A Tale of Trust and Accuracy: Base vs. Instruct LLMs in RAG Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.14972v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:31:02 GMT
- Title: A Tale of Trust and Accuracy: Base vs. Instruct LLMs in RAG Systems
- Authors: Florin Cuconasu, Giovanni Trappolini, Nicola Tonellotto, Fabrizio Silvestri,
- Abstract summary: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence.
Current common practices in RAG involve using "instructed" language models (LLMs)
Our study demonstrates that base models outperform their instructed counterparts in RAG tasks by 20% on average under our experimental settings.
- Score: 14.72046677914345
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence combining a retrieval phase with a generative phase, with the latter typically being powered by large language models (LLMs). The current common practices in RAG involve using "instructed" LLMs, which are fine-tuned with supervised training to enhance their ability to follow instructions and are aligned with human preferences using state-of-the-art techniques. Contrary to popular belief, our study demonstrates that base models outperform their instructed counterparts in RAG tasks by 20% on average under our experimental settings. This finding challenges the prevailing assumptions about the superiority of instructed LLMs in RAG applications. Further investigations reveal a more nuanced situation, questioning fundamental aspects of RAG and suggesting the need for broader discussions on the topic; or, as Fromm would have it, "Seldom is a glance at the statistics enough to understand the meaning of the figures".
Related papers
- Speculative RAG: Enhancing Retrieval Augmented Generation through Drafting [68.90949377014742]
Speculative RAG is a framework that leverages a larger generalist LM to efficiently verify multiple RAG drafts produced in parallel by a smaller, distilled specialist LM.
Our method accelerates RAG by delegating drafting to the smaller specialist LM, with the larger generalist LM performing a single verification pass over the drafts.
It notably enhances accuracy by up to 12.97% while reducing latency by 51% compared to conventional RAG systems on PubHealth.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-11T06:50:19Z) - RankRAG: Unifying Context Ranking with Retrieval-Augmented Generation in LLMs [60.38044044203333]
Large language models (LLMs) typically utilize the top-k contexts from a retriever in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
We propose a novel instruction fine-tuning framework RankRAG, which instruction-tunes a single LLM for the dual purpose of context ranking and answer generation in RAG.
For generation, we compare our model with many strong baselines, including GPT-4-0613, GPT-4-turbo-2024-0409, and ChatQA-1.5, an open-sourced model with the state-of-the-art performance on RAG benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T17:59:17Z) - BERGEN: A Benchmarking Library for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [26.158785168036662]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation allows to enhance Large Language Models with external knowledge.
Inconsistent benchmarking poses a major challenge in comparing approaches and understanding the impact of each component in the pipeline.
In this work, we study best practices that lay the groundwork for a systematic evaluation of RAG and present BERGEN, an end-to-end library for reproducible research standardizing RAG experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T09:09:27Z) - A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [71.25225058845324]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated revolutionary abilities in language understanding and generation.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can offer reliable and up-to-date external knowledge.
RA-LLMs have emerged to harness external and authoritative knowledge bases, rather than relying on the model's internal knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T02:48:45Z) - ARAGOG: Advanced RAG Output Grading [44.99833362998488]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is essential for integrating external knowledge into Large Language Model (LLM) outputs.
This study assesses various RAG methods' impacts on retrieval precision and answer similarity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T10:43:52Z) - Unsupervised Information Refinement Training of Large Language Models for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [128.01050030936028]
We propose an information refinement training method named InFO-RAG.
InFO-RAG is low-cost and general across various tasks.
It improves the performance of LLaMA2 by an average of 9.39% relative points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T08:24:38Z) - The Power of Noise: Redefining Retrieval for RAG Systems [19.387105120040157]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a method to extend beyond the pre-trained knowledge of Large Language Models.
We focus on the type of passages IR systems within a RAG solution should retrieve.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-26T14:14:59Z) - Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through
Self-Reflection [74.51523859064802]
We introduce a new framework called Self-Reflective Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Self-RAG)
Self-RAG enhances an LM's quality and factuality through retrieval and self-reflection.
It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs and retrieval-augmented models on a diverse set of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T18:18:32Z) - Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [53.504471079548]
We systematically investigate the impact of Retrieval-Augmented Generation on large language models.
We analyze the performance of different large language models in 4 fundamental abilities required for RAG.
We establish Retrieval-Augmented Generation Benchmark (RGB), a new corpus for RAG evaluation in both English and Chinese.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-04T08:28:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.