A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09520v1
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 18:16:27 GMT
- Title: A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice
- Authors: Bayode Ogunleye, Kudirat Ibilola Zakariyyah, Oluwaseun Ajao, Olakunle Olayinka, Hemlata Sharma,
- Abstract summary: There are no agreed guidelines towards the usage of GenAI systems in higher education.
There is a need for additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional studies in HE through collaboration.
- Score: 0.37282630026096586
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academia is a subjective and hotly debated topic. Currently, there are no agreed guidelines towards the usage of GenAI systems in higher education (HE) and, thus, it is still unclear how to make effective use of the technology for teaching and learning practice. This paper provides an overview of the current state of research on GenAI for teaching and learning in HE. To this end, this study conducted a systematic review of relevant studies indexed by Scopus, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search criteria revealed a total of 625 research papers, of which 355 met the final inclusion criteria. The findings from the review showed the current state and the future trends in documents, citations, document sources/authors, keywords, and co-authorship. The research gaps identified suggest that while some authors have looked at understanding the detection of AI-generated text, it may be beneficial to understand how GenAI can be incorporated into supporting the educational curriculum for assessments, teaching, and learning delivery. Furthermore, there is a need for additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional studies in HE through collaboration. This will strengthen the awareness and understanding of students, tutors, and other stakeholders, which will be instrumental in formulating guidelines, frameworks, and policies for GenAI usage.
Related papers
- Understanding Student and Academic Staff Perceptions of AI Use in Assessment and Feedback [0.0]
The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education necessitates assessment reform.
This study addresses a critical gap by exploring student and academic staff experiences with AI and GenAI tools.
An online survey collected data from 35 academic staff and 282 students across two universities in Vietnam and one in Singapore.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-22T10:25:01Z) - Explainable Generative AI (GenXAI): A Survey, Conceptualization, and Research Agenda [1.8592384822257952]
We elaborate on why XAI has gained importance with the rise of GenAI and its challenges for explainability research.
We also unveil novel and emerging desiderata that explanations should fulfill, covering aspects such as verifiability, interactivity, security, and cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T08:18:16Z) - A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [58.6354685593418]
This paper proposes several article-level, field-normalized, and large language model-empowered bibliometric indicators to evaluate reviews.
The newly emerging AI-generated literature reviews are also appraised.
This work offers insights into the current challenges of literature reviews and envisions future directions for their development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z) - Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities' Policies, Resources, and Guidelines [11.470910427306569]
This study analyzes academic policies and guidelines established by top-ranked U.S. universities regarding the use of GenAI.
Results show that the majority of these universities adopt an open but cautious approach towards GenAI.
Findings provide four practical implications for educators in teaching practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-08T18:33:11Z) - Automatic assessment of text-based responses in post-secondary
education: A systematic review [0.0]
There is immense potential to automate rapid assessment and feedback of text-based responses in education.
To understand how text-based automatic assessment systems have been developed and applied in education in recent years, three research questions are considered.
This systematic review provides an overview of recent educational applications of text-based assessment systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-30T17:16:45Z) - The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting
generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and
Millennial Generation teachers? [0.0]
Gen Z students were generally optimistic about the potential benefits of generative AI (GenAI)
Gen X and Gen Y teachers expressed heightened concerns about overreliance, ethical and pedagogical implications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-04T14:42:06Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model
Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs)
We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date.
We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z) - Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of
Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI [65.44737844681256]
A lack of consensus on how to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) hinders the advancement of the field.
We argue that one way to close the gap is to develop evaluation methods that account for different user requirements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-22T05:17:33Z) - A New Neural Search and Insights Platform for Navigating and Organizing
AI Research [56.65232007953311]
We introduce a new platform, AI Research Navigator, that combines classical keyword search with neural retrieval to discover and organize relevant literature.
We give an overview of the overall architecture of the system and of the components for document analysis, question answering, search, analytics, expert search, and recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-30T19:12:25Z) - A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning.
This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021.
We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.