The World Wide Recipe: A community-centred framework for fine-grained data collection and regional bias operationalisation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09496v3
• Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 17:13:58 GMT
• Title: The World Wide Recipe: A community-centred framework for fine-grained data collection and regional bias operationalisation
• Authors: Jabez Magomere, Shu Ishida, Tejumade Afonja, Aya Salama, Daniel Kochin, Foutse Yuehgoh, Imane Hamzaoui, Raesetje Sefala, Aisha Alaagib, Samantha Dalal, Beatrice Marchegiani, Elizaveta Semenova, Lauren Crais, Siobhan Mackenzie Hall,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the World Wide recipe, which sets forth a framework for culturally aware and participatory data collection. We analyse bias operationalisation to highlight how current systems underperform across several dimensions. We find that these T2I models generally do not produce quality outputs of dishes specific to various regions.
• Score: 3.505416621482746
• License:
• Abstract: We introduce the World Wide recipe, which sets forth a framework for culturally aware and participatory data collection, and the resultant regionally diverse World Wide Dishes evaluation dataset. We also analyse bias operationalisation to highlight how current systems underperform across several dimensions: (in-)accuracy, (mis-)representation, and cultural (in-)sensitivity, with evidence from qualitative community-based observations and quantitative automated tools. We find that these T2I models generally do not produce quality outputs of dishes specific to various regions. This is true even for the US, which is typically considered more well-resourced in training data -- although the generation of US dishes does outperform that of the investigated African countries. The models demonstrate the propensity to produce inaccurate and culturally misrepresentative, flattening, and insensitive outputs. These representational biases have the potential to further reinforce stereotypes and disproportionately contribute to erasure based on region. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/oxai/world-wide-dishes.

Related papers

• Who Does the Giant Number Pile Like Best: Analyzing Fairness in Hiring Contexts [5.111540255111445]
  Race-based differences appear in approximately 10% of generated summaries, while gender-based differences occur in only 1%. Retrieval models demonstrate comparable sensitivity to non-demographic changes, suggesting that fairness issues may stem from general brittleness issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T07:28:10Z)
• Thinking Racial Bias in Fair Forgery Detection: Models, Datasets and Evaluations [63.52709761339949]
  We first contribute a dedicated dataset called the Fair Forgery Detection (FairFD) dataset, where we prove the racial bias of public state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. We design novel metrics including Approach Averaged Metric and Utility Regularized Metric, which can avoid deceptive results. We also present an effective and robust post-processing technique, Bias Pruning with Fair Activations (BPFA), which improves fairness without requiring retraining or weight updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T14:53:18Z)
• Diverse Perspectives, Divergent Models: Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Depression Detection on Twitter [4.462334751640166]
  We evaluate the generalization of benchmark datasets to build AI models on cross-cultural Twitter data. Our results show that depression detection models do not generalize globally. Pre-trained language models achieve the best generalization compared to Logistic Regression, though still show significant gaps in performance on depressed and non-Western users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T03:59:12Z)
• Challenges in Annotating Datasets to Quantify Bias in Under-represented Society [7.9342597513806865]
  Benchmark bias datasets have been developed for binary gender classification and ethical/racial considerations. Motivated by the lack of annotated datasets for quantifying bias in under-represented societies, we created benchmark datasets for the New Zealand (NZ) population. This research outlines the manual annotation process, provides an overview of the challenges we encountered and lessons learnt, and presents recommendations for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T22:24:39Z)
• CBBQ: A Chinese Bias Benchmark Dataset Curated with Human-AI Collaboration for Large Language Models [52.25049362267279]
  We present a Chinese Bias Benchmark dataset that consists of over 100K questions jointly constructed by human experts and generative language models. The testing instances in the dataset are automatically derived from 3K+ high-quality templates manually authored with stringent quality control. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the dataset in detecting model bias, with all 10 publicly available Chinese large language models exhibiting strong bias in certain categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T14:14:44Z)
• Assessing Demographic Bias Transfer from Dataset to Model: A Case Study in Facial Expression Recognition [1.5340540198612824]
  Two metrics focus on the representational and stereotypical bias of the dataset, and the third one on the residual bias of the trained model. We demonstrate the usefulness of the metrics by applying them to a FER problem based on the popular Affectnet dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T09:40:42Z)
• Improving QA Generalization by Concurrent Modeling of Multiple Biases [61.597362592536896]
  Existing NLP datasets contain various biases that models can easily exploit to achieve high performances on the corresponding evaluation sets. We propose a general framework for improving the performance on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets by concurrent modeling of multiple biases in the training data. We extensively evaluate our framework on extractive question answering with training data from various domains with multiple biases of different strengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T11:18:49Z)
• Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamics [118.75207687144817]
  We introduce Data Maps, a model-based tool to characterize and diagnose datasets. We leverage a largely ignored source of information: the behavior of the model on individual instances during training. Our results indicate that a shift in focus from quantity to quality of data could lead to robust models and improved out-of-distribution generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-22T20:19:41Z)
• REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasets [64.76453161039973]
  REVISE (REvealing VIsual biaSEs) is a tool that assists in the investigation of a visual dataset. It surfacing potential biases along three dimensions: (1) object-based, (2) person-based, and (3) geography-based.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-16T23:54:37Z)
• Diversity inducing Information Bottleneck in Model Ensembles [73.80615604822435]
  In this paper, we target the problem of generating effective ensembles of neural networks by encouraging diversity in prediction. We explicitly optimize a diversity inducing adversarial loss for learning latent variables and thereby obtain diversity in the output predictions necessary for modeling multi-modal data. Compared to the most competitive baselines, we show significant improvements in classification accuracy, under a shift in the data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T03:10:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.