Code Agents are State of the Art Software Testers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12952v1
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:54:37 GMT
- Title: Code Agents are State of the Art Software Testers
- Authors: Niels Mündler, Mark Niklas Müller, Jingxuan He, Martin Vechev,
- Abstract summary: We investigate the capability of LLM-based Code Agents for formalizing user issues into test cases.
We propose a novel benchmark based on popular GitHub repositories, containing real-world issues, ground-truth patches, and golden tests.
We find that LLMs generally perform surprisingly well at generating relevant test cases with Code Agents designed for code repair.
- Score: 10.730852617039451
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Rigorous software testing is crucial for developing and maintaining high-quality code, making automated test generation a promising avenue for both improving software quality and boosting the effectiveness of code generation methods. However, while code generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) is an extraordinarily active research area, test generation remains relatively unexplored. We address this gap and investigate the capability of LLM-based Code Agents for formalizing user issues into test cases. To this end, we propose a novel benchmark based on popular GitHub repositories, containing real-world issues, ground-truth patches, and golden tests. We find that LLMs generally perform surprisingly well at generating relevant test cases with Code Agents designed for code repair exceeding the performance of systems designed specifically for test generation. Further, as test generation is a similar but more structured task than code generation, it allows for a more fine-grained analysis using fail-to-pass rate and coverage metrics, providing a dual metric for analyzing systems designed for code repair. Finally, we find that generated tests are an effective filter for proposed code fixes, doubling the precision of SWE-Agent.
Related papers
- CodeRAG-Bench: Can Retrieval Augment Code Generation? [78.37076502395699]
We conduct a systematic, large-scale analysis of code generation using retrieval-augmented generation.
We first curate a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, CodeRAG-Bench, encompassing three categories of code generation tasks.
We examine top-performing models on CodeRAG-Bench by providing contexts retrieved from one or multiple sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T16:59:52Z) - VersiCode: Towards Version-controllable Code Generation [58.82709231906735]
We introduce VersiCode, the first comprehensive dataset designed to assess the ability of large language models to generate verifiable code for specific library versions.
We design two dedicated evaluation tasks: version-specific code completion (VSCC) and version-aware code editing (VACE)
Comprehensive experiments are conducted to benchmark the performance of LLMs, revealing the challenging nature of these tasks and VersiCode.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T16:15:06Z) - TESTEVAL: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Test Case Generation [15.343859279282848]
We propose TESTEVAL, a novel benchmark for test case generation with large language models (LLMs)
We collect 210 Python programs from an online programming platform, LeetCode, and design three different tasks: overall coverage, targeted line/branch coverage, and targeted path coverage.
We find that generating test cases to cover specific program lines/branches/paths is still challenging for current LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T22:07:50Z) - Large Language Models as Test Case Generators: Performance Evaluation and Enhancement [3.5398126682962587]
We study how well Large Language Models can generate high-quality test cases.
We propose a multi-agent framework called emphTestChain that decouples the generation of test inputs and test outputs.
Our results indicate that TestChain outperforms the baseline by a large margin.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-20T10:27:01Z) - InfiBench: Evaluating the Question-Answering Capabilities of Code Large Language Models [56.723509505549536]
InfiBench is the first large-scale freeform question-answering (QA) benchmark for code to our knowledge.
It comprises 234 carefully selected high-quality Stack Overflow questions that span across 15 programming languages.
We conduct a systematic evaluation for over 100 latest code LLMs on InfiBench, leading to a series of novel and insightful findings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T02:06:30Z) - RepoAgent: An LLM-Powered Open-Source Framework for Repository-level
Code Documentation Generation [79.83270415843857]
We introduce RepoAgent, a large language model powered open-source framework aimed at proactively generating, maintaining, and updating code documentation.
We have validated the effectiveness of our approach, showing that RepoAgent excels in generating high-quality repository-level documentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T15:39:52Z) - Test-Driven Development for Code Generation [0.850206009406913]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in generating code snippets directly from problem statements.
This paper investigates if and how Test-Driven Development (TDD) can be incorporated into AI-assisted code-generation processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T04:10:12Z) - StepCoder: Improve Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from
Compiler Feedback [58.20547418182074]
We introduce StepCoder, a novel framework for code generation, consisting of two main components.
CCCS addresses the exploration challenge by breaking the long sequences code generation task into a Curriculum of Code Completion Subtasks.
FGO only optimize the model by masking the unexecuted code segments to provide Fine-Grained Optimization.
Our method improves the ability to explore the output space and outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T13:14:31Z) - Code-Aware Prompting: A study of Coverage Guided Test Generation in Regression Setting using LLM [32.44432906540792]
We present SymPrompt, a code-aware prompting strategy for large language models in test generation.
SymPrompt enhances correct test generations by a factor of 5 and bolsters relative coverage by 26% for CodeGen2.
Notably, when applied to GPT-4, SymPrompt improves coverage by over 2x compared to baseline prompting strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-31T18:21:49Z) - AgentCoder: Multi-Agent-based Code Generation with Iterative Testing and Optimisation [11.155351560550853]
This paper introduces Multi-Agent Assistant Code Generation (AgentCoder)
AgentCoder is a novel solution comprising a multi-agent framework with specialized agents: the programmer agent, the test designer agent, and the test executor agent.
Our experiments on 9 code generation models and 12 enhancement approaches showcase AgentCoder's superior performance over existing code generation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-20T13:22:41Z) - CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Tests [49.622590050797236]
We explore the use of pre-trained language models to automatically generate test cases.
CodeT executes the code solutions using the generated test cases, and then chooses the best solution.
We evaluate CodeT on five different pre-trained models with both HumanEval and MBPP benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-21T10:18:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.