PID: Prompt-Independent Data Protection Against Latent Diffusion Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15305v1
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 11:56:42 GMT
- Title: PID: Prompt-Independent Data Protection Against Latent Diffusion Models
- Authors: Ang Li, Yichuan Mo, Mingjie Li, Yisen Wang,
- Abstract summary: Given the vast amount of personal images accessible online, this capability raises critical concerns about civil privacy.
We propose a simple yet effective method called textbfPrompt-Independent Defense (PID) to safeguard privacy against LDMs.
- Score: 32.1299481922554
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The few-shot fine-tuning of Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) has enabled them to grasp new concepts from a limited number of images. However, given the vast amount of personal images accessible online, this capability raises critical concerns about civil privacy. While several previous defense methods have been developed to prevent such misuse of LDMs, they typically assume that the textual prompts used by data protectors exactly match those employed by data exploiters. In this paper, we first empirically demonstrate that breaking this assumption, i.e., in cases where discrepancies exist between the textual conditions used by protectors and exploiters, could substantially reduce the effectiveness of these defenses. Furthermore, considering the visual encoder's independence from textual prompts, we delve into the visual encoder and thoroughly investigate how manipulating the visual encoder affects the few-shot fine-tuning process of LDMs. Drawing on these insights, we propose a simple yet effective method called \textbf{Prompt-Independent Defense (PID)} to safeguard privacy against LDMs. We show that PID can act as a strong privacy shield on its own while requiring significantly less computational power. We believe our studies, along with the comprehensive understanding and new defense method, provide a notable advance toward reliable data protection against LDMs.
Related papers
- Effective and Efficient Adversarial Detection for Vision-Language Models via A Single Vector [97.92369017531038]
We build a new laRge-scale Adervsarial images dataset with Diverse hArmful Responses (RADAR)
We then develop a novel iN-time Embedding-based AdveRSarial Image DEtection (NEARSIDE) method, which exploits a single vector that distilled from the hidden states of Visual Language Models (VLMs) to achieve the detection of adversarial images against benign ones in the input.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T10:33:10Z) - Pixel Is Not A Barrier: An Effective Evasion Attack for Pixel-Domain Diffusion Models [9.905296922309157]
Diffusion Models have emerged as powerful generative models for high-quality image synthesis, with many subsequent image editing techniques based on them.
Previous works have attempted to safeguard images from diffusion-based editing by adding imperceptible perturbations.
Our work proposes a novel attacking framework with a feature representation attack loss that exploits vulnerabilities in denoising UNets and a latent optimization strategy to enhance the naturalness of protected images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-21T17:56:34Z) - Pixel is a Barrier: Diffusion Models Are More Adversarially Robust Than We Think [14.583181596370386]
Adversarial examples for diffusion models are widely used as solutions for safety concerns.
This may mislead us to think that the diffusion models are vulnerable to adversarial attacks like most deep models.
In this paper, we show novel findings that: even though gradient-based white-box attacks can be used to attack the LDMs, they fail to attack PDMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-20T08:28:43Z) - Latent Diffusion Models for Attribute-Preserving Image Anonymization [4.080920304681247]
This paper presents the first approach to image anonymization based on Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs)
We propose two LDMs for this purpose: CAFLaGE-Base exploits a combination of pre-trained ControlNets, and a new controlling mechanism designed to increase the distance between the real and anonymized images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:09:21Z) - Visual Privacy Auditing with Diffusion Models [52.866433097406656]
We propose a reconstruction attack based on diffusion models (DMs) that assumes adversary access to real-world image priors.
We show that (1) real-world data priors significantly influence reconstruction success, (2) current reconstruction bounds do not model the risk posed by data priors well, and (3) DMs can serve as effective auditing tools for visualizing privacy leakage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T12:18:55Z) - Silent Guardian: Protecting Text from Malicious Exploitation by Large Language Models [63.91178922306669]
We introduce Silent Guardian, a text protection mechanism against large language models (LLMs)
By carefully modifying the text to be protected, TPE can induce LLMs to first sample the end token, thus directly terminating the interaction.
We show that SG can effectively protect the target text under various configurations and achieve almost 100% protection success rate in some cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T10:30:36Z) - PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind)
Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques.
In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z) - Toward effective protection against diffusion based mimicry through
score distillation [15.95715097030366]
Efforts have been made to add perturbations to protect images from diffusion-based mimicry pipelines.
Most of the existing methods are too ineffective and even impractical to be used by individual users.
We present novel findings on attacking latent diffusion models and propose new plug-and-play strategies for more effective protection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T18:56:12Z) - Defending Pre-trained Language Models as Few-shot Learners against
Backdoor Attacks [72.03945355787776]
We advocate MDP, a lightweight, pluggable, and effective defense for PLMs as few-shot learners.
We show analytically that MDP creates an interesting dilemma for the attacker to choose between attack effectiveness and detection evasiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-23T04:41:55Z) - The Devil's Advocate: Shattering the Illusion of Unexploitable Data
using Diffusion Models [14.018862290487617]
We show that a carefully designed denoising process can counteract the data-protecting perturbations.
Our approach, called AVATAR, delivers state-of-the-art performance against a suite of recent availability attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-15T10:20:49Z) - Defending against Reconstruction Attacks with R\'enyi Differential
Privacy [72.1188520352079]
Reconstruction attacks allow an adversary to regenerate data samples of the training set using access to only a trained model.
Differential privacy is a known solution to such attacks, but is often used with a relatively large privacy budget.
We show that, for a same mechanism, we can derive privacy guarantees for reconstruction attacks that are better than the traditional ones from the literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-15T18:09:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.