMs have witnessed extensive utilization, giving rise to concerns related to intellectual property protection, personal privacy, and academic integrity. In response, AI-text detection has emerged to distinguish between human and machine-generated content. However, recent research indicates that these detection systems often lack robustness and struggle to effectively differentiate perturbed texts. Currently, there is a lack of systematic evaluations regarding detection performance in real-world applications, and a comprehensive examination of perturbation techniques and detector robustness is also absent. To bridge this gap, our work simulates real-world scenarios in both informal and professional writing, exploring the out-of-the-box performance of current detectors. Additionally, we have constructed 12 black-box text perturbation methods to assess the robustness of current detection models across various perturbation granularities. Furthermore, through adversarial learning experiments, we investigate the impact of perturbation data augmentation on the robustness of AI-text detectors. We have released our code and data at https://github.com/zhouying20/ai-text-detector-evaluation.
Related papers
- DetectRL: Benchmarking LLM-Generated Text Detection in Real-World Scenarios [38.952481877244644]
We present a new benchmark, DetectRL, highlighting that even state-of-the-art (SOTA) detection techniques still underperformed in this task.
Our development of DetectRL reveals the strengths and limitations of current SOTA detectors.
We believe DetectRL could serve as an effective benchmark for assessing detectors in real-world scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T09:01:25Z) - Humanizing Machine-Generated Content: Evading AI-Text Detection through Adversarial Attack [24.954755569786396]
We propose a framework for a broader class of adversarial attacks, designed to perform minor perturbations in machine-generated content to evade detection.
We consider two attack settings: white-box and black-box, and employ adversarial learning in dynamic scenarios to assess the potential enhancement of the current detection model's robustness.
The empirical results reveal that the current detection models can be compromised in as little as 10 seconds, leading to the misclassification of machine-generated text as human-written content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T12:49:22Z) - The Impact of Prompts on Zero-Shot Detection of AI-Generated Text [4.337364406035291]
In chat-based applications, users commonly input prompts and utilize the AI-generated texts.
We introduce an evaluative framework to empirically analyze the impact of prompts on the detection accuracy of AI-generated text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T11:33:34Z) - Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated
Student Essay Detection [29.433764586753956]
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in text generation tasks.
The utilization of these models carries inherent risks, including but not limited to plagiarism, the dissemination of fake news, and issues in educational exercises.
This paper aims to bridge this gap by constructing AIG-ASAP, an AI-generated student essay dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-01T08:11:56Z) - Assaying on the Robustness of Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detectors [57.7003399760813]
We explore advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) and their specialized variants, contributing to this field in several ways.
We uncover a significant correlation between topics and detection performance.
These investigations shed light on the adaptability and robustness of these detection methods across diverse topics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-20T10:53:53Z) - Towards Possibilities & Impossibilities of AI-generated Text Detection:
A Survey [97.33926242130732]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the domain of natural language processing (NLP) with remarkable capabilities of generating human-like text responses.
Despite these advancements, several works in the existing literature have raised serious concerns about the potential misuse of LLMs.
To address these concerns, a consensus among the research community is to develop algorithmic solutions to detect AI-generated text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T18:11:32Z) - Watermarking Conditional Text Generation for AI Detection: Unveiling
Challenges and a Semantic-Aware Watermark Remedy [52.765898203824975]
We introduce a semantic-aware watermarking algorithm that considers the characteristics of conditional text generation and the input context.
Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method yields substantial improvements across various text generation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T20:24:22Z) - On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection [76.55825911221434]
We argue that as machine-generated text approximates human-like quality, the sample size needed for detection bounds increases.
We test various state-of-the-art text generators, including GPT-2, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Llama, Llama-2-13B-Chat-HF, and Llama-2-70B-Chat-HF, against detectors, including oBERTa-Large/Base-Detector, GPTZero.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-10T17:47:39Z) - MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detection [54.81446366272403]
This paper proposes the first benchmark framework for MGT detection against powerful large language models (LLMs)
We show that a larger number of words in general leads to better performance and most detection methods can achieve similar performance with much fewer training samples.
Our findings indicate that the model-based detection methods still perform well in the text attribution task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-26T21:12:36Z) - Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected? [54.670136179857344]
Unregulated use of LLMs can potentially lead to malicious consequences such as plagiarism, generating fake news, spamming, etc.
Recent works attempt to tackle this problem either using certain model signatures present in the generated text outputs or by applying watermarking techniques.
In this paper, we show that these detectors are not reliable in practical scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T17:53:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.