CityBench: Evaluating the Capabilities of Large Language Model as World Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13945v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:25:07 GMT
• Title: CityBench: Evaluating the Capabilities of Large Language Model as World Model
• Authors: Jie Feng, Jun Zhang, Junbo Yan, Xin Zhang, Tianjian Ouyang, Tianhui Liu, Yuwei Du, Siqi Guo, Yong Li,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) with powerful generalization ability have been widely used in many domains. In this paper, we propose CityBench, an interactive simulator based evaluation platform. We design 7 tasks in 2 categories of perception-understanding and decision-making group to evaluate the capability of LLMs as city-scale world model for urban domain.
• Score: 10.22654338686634
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) with powerful generalization ability has been widely used in many domains. A systematic and reliable evaluation of LLMs is a crucial step in their development and applications, especially for specific professional fields. In the urban domain, there have been some early explorations about the usability of LLMs, but a systematic and scalable evaluation benchmark is still lacking. The challenge in constructing a systematic evaluation benchmark for the urban domain lies in the diversity of data and scenarios, as well as the complex and dynamic nature of cities. In this paper, we propose CityBench, an interactive simulator based evaluation platform, as the first systematic evaluation benchmark for the capability of LLMs for urban domain. First, we build CitySim to integrate the multi-source data and simulate fine-grained urban dynamics. Based on CitySim, we design 7 tasks in 2 categories of perception-understanding and decision-making group to evaluate the capability of LLMs as city-scale world model for urban domain. Due to the flexibility and ease-of-use of CitySim, our evaluation platform CityBench can be easily extended to any city in the world. We evaluate 13 well-known LLMs including open source LLMs and commercial LLMs in 13 cities around the world. Extensive experiments demonstrate the scalability and effectiveness of proposed CityBench and shed lights for the future development of LLMs in urban domain. The dataset, benchmark and source codes are openly accessible to the research community via https://github.com/tsinghua-fib-lab/CityBench

Related papers

• OpenCity: A Scalable Platform to Simulate Urban Activities with Massive LLM Agents [10.919679349212426]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to the development of LLM agents capable of simulating urban activities with unprecedented realism. We propose OpenCity, a scalable simulation platform optimized for both system and prompt efficiencies. OpenCity achieves a 600-fold acceleration in simulation time per agent, a 70% reduction in LLM requests, and a 50% reduction in token usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T13:52:35Z)
• UrBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models in Multi-View Urban Scenarios [60.492736455572015]
  We present UrBench, a benchmark designed for evaluating LMMs in complex multi-view urban scenarios. UrBench contains 11.6K meticulously curated questions at both region-level and role-level. Our evaluations on 21 LMMs show that current LMMs struggle in the urban environments in several aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T13:13:35Z)
• CIBench: Evaluating Your LLMs with a Code Interpreter Plugin [68.95137938214862]
  We propose an interactive evaluation framework, named CIBench, to comprehensively assess LLMs' ability to utilize code interpreters for data science tasks. The evaluation dataset is constructed using an LLM-human cooperative approach and simulates an authentic workflow by leveraging consecutive and interactive IPython sessions. We conduct extensive experiments to analyze the ability of 24 LLMs on CIBench and provide valuable insights for future LLMs in code interpreter utilization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T07:43:55Z)
• CityGPT: Empowering Urban Spatial Cognition of Large Language Models [7.40606412920065]
  Large language models (LLMs) with powerful language generation and reasoning capabilities have already achieved success in many domains. However, due to the lacking of physical world's corpus and knowledge during training, they usually fail to solve many real-life tasks in the urban space. We propose CityGPT, a systematic framework for enhancing the capability of LLMs on understanding urban space and solving the related urban tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T02:32:16Z)
• EgoPlan-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models for Human-Level Planning [84.6451394629312]
  We introduce EgoPlan-Bench, a benchmark to evaluate the planning abilities of MLLMs in real-world scenarios. We show that EgoPlan-Bench poses significant challenges, highlighting a substantial scope for improvement in MLLMs to achieve human-level task planning. We also present EgoPlan-IT, a specialized instruction-tuning dataset that effectively enhances model performance on EgoPlan-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T03:35:58Z)
• Chatmap : Large Language Model Interaction with Cartographic Data [0.0]
  OpenStreetMap (OSM) is the most ambitious open-source global initiative offering detailed urban and rural geographic data. In this study, we demonstrate the proof of concept and details of the process of fine-tuning a relatively small scale (1B parameters) Large Language Models (LLMs) with a relatively small artificial dataset curated by a more capable teacher model. The study aims to provide an initial guideline for such generative artificial intelligence (AI) adaptations and demonstrate early signs of useful emerging abilities in this context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T15:32:36Z)
• A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models [87.60417393701331]
  Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry. This paper focuses on three key dimensions: what to evaluate, where to evaluate, and how to evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T16:28:35Z)
• KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models [87.96683299084788]
  We construct a Knowledge-oriented LLM Assessment benchmark (KoLA) We mimic human cognition to form a four-level taxonomy of knowledge-related abilities, covering $19$ tasks. We use both Wikipedia, a corpus prevalently pre-trained by LLMs, along with continuously collected emerging corpora, to evaluate the capacity to handle unseen data and evolving knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T17:20:46Z)
• LVLM-eHub: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [55.304181390027274]
  This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of publicly available large multimodal models by building a LVLM evaluation Hub (LVLM-eHub) Our LVLM-eHub consists of $8$ representative LVLMs such as InstructBLIP and MiniGPT-4, which are thoroughly evaluated by a quantitative capability evaluation and an online arena platform. The study reveals several innovative findings. First, instruction-tuned LVLM with massive in-domain data such as InstructBLIP heavily overfits many existing tasks, generalizing poorly in the open-world scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T16:39:24Z)
• On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models (A Critical Investigation with a Proposed Benchmark) [30.223130782579336]
  We develop a benchmark suite based on the kinds of domains employed in the International Planning Competition. We evaluate LLMs in three modes: autonomous, human-in-the-loop and human-in-the-loop. Our results show that LLM's ability to autonomously generate executable plans is quite meager, averaging only about 3% success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T21:37:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.