Should AI Optimize Your Code? A Comparative Study of Classical Optimizing Compilers Versus Current Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12146v2
• Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 17:22:18 GMT
• Title: Should AI Optimize Your Code? A Comparative Study of Classical Optimizing Compilers Versus Current Large Language Models
• Authors: Miguel Romero Rosas, Miguel Torres Sanchez, Rudolf Eigenmann,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) raise intriguing questions about the potential of these AI approaches to revolutionize code optimization.<n>This work aims to answer an essential question for the compiler community: "Can AI-driven models revolutionize the way we approach code optimization?"<n>We present a comparative analysis between three classical optimizing compilers and two recent large language models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Traditional optimizing compilers have played an important role in adapting to the growing complexity of modern software systems. The need for efficient parallel programming in current architectures requires strong optimization techniques. The beginning of Large Language Models (LLMs) raises intriguing questions about the potential of these AI approaches to revolutionize code optimization methodologies. This work aims to answer an essential question for the compiler community: "Can AI-driven models revolutionize the way we approach code optimization?". To address this question, we present a comparative analysis between three classical optimizing compilers and two recent large language models, evaluating their respective abilities and limitations in optimizing code for maximum efficiency. In addition, we introduce a benchmark suite of challenging optimization patterns and an automatic mechanism for evaluating the performance and correctness of the code generated by LLMs. We used three different prompting strategies to evaluate the performance of the LLMs, Simple Instruction (IP), Detailed Instruction Prompting (DIP), and Chain of Thought (CoT). A key finding is that while LLMs have the potential to outperform current optimizing compilers, they often generate incorrect code on large code sizes, calling for automated verification methods. In addition, expressing a compiler strategy as part of the LLMs prompt substantially improves its overall performance. Our evaluation across three benchmark suites shows CodeLlama-70B as the superior LLM, capable of achieving speedups of up to x1.75. Additionally, CETUS is the best among the current optimizing compilers, achieving a maximum speedup of 1.67x. We also found substantial differences among the three prompting strategies.

Related papers

• PerfCodeGen: Improving Performance of LLM Generated Code with Execution Feedback [78.89596149768458]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely adopted for assisting in software development tasks. We propose PerfCodeGen, a training-free framework that enhances the performance of LLM-generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T06:22:38Z)
• Search-Based LLMs for Code Optimization [16.843870288512363]
  Code written by developers usually suffers from efficiency problems and contain various performance bugs. Recent work regards the task as a sequence generation problem, and resorts to deep learning (DL) techniques such as large language models (LLMs) We propose a search-based LLMs framework named SBLLM that enables iterative refinement and discovery of improved optimization methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T06:59:46Z)
• Iterative or Innovative? A Problem-Oriented Perspective for Code Optimization [81.88668100203913]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in solving a wide range of programming tasks. In this paper, we explore code optimization with a focus on performance enhancement, specifically aiming to optimize code for minimal execution time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T16:10:10Z)
• LLM as a Complementary Optimizer to Gradient Descent: A Case Study in Prompt Tuning [69.95292905263393]
  We show that gradient-based and high-level LLMs can effectively collaborate a combined optimization framework. In this paper, we show that these complementary to each other and can effectively collaborate a combined optimization framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T06:24:14Z)
• CompilerDream: Learning a Compiler World Model for General Code Optimization [58.87557583347996]
  We introduce CompilerDream, a model-based reinforcement learning approach to general code optimization. It comprises a compiler world model that accurately simulates the intrinsic properties of optimization passes and an agent trained on this model to produce effective optimization strategies. It excels across diverse datasets, surpassing LLVM's built-in optimizations and other state-of-the-art methods in both settings of value prediction and end-to-end code optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T09:20:33Z)
• Large Language Models for Compiler Optimization [22.52765975286403]
  We present a transformer model trained from scratch to optimize LLVM assembly for code size. We ask the model to predict the instruction counts before and after optimization, and the optimized code itself. Our approach achieves a 3.0% improvement in reducing instruction counts over the compiler.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-11T22:11:46Z)
• Large Language Models as Optimizers [106.52386531624532]
  We propose Optimization by PROmpting (OPRO), a simple and effective approach to leverage large language models (LLMs) as prompts. In each optimization step, the LLM generates new solutions from the prompt that contains previously generated solutions with their values. We demonstrate that the best prompts optimized by OPRO outperform human-designed prompts by up to 8% on GSM8K, and by up to 50% on Big-Bench Hard tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T00:07:15Z)
• Learning Performance-Improving Code Edits [107.21538852090208]
  We introduce a framework for adapting large language models (LLMs) to high-level program optimization. First, we curate a dataset of performance-improving edits made by human programmers of over 77,000 competitive C++ programming submission pairs. For prompting, we propose retrieval-based few-shot prompting and chain-of-thought, and for finetuning, these include performance-conditioned generation and synthetic data augmentation based on self-play.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T18:59:21Z)
• Learning to Superoptimize Real-world Programs [79.4140991035247]
  We propose a framework to learn to superoptimize real-world programs by using neural sequence-to-sequence models. We introduce the Big Assembly benchmark, a dataset consisting of over 25K real-world functions mined from open-source projects in x86-64 assembly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T05:33:21Z)
• Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmark [94.29436694770953]
  Learning to optimize (L2O) is an emerging approach that leverages machine learning to develop optimization methods. This article is poised to be the first comprehensive survey and benchmark of L2O for continuous optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T20:46:20Z)
• Static Neural Compiler Optimization via Deep Reinforcement Learning [1.458855293397494]
  In this paper, we employ a deep reinforcement learning approach to the phase-ordering problem. Provided with sub-sequences constituting LLVM's O3 sequence, our agent learns to outperform the O3 sequence on the set of source codes used for training. We believe that the models trained using our approach can be integrated into modern compilers as neural optimization agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-20T13:16:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.