Methodological Foundations for AI-Driven Survey Question Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01150v1
• Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 09:50:34 GMT
• Title: Methodological Foundations for AI-Driven Survey Question Generation
• Authors: Ted K. Mburu, Kangxuan Rong, Campbell J. McColley, Alexandra Werth,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a methodological framework for using generative AI in educational survey research.<n>We explore how Large Language Models can generate adaptive, context-aware survey questions.<n>We examine ethical issues such as bias, privacy, and transparency.
• Score: 41.94295877935867
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents a methodological framework for using generative AI in educational survey research. We explore how Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate adaptive, context-aware survey questions and introduce the Synthetic Question-Response Analysis (SQRA) framework, which enables iterative testing and refinement of AI-generated prompts prior to deployment with human participants. Guided by Activity Theory, we analyze how AI tools mediate participant engagement and learning, and we examine ethical issues such as bias, privacy, and transparency. Through sentiment, lexical, and structural analyses of both AI-to-AI and AI-to-human survey interactions, we evaluate the alignment and effectiveness of these questions. Our findings highlight the promise and limitations of AI-driven survey instruments, emphasizing the need for robust prompt engineering and validation to support trustworthy, scalable, and contextually relevant data collection in engineering education.

Related papers

• Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research [2.2665233748698355]
  We present a community-centric study drawing on 284 survey responses and 15 semi-structured interviews with social scientists.<n>We find that the use of AI in research settings has increased significantly among social scientists in step with the widespread popularity of generative AI (genAI)<n>Ethical concerns, particularly around automation bias, deskilling, research misconduct, complex interpretability, and representational harm, are raised in relation to genAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T19:55:36Z)
• The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
  We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Analyzing the Impact of AI Tools on Student Study Habits and Academic Performance [0.0]
  The research focuses on how AI tools can support personalized learning, adaptive test adjustments, and provide real-time classroom analysis.<n>Student feedback revealed strong support for these features, and the study found a significant reduction in study hours alongside an increase in GPA.<n>Despite these benefits, challenges such as over-reliance on AI and difficulties in integrating AI with traditional teaching methods were also identified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T04:51:57Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Augmenting the Author: Exploring the Potential of AI Collaboration in Academic Writing [25.572926673827165]
  This case study highlights the importance of prompt design, output analysis, and recognizing the AI's limitations to ensure responsible and effective AI integration in scholarly work. The paper contributes to the field of Human-Computer Interaction by exploring effective prompt strategies and providing a comparative analysis of Gen AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T19:06:39Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Can AI Serve as a Substitute for Human Subjects in Software Engineering Research? [24.39463126056733]
  This vision paper proposes a novel approach to qualitative data collection in software engineering research by harnessing the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) We explore the potential of AI-generated synthetic text as an alternative source of qualitative data. We discuss the prospective development of new foundation models aimed at emulating human behavior in observational studies and user evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T14:05:52Z)
• MAILS -- Meta AI Literacy Scale: Development and Testing of an AI Literacy Questionnaire Based on Well-Founded Competency Models and Psychological Change- and Meta-Competencies [6.368014180870025]
  The questionnaire should be modular (i.e., including different facets that can be used independently of each other) to be flexibly applicable in professional life. We derived 60 items to represent different facets of AI Literacy according to Ng and colleagues conceptualisation of AI literacy. Additional 12 items to represent psychological competencies such as problem solving, learning, and emotion regulation in regard to AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-18T12:35:55Z)
• Methodological reflections for AI alignment research using human feedback [0.0]
  AI alignment aims to investigate whether AI technologies align with human interests and values and function in a safe and ethical manner. LLMs have the potential to exhibit unintended behavior due to their ability to learn and adapt in ways that are difficult to predict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T14:27:33Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.