Are Large Language Models True Healthcare Jacks-of-All-Trades? Benchmarking Across Health Professions Beyond Physician Exams
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11328v1
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:40:36 GMT
- Title: Are Large Language Models True Healthcare Jacks-of-All-Trades? Benchmarking Across Health Professions Beyond Physician Exams
- Authors: Zheheng Luo, Chenhan Yuan, Qianqian Xie, Sophia Ananiadou,
- Abstract summary: Existing benchmarks for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in healthcare predominantly focus on medical doctors.
We introduce the Examinations for Medical Personnel in Chinese (EMPEC), a pioneering large-scale healthcare knowledge benchmark in traditional Chinese.
EMPEC consists of 157,803 exam questions across 124 subjects and 20 healthcare professions, including underrepresented occupations like Optometrists and Audiologists.
- Score: 32.77551245372691
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their potential in delivering accurate answers to questions about world knowledge. Despite this, existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs in healthcare predominantly focus on medical doctors, leaving other critical healthcare professions underrepresented. To fill this research gap, we introduce the Examinations for Medical Personnel in Chinese (EMPEC), a pioneering large-scale healthcare knowledge benchmark in traditional Chinese. EMPEC consists of 157,803 exam questions across 124 subjects and 20 healthcare professions, including underrepresented occupations like Optometrists and Audiologists. Each question is tagged with its release time and source, ensuring relevance and authenticity. We conducted extensive experiments on 17 LLMs, including proprietary, open-source models, general domain models and medical specific models, evaluating their performance under various settings. Our findings reveal that while leading models like GPT-4 achieve over 75\% accuracy, they still struggle with specialized fields and alternative medicine. Surprisingly, general-purpose LLMs outperformed medical-specific models, and incorporating EMPEC's training data significantly enhanced performance. Additionally, the results on questions released after the models' training cutoff date were consistent with overall performance trends, suggesting that the models' performance on the test set can predict their effectiveness in addressing unseen healthcare-related queries. The transition from traditional to simplified Chinese characters had a negligible impact on model performance, indicating robust linguistic versatility. Our study underscores the importance of expanding benchmarks to cover a broader range of healthcare professions to better assess the applicability of LLMs in real-world healthcare scenarios.
Related papers
- SemioLLM: Assessing Large Language Models for Semiological Analysis in Epilepsy Research [45.2233252981348]
Large Language Models have shown promising results in their ability to encode general medical knowledge.
We test the ability of state-of-the-art LLMs to leverage their internal knowledge and reasoning for epilepsy diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T11:02:12Z) - Asclepius: A Spectrum Evaluation Benchmark for Medical Multi-Modal Large
Language Models [59.60384461302662]
We introduce Asclepius, a novel benchmark for evaluating Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs)
Asclepius rigorously and comprehensively assesses model capability in terms of distinct medical specialties and different diagnostic capacities.
We also provide an in-depth analysis of 6 Med-MLLMs and compare them with 5 human specialists.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T08:04:23Z) - AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs.
This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios.
We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z) - MedLM: Exploring Language Models for Medical Question Answering Systems [2.84801080855027]
Large Language Models (LLMs) with their advanced generative capabilities have shown promise in various NLP tasks.
This study aims to compare the performance of general and medical-specific distilled LMs for medical Q&A.
The findings will provide valuable insights into the suitability of different LMs for specific applications in the medical domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-21T03:37:47Z) - MedBench: A Large-Scale Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Large
Language Models [56.36916128631784]
We introduce MedBench, a comprehensive benchmark for the Chinese medical domain.
This benchmark is composed of four key components: the Chinese Medical Licensing Examination, the Resident Standardization Training Examination, and real-world clinic cases.
We perform extensive experiments and conduct an in-depth analysis from diverse perspectives, which culminate in the following findings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-20T07:01:49Z) - Large language models in healthcare and medical domain: A review [4.456243157307507]
Large language models (LLMs) provide proficient responses to free-text queries.
This review explores the potential of LLMs to amplify the efficiency and effectiveness of diverse healthcare applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-12T20:54:51Z) - ChiMed-GPT: A Chinese Medical Large Language Model with Full Training Regime and Better Alignment to Human Preferences [51.66185471742271]
We propose ChiMed-GPT, a benchmark LLM designed explicitly for Chinese medical domain.
ChiMed-GPT undergoes a comprehensive training regime with pre-training, SFT, and RLHF.
We analyze possible biases through prompting ChiMed-GPT to perform attitude scales regarding discrimination of patients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T12:25:32Z) - An Automatic Evaluation Framework for Multi-turn Medical Consultations
Capabilities of Large Language Models [22.409334091186995]
Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucinations, leading to overly confident but incorrect judgments.
This paper introduces an automated evaluation framework that assesses the practical capabilities of LLMs as virtual doctors during multi-turn consultations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-05T09:24:48Z) - How far is Language Model from 100% Few-shot Named Entity Recognition in Medical Domain [14.635536657783613]
This paper aims to compare the performance of LMs in medical few-shot NER and answer How far is LMs from 100% Few-shot NER in Medical Domain.
Our findings clearly indicate that LLMs outperform SLMs in few-shot medical NER tasks, given the presence of suitable examples and appropriate logical frameworks.
We introduce a simple and effective method called textscRT (Retrieving and Thinking), which serves as retrievers, finding relevant examples, and as thinkers, employing a step-by-step reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-01T01:18:09Z) - Large Language Models Leverage External Knowledge to Extend Clinical
Insight Beyond Language Boundaries [48.48630043740588]
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and Med-PaLM have excelled in various medical question-answering tasks.
We develop a novel in-context learning framework to enhance their performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-17T12:31:26Z) - PMC-LLaMA: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Medicine [62.39105735933138]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding.
LLMs struggle in domains that require precision, such as medical applications, due to their lack of domain-specific knowledge.
We describe the procedure for building a powerful, open-source language model specifically designed for medicine applications, termed as PMC-LLaMA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-27T18:29:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.