Unlock the Correlation between Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning in Training Code Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10305v1
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 03:39:01 GMT
- Title: Unlock the Correlation between Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning in Training Code Large Language Models
- Authors: Jie Chen, Xintian Han, Yu Ma, Xun Zhou, Liang Xiang,
- Abstract summary: We make an attempt to understand the correlation between supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
We find that both atomic and synthetic functions are indispensable for SFT's generalization.
- Score: 12.656574142412484
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Automatic code generation has been a longstanding research topic. With the advancement of general-purpose large language models (LLMs), the ability to code stands out as one important measure to the model's reasoning performance. Usually, a two-stage training paradigm is implemented to obtain a Code LLM, namely the pretraining and the fine-tuning. Within the fine-tuning, supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning (RL) are often used to improve the model's zero-shot ability. A large number of work has been conducted to improve the model's performance on code-related benchmarks with either modifications to the algorithm or refinement of the dataset. However, we still lack a deep insight into the correlation between SFT and RL. For instance, what kind of dataset should be used to ensure generalization, or what if we abandon the SFT phase in fine-tuning. In this work, we make an attempt to understand the correlation between SFT and RL. To facilitate our research, we manually craft 100 basis python functions, called atomic functions, and then a synthesizing pipeline is deployed to create a large number of synthetic functions on top of the atomic ones. In this manner, we ensure that the train and test sets remain distinct, preventing data contamination. Through comprehensive ablation study, we find: (1) Both atomic and synthetic functions are indispensable for SFT's generalization, and only a handful of synthetic functions are adequate; (2) Through RL, the SFT's generalization to target domain can be greatly enhanced, even with the same training prompts; (3) Training RL from scratch can alleviate the over-fitting issue introduced in the SFT phase.
Related papers
- Q-SFT: Q-Learning for Language Models via Supervised Fine-Tuning [62.984693936073974]
Value-based reinforcement learning can learn effective policies for a wide range of multi-turn problems.
Current value-based RL methods have proven particularly challenging to scale to the setting of large language models.
We propose a novel offline RL algorithm that addresses these drawbacks, casting Q-learning as a modified supervised fine-tuning problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-07T21:36:52Z) - Reference Trustable Decoding: A Training-Free Augmentation Paradigm for Large Language Models [79.41139393080736]
Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced and demonstrated impressive capabilities.
In-Context Learning (ICL) and.
Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) are currently two mainstream methods for augmenting.
LLMs to downstream tasks.
We propose Reference Trustable Decoding (RTD), a paradigm that allows models to quickly adapt to new tasks without fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T10:48:20Z) - SpaFL: Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Sparse Models and Low computational Overhead [75.87007729801304]
SpaFL: a communication-efficient FL framework is proposed to optimize sparse model structures with low computational overhead.
Experiments show that SpaFL improves accuracy while requiring much less communication and computing resources compared to sparse baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-01T13:10:35Z) - HFT: Half Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models [42.60438623804577]
Large language models (LLMs) with one or more fine-tuning phases have become a necessary step to unlock various capabilities.
In this paper, we find that by regularly resetting partial parameters, LLMs can restore some of the original knowledge.
We introduce Half Fine-Tuning (HFT) for LLMs, as a substitute for full fine-tuning (FFT), to mitigate the forgetting issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T07:07:58Z) - FT2Ra: A Fine-Tuning-Inspired Approach to Retrieval-Augmented Code Completion [24.964973946366335]
We develop a novel retrieval-based method, FT2Ra, which aims to mimic genuine fine-tuning.
FT2Ra achieves a 4.29% improvement in accuracy compared to the best baseline method on UniXcoder.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T01:42:15Z) - Teaching Large Language Models to Reason with Reinforcement Learning [38.17625148525193]
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (textbfRLHF) has emerged as a dominant approach for aligning LLM outputs with human preferences.
Inspired by the success of RLHF, we study the performance of multiple algorithms that learn from feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T16:36:29Z) - Automatic Unit Test Data Generation and Actor-Critic Reinforcement
Learning for Code Synthesis [16.88062487980405]
We present a novel approach to automatically obtain data consisting of function signatures and associated Unit Tests.
We show that it, in conjunction with automatically generated training data, leads to improvement of a pre-trained code language model's performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T17:13:16Z) - The Languini Kitchen: Enabling Language Modelling Research at Different
Scales of Compute [66.84421705029624]
We introduce an experimental protocol that enables model comparisons based on equivalent compute, measured in accelerator hours.
We pre-process an existing large, diverse, and high-quality dataset of books that surpasses existing academic benchmarks in quality, diversity, and document length.
This work also provides two baseline models: a feed-forward model derived from the GPT-2 architecture and a recurrent model in the form of a novel LSTM with ten-fold throughput.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T10:31:17Z) - End-to-End Meta-Bayesian Optimisation with Transformer Neural Processes [52.818579746354665]
This paper proposes the first end-to-end differentiable meta-BO framework that generalises neural processes to learn acquisition functions via transformer architectures.
We enable this end-to-end framework with reinforcement learning (RL) to tackle the lack of labelled acquisition data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T10:58:46Z) - On Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning: Optimism in the
Face of Large State Spaces [208.67848059021915]
We study the exploration-exploitation tradeoff at the core of reinforcement learning.
In particular, we prove that the complexity of the function class $mathcalF$ characterizes the complexity of the function.
Our regret bounds are independent of the number of episodes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-09T18:32:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.