Understanding Different Design Choices in Training Large Time Series Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14045v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:09:19 GMT
• Title: Understanding Different Design Choices in Training Large Time Series Models
• Authors: Yu-Neng Chuang, Songchen Li, Jiayi Yuan, Guanchu Wang, Kwei-Herng Lai, Leisheng Yu, Sirui Ding, Chia-Yuan Chang, Qiaoyu Tan, Daochen Zha, Xia Hu,
• Abstract summary: Training Large Time Series Models (LTSMs) on heterogeneous time series data poses unique challenges. We propose emphtime series prompt, a novel statistical prompting strategy tailored to time series data. We introduce textttLTSM-bundle, which bundles the best design choices we have identified.
• Score: 71.20102277299445
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Inspired by Large Language Models (LLMs), Time Series Forecasting (TSF), a long-standing task in time series analysis, is undergoing a transition towards Large Time Series Models (LTSMs), aiming to train universal transformer-based models for TSF. However, training LTSMs on heterogeneous time series data poses unique challenges, including diverse frequencies, dimensions, and patterns across datasets. Recent endeavors have studied and evaluated various design choices aimed at enhancing LTSM training and generalization capabilities, spanning pre-processing techniques, model configurations, and dataset configurations. In this work, we comprehensively analyze these design choices and aim to identify the best practices for training LTSM. Moreover, we propose \emph{time series prompt}, a novel statistical prompting strategy tailored to time series data. Furthermore, based on the observations in our analysis, we introduce \texttt{LTSM-bundle}, which bundles the best design choices we have identified. Empirical results demonstrate that \texttt{LTSM-bundle} achieves superior zero-shot and few-shot performances compared to state-of-the-art LSTMs and traditional TSF methods on benchmark datasets.

Related papers

• Metadata Matters for Time Series: Informative Forecasting with Transformers [70.38241681764738]
  We propose a Metadata-informed Time Series Transformer (MetaTST) for time series forecasting. To tackle the unstructured nature of metadata, MetaTST formalizes them into natural languages by pre-designed templates. A Transformer encoder is employed to communicate series and metadata tokens, which can extend series representations by metadata information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T11:37:55Z)
• Deep Time Series Models: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmark [74.28364194333447]
  Time series data is of great significance in real-world scenarios. Recent years have witnessed remarkable breakthroughs in the time series community. We release Time Series Library (TSLib) as a fair benchmark of deep time series models for diverse analysis tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T08:31:55Z)
• UniCL: A Universal Contrastive Learning Framework for Large Time Series Models [18.005358506435847]
  Time-series analysis plays a pivotal role across a range of critical applications, from finance to healthcare. Traditional supervised learning methods first annotate extensive labels for time-series data in each task. This paper introduces UniCL, a universal and scalable contrastive learning framework designed for pretraining time-series foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T07:47:11Z)
• Attractor Memory for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting: A Chaos Perspective [63.60312929416228]
  textbftextitAttraos incorporates chaos theory into long-term time series forecasting. We show that Attraos outperforms various LTSF methods on mainstream datasets and chaotic datasets with only one-twelfth of the parameters compared to PatchTST.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T05:35:01Z)
• MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation Models [19.0845213853369]
  We introduce MOMENT, a family of open-source foundation models for general-purpose time series analysis. We compile a collection of public time series, called the Time series Pile, and systematically tackle time series-specific challenges. We build on recent work to design a benchmark to evaluate time series foundation models on diverse tasks and datasets in limited supervision settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T10:48:46Z)
• Unified Training of Universal Time Series Forecasting Transformers [104.56318980466742]
  We present a Masked-based Universal Time Series Forecasting Transformer (Moirai) Moirai is trained on our newly introduced Large-scale Open Time Series Archive (LOTSA) featuring over 27B observations across nine domains. Moirai achieves competitive or superior performance as a zero-shot forecaster when compared to full-shot models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T20:00:45Z)
• Timer: Generative Pre-trained Transformers Are Large Time Series Models [83.03091523806668]
  This paper aims at the early development of large time series models (LTSM) During pre-training, we curate large-scale datasets with up to 1 billion time points. To meet diverse application needs, we convert forecasting, imputation, and anomaly detection of time series into a unified generative task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T06:55:55Z)
• TEMPO: Prompt-based Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Time Series Forecasting [24.834846119163885]
  We propose a novel framework, TEMPO, that can effectively learn time series representations. TEMPO expands the capability for dynamically modeling real-world temporal phenomena from data within diverse domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T00:02:25Z)
• Unified Long-Term Time-Series Forecasting Benchmark [0.6526824510982802]
  We present a comprehensive dataset designed explicitly for long-term time-series forecasting. We incorporate a collection of datasets obtained from diverse, dynamic systems and real-life records. To determine the most effective model in diverse scenarios, we conduct an extensive benchmarking analysis using classical and state-of-the-art models. Our findings reveal intriguing performance comparisons among these models, highlighting the dataset-dependent nature of model effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T18:59:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.