Not as Simple as It Looked: Are We Concluding for Biased Arrest Practices?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11867v1
• Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 18:50:59 GMT
• Title: Not as Simple as It Looked: Are We Concluding for Biased Arrest Practices?
• Authors: Murat Ozer, Halil Akbas, Ismail Onat, Mehmet Bastug, Arif Akgul, Nelly ElSayed, Zag ElSayed, Multu Koseli, Niyazi Ekici,
• Abstract summary: The study categorizes explanations into types of place, types of person, and a combination of both. The analysis of violent arrest outcomes reveals approximately 40 percent of the observed variation attributed to neighborhood-level characteristics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This study examines racial disparities in violent arrest outcomes, challenging conventional methods through a nuanced analysis of Cincinnati Police Department data. Acknowledging the intricate nature of racial disparity, the study categorizes explanations into types of place, types of person, and a combination of both, emphasizing the impact of neighborhood characteristics on crime distribution and police deployment. By introducing alternative scenarios, such as spuriousness, directed policing, and the geo-concentration of racial groups, the study underscores the complexity of racial disparity calculations. Employing a case study approach, the analysis of violent arrest outcomes reveals approximately 40 percent of the observed variation attributed to neighborhood-level characteristics, with concentrated disadvantage neutralizing the influence of race on arrest rates. Contrary to expectations, the study challenges the notion of unintentional racism, suggesting that neighborhood factors play a more significant role than the racial composition in explaining arrests. Policymakers are urged to focus on comprehensive community development initiatives addressing socioeconomic inequalities and support the development of robust racial disparity indices. The study calls for nuanced explorations of unintentional racism and future research addressing potential limitations, aiming to enhance understanding of the complexities surrounding racial disparities in arrests.

Related papers

• The Factuality Tax of Diversity-Intervened Text-to-Image Generation: Benchmark and Fact-Augmented Intervention [61.80236015147771]
  We quantify the trade-off between using diversity interventions and preserving demographic factuality in T2I models. Experiments on DoFaiR reveal that diversity-oriented instructions increase the number of different gender and racial groups. We propose Fact-Augmented Intervention (FAI) to reflect on verbalized or retrieved factual information about gender and racial compositions of generation subjects in history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T09:09:42Z)
• Evidence of What, for Whom? The Socially Contested Role of Algorithmic Bias in a Predictive Policing Tool [0.9821874476902969]
  We show that stakeholders from different groups articulate diverse problem diagnoses of the tool's algorithmic bias. We find that stakeholders use evidence of algorithmic bias to reform the policies around police patrol allocation. We identify the implicit assumptions and scope of these varied uses of algorithmic bias as evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T13:03:33Z)
• A Causal Framework to Evaluate Racial Bias in Law Enforcement Systems [13.277413612930102]
  We present a multi-stage causal framework incorporating criminality. In settings like airport security, the primary source of observed bias against a race is likely to be bias in law enforcement against innocents of that race. In police-civilian interaction, the primary source of observed bias against a race could be bias in law enforcement against that race or bias from the general public in reporting against the other race.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T20:41:43Z)
• An Empirical Analysis of Racial Categories in the Algorithmic Fairness Literature [2.2713084727838115]
  We analyze how race is conceptualized and formalized in algorithmic fairness frameworks. We find that differing notions of race are adopted inconsistently, at times even within a single analysis. We argue that the construction of racial categories is a value-laden process with significant social and political consequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T21:23:29Z)
• Social Diversity Reduces the Complexity and Cost of Fostering Fairness [63.70639083665108]
  We investigate the effects of interference mechanisms which assume incomplete information and flexible standards of fairness. We quantify the role of diversity and show how it reduces the need for information gathering. Our results indicate that diversity changes and opens up novel mechanisms available to institutions wishing to promote fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T21:58:35Z)
• Toward Understanding Bias Correlations for Mitigation in NLP [34.956581421295]
  This work aims to provide a first systematic study toward understanding bias correlations in mitigation. We examine bias mitigation in two common NLP tasks -- toxicity detection and word embeddings. Our findings suggest that biases are correlated and present scenarios in which independent debiasing approaches may be insufficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T22:48:47Z)
• Statistical discrimination in learning agents [64.78141757063142]
  Statistical discrimination emerges in agent policies as a function of both the bias in the training population and of agent architecture. We show that less discrimination emerges with agents that use recurrent neural networks, and when their training environment has less bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T18:28:57Z)
• Detecting Racial Bias in Jury Selection [0.7106986689736826]
  APM Reports collated historical court records to assess whether the State exhibited a racial bias in striking potential jurors. This analysis used backward stepwise logistic regression to conclude that race was a significant factor. We apply Optimal Feature Selection to identify the globally-optimal subset of features and affirm that there is significant evidence of racial bias in the strike decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-22T13:47:33Z)
• One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Vision [75.82110684355979]
  We study the racial system encoded by computer vision datasets supplying categorical race labels for face images. We find that each dataset encodes a substantially unique racial system, despite nominally equivalent racial categories. We find evidence that racial categories encode stereotypes, and exclude ethnic groups from categories on the basis of nonconformity to stereotypes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-03T22:50:04Z)
• The effect of differential victim crime reporting on predictive policing systems [84.86615754515252]
  We show how differential victim crime reporting rates can lead to outcome disparities in common crime hot spot prediction models. Our results suggest that differential crime reporting rates can lead to a displacement of predicted hotspots from high crime but low reporting areas to high or medium crime and high reporting areas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T01:57:22Z)
• Exploring Spatio-Temporal and Cross-Type Correlations for Crime Prediction [48.1813701535167]
  We perform crime prediction exploiting the cross-type and-temporal correlations of urban crimes. We propose a coherent framework to mathematically model these correlations for crime prediction. Further experiments have been conducted to understand the importance of different correlations in crime prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-20T00:34:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.