A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09520v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 18:16:27 GMT
• Title: A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice
• Authors: Bayode Ogunleye, Kudirat Ibilola Zakariyyah, Oluwaseun Ajao, Olakunle Olayinka, Hemlata Sharma,
• Abstract summary: There are no agreed guidelines towards the usage of GenAI systems in higher education. There is a need for additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional studies in HE through collaboration.
• Score: 0.37282630026096586
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academia is a subjective and hotly debated topic. Currently, there are no agreed guidelines towards the usage of GenAI systems in higher education (HE) and, thus, it is still unclear how to make effective use of the technology for teaching and learning practice. This paper provides an overview of the current state of research on GenAI for teaching and learning in HE. To this end, this study conducted a systematic review of relevant studies indexed by Scopus, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search criteria revealed a total of 625 research papers, of which 355 met the final inclusion criteria. The findings from the review showed the current state and the future trends in documents, citations, document sources/authors, keywords, and co-authorship. The research gaps identified suggest that while some authors have looked at understanding the detection of AI-generated text, it may be beneficial to understand how GenAI can be incorporated into supporting the educational curriculum for assessments, teaching, and learning delivery. Furthermore, there is a need for additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional studies in HE through collaboration. This will strengthen the awareness and understanding of students, tutors, and other stakeholders, which will be instrumental in formulating guidelines, frameworks, and policies for GenAI usage.

Related papers

• Generative AI in Self-Directed Learning: A Scoping Review [0.0]
  This scoping review examines the current body of knowledge at the intersection of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Self-Directed Learning (SDL) GenAI tools, including ChatGPT and other Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in potentially supporting SDL through on-demand, personalised assistance. There are still significant gaps in understanding the long-term impacts of GenAI on SDL outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T09:46:40Z)
• Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis [0.0]
  This review examines the relationship between Generative AI (GenAI) and agency in education, analyzing the literature available through the lens of Critical Digital Pedagogy. We conducted an AI-supported hybrid thematic analysis that revealed three key themes: Control in Digital Spaces, Variable Engagement and Access, and Changing Notions of Agency. The findings suggest that while GenAI may enhance learner agency through personalization and support, it also risks exacerbating educational inequalities and diminishing learner autonomy in certain contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T14:40:31Z)
• Understanding Student and Academic Staff Perceptions of AI Use in Assessment and Feedback [0.0]
  The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education necessitates assessment reform. This study addresses a critical gap by exploring student and academic staff experiences with AI and GenAI tools. An online survey collected data from 35 academic staff and 282 students across two universities in Vietnam and one in Singapore.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T10:25:01Z)
• Harnessing AI for efficient analysis of complex policy documents: a case study of Executive Order 14110 [44.99833362998488]
  Policy documents, such as legislation, regulations, and executive orders, are crucial in shaping society. This study aims to evaluate the potential of AI in streamlining policy analysis and to identify the strengths and limitations of current AI approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T11:19:28Z)
• Explainable Generative AI (GenXAI): A Survey, Conceptualization, and Research Agenda [1.8592384822257952]
  We elaborate on why XAI has gained importance with the rise of GenAI and its challenges for explainability research. We also unveil novel and emerging desiderata that explanations should fulfill, covering aspects such as verifiability, interactivity, security, and cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T08:18:16Z)
• A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [58.6354685593418]
  This paper proposes several article-level, field-normalized, and large language model-empowered bibliometric indicators to evaluate reviews. The newly emerging AI-generated literature reviews are also appraised. This work offers insights into the current challenges of literature reviews and envisions future directions for their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
• Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities' Policies, Resources, and Guidelines [11.470910427306569]
  This study analyzes academic policies and guidelines established by top-ranked U.S. universities regarding the use of GenAI. Results show that the majority of these universities adopt an open but cautious approach towards GenAI. Findings provide four practical implications for educators in teaching practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T18:33:11Z)
• Explainable Authorship Identification in Cultural Heritage Applications: Analysis of a New Perspective [48.031678295495574]
  We explore the applicability of existing general-purpose eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques to AId. In particular, we assess the relative merits of three different types of XAI techniques on three different AId tasks. Our analysis shows that, while these techniques make important first steps towards explainable Authorship Identification, more work remains to be done.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T20:51:15Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI [65.44737844681256]
  A lack of consensus on how to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) hinders the advancement of the field. We argue that one way to close the gap is to develop evaluation methods that account for different user requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T05:17:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.