Task Me Anything

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11775v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:32:42 GMT
• Title: Task Me Anything
• Authors: Jieyu Zhang, Weikai Huang, Zixian Ma, Oscar Michel, Dong He, Tanmay Gupta, Wei-Chiu Ma, Ali Farhadi, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Ranjay Krishna,
• Abstract summary: This paper produces a benchmark tailored to a user's needs. It contains 113K images, 10K videos, 2K 3D object assets, over 365 object categories, 655 attributes, and 335 relationships. It can generate 750M image/video question-answering pairs, which focus on evaluating perceptual capabilities.
• Score: 72.810309406219
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Benchmarks for large multimodal language models (MLMs) now serve to simultaneously assess the general capabilities of models instead of evaluating for a specific capability. As a result, when a developer wants to identify which models to use for their application, they are overwhelmed by the number of benchmarks and remain uncertain about which benchmark's results are most reflective of their specific use case. This paper introduces Task-Me-Anything, a benchmark generation engine which produces a benchmark tailored to a user's needs. Task-Me-Anything maintains an extendable taxonomy of visual assets and can programmatically generate a vast number of task instances. Additionally, it algorithmically addresses user queries regarding MLM performance efficiently within a computational budget. It contains 113K images, 10K videos, 2K 3D object assets, over 365 object categories, 655 attributes, and 335 relationships. It can generate 750M image/video question-answering pairs, which focus on evaluating MLM perceptual capabilities. Task-Me-Anything reveals critical insights: open-source MLMs excel in object and attribute recognition but lack spatial and temporal understanding; each model exhibits unique strengths and weaknesses; larger models generally perform better, though exceptions exist; and GPT4o demonstrates challenges in recognizing rotating/moving objects and distinguishing colors.

Related papers

• MC-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Context Visual Grounding in the Era of MLLMs [61.56904387052982]
  This paper proposes a new visual grounding task called multi-context visual grounding. It aims to localize instances of interest across multiple images based on open-ended text prompts. We benchmark over 20 state-of-the-art MLLMs and foundation models with potential multi-context visual grounding capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:52:57Z)
• UnifiedMLLM: Enabling Unified Representation for Multi-modal Multi-tasks With Large Language Model [11.885204227946549]
  We propose a comprehensive model designed to represent various tasks using a unified representation. Our model exhibits strong capabilities in comprehending the implicit intent of user instructions. Our approach exhibits exceptional scalability and generality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T14:27:39Z)
• MIBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models over Multiple Images [70.44423964171088]
  We propose a new benchmark MIBench, to comprehensively evaluate fine-grained abilities of MLLMs in multi-image scenarios. Specifically, MIBench categorizes the multi-image abilities into three scenarios: multi-image instruction (MII), multimodal knowledge-seeking (MKS) and multimodal in-context learning (MIC) The results reveal that although current models excel in single-image tasks, they exhibit significant shortcomings when faced with multi-image inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T21:22:58Z)
• Sign of the Times: Evaluating the use of Large Language Models for Idiomaticity Detection [2.2724928083094196]
  This work looks at the performance of a range of LLMs on three idiomaticity datasets: SemEval 2022 Task 2a, FLUTE, and MAGPIE. We find that whilst these models do give competitive performance, they do not match the results of fine-tuned task-specific models, even at the largest scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T11:55:14Z)
• SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs. SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions. We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z)
• InfiMM-Eval: Complex Open-Ended Reasoning Evaluation For Multi-Modal Large Language Models [50.03163753638256]
  Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly prominent in the field of artificial intelligence. Our benchmark comprises three key reasoning categories: deductive, abductive, and analogical reasoning. We evaluate a selection of representative MLLMs using this rigorously developed open-ended multi-step elaborate reasoning benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T07:06:31Z)
• Attributed Question Answering: Evaluation and Modeling for Attributed Large Language Models [68.37431984231338]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive results across a variety of tasks while requiring little or no direct supervision. We believe the ability of an LLM to an attribute to the text that it generates is likely to be crucial for both system developers and users in this setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T18:45:29Z)
• EvEntS ReaLM: Event Reasoning of Entity States via Language Models [24.077262847151232]
  Nominally, Large Language models (LLM) have been exposed to procedural knowledge about how objects interact, yet our benchmarking shows they fail to reason about the world. In particular, our results indicate that our prompting technique is especially useful for unseen attributes (out-of-domain) or when only limited data is available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T07:48:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.