ExpShield: Safeguarding Web Text from Unauthorized Crawling and Language Modeling Exploitation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.21123v1
• Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:52:02 GMT
• Title: ExpShield: Safeguarding Web Text from Unauthorized Crawling and Language Modeling Exploitation
• Authors: Ruixuan Liu, Toan Tran, Tianhao Wang, Hongsheng Hu, Shuo Wang, Li Xiong,
• Abstract summary: We propose a proactive self-guard mechanism that embeds invisible perturbations into text to limit misuse in model training.<n>This approach enables data owners to protect sensitive content directly, without relying on a third-party to perform defense.
• Score: 17.71790411163849
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) increasingly depend on web-scraped datasets, concerns over unauthorized use of copyrighted or personal content for training have intensified. Despite regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), data owners still have limited control over the use of their content in model training. To address this, we propose ExpShield, a proactive self-guard mechanism that empowers content owners to embed invisible perturbations into their text, limiting data misuse in LLMs training without affecting readability. This preemptive approach enables data owners to protect sensitive content directly, without relying on a third-party to perform defense. Starting from the random perturbation, we demonstrate the rationale for using perturbation to conceal protected content. We further enhance the efficiency by identifying memorization triggers and creating pitfalls to diverge the model memorization in a more focused way. To validate our defense's effectiveness, we propose a novel metric of instance exploitation which captures the individual risk raised by model training. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach as the MIA AUC decreases from 0.95 to 0.55, and instance exploitation approaches zero. This suggests that the individual risk does not increase after training, underscoring the significance of proactive defenses in protecting copyrighted data.

Related papers

• CRFU: Compressive Representation Forgetting Against Privacy Leakage on Machine Unlearning [14.061404670832097]
  An effective unlearning method removes the information of the specified data from the trained model, resulting in different outputs for the same input before and after unlearning. We introduce a Compressive Representation Forgetting Unlearning scheme (CRFU) to safeguard against privacy leakage on unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T05:59:02Z)
• Tokens for Learning, Tokens for Unlearning: Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks in Large Language Models via Dual-Purpose Training [13.680205342714412]
  Large language models (LLMs) have become the backbone of modern natural language processing but pose privacy concerns about leaking sensitive training data.<n>We propose methodname, a lightweight yet effective empirical privacy defense for protecting training data of language models by leveraging token-specific characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T03:37:45Z)
• Game-Theoretic Machine Unlearning: Mitigating Extra Privacy Leakage [12.737028324709609]
  Recent legislation obligates organizations to remove requested data and its influence from a trained model. We propose a game-theoretic machine unlearning algorithm that simulates the competitive relationship between unlearning performance and privacy protection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T13:47:04Z)
• Pseudo-Probability Unlearning: Towards Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Machine Unlearning [59.29849532966454]
  We propose PseudoProbability Unlearning (PPU), a novel method that enables models to forget data to adhere to privacy-preserving manner. Our method achieves over 20% improvements in forgetting error compared to the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:27:06Z)
• Detecting, Explaining, and Mitigating Memorization in Diffusion Models [49.438362005962375]
  We introduce a straightforward yet effective method for detecting memorized prompts by inspecting the magnitude of text-conditional predictions. Our proposed method seamlessly integrates without disrupting sampling algorithms, and delivers high accuracy even at the first generation step. Building on our detection strategy, we unveil an explainable approach that shows the contribution of individual words or tokens to memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T16:13:29Z)
• Learning to Refuse: Towards Mitigating Privacy Risks in LLMs [6.685921135304385]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating natural language. This study addresses the challenge of enabling LLMs to protect specific individuals' private data without the need for complete retraining. We introduce the Name-Aware Unlearning Framework (NAUF) for Privacy Protection, which enables the model to learn which individuals' information should be protected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T03:05:53Z)
• IDT: Dual-Task Adversarial Attacks for Privacy Protection [8.312362092693377]
  Methods to protect privacy can involve using representations inside models that are not to detect sensitive attributes. We propose IDT, a method that analyses predictions made by auxiliary and interpretable models to identify which tokens are important to change. We evaluate different datasets for NLP suitable for different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T04:14:35Z)
• Ungeneralizable Examples [70.76487163068109]
  Current approaches to creating unlearnable data involve incorporating small, specially designed noises. We extend the concept of unlearnable data to conditional data learnability and introduce textbfUntextbfGeneralizable textbfExamples (UGEs) UGEs exhibit learnability for authorized users while maintaining unlearnability for potential hackers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T09:29:14Z)
• Robust Federated Learning Mitigates Client-side Training Data Distribution Inference Attacks [48.70867241987739]
  InferGuard is a novel Byzantine-robust aggregation rule aimed at defending against client-side training data distribution inference attacks. The results of our experiments indicate that our defense mechanism is highly effective in protecting against client-side training data distribution inference attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T17:41:35Z)
• OrderBkd: Textual backdoor attack through repositioning [0.0]
  Third-party datasets and pre-trained machine learning models pose a threat to NLP systems. Existing backdoor attacks involve poisoning the data samples such as insertion of tokens or sentence paraphrasing. Our main difference from the previous work is that we use the reposition of a two words in a sentence as a trigger.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T14:53:37Z)
• Diffence: Fencing Membership Privacy With Diffusion Models [14.633898825111828]
  Deep learning models are vulnerable to membership inference attacks (MIAs) We introduce a novel defense framework against MIAs by leveraging generative models. Our defense, called DIFFENCE, works pre inference, which is unlike prior defenses that are either training-time or post-inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T20:45:09Z)
• Setting the Trap: Capturing and Defeating Backdoors in Pretrained Language Models through Honeypots [68.84056762301329]
  Recent research has exposed the susceptibility of pretrained language models (PLMs) to backdoor attacks. We propose and integrate a honeypot module into the original PLM to absorb backdoor information exclusively. Our design is motivated by the observation that lower-layer representations in PLMs carry sufficient backdoor features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T08:21:16Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• The Devil's Advocate: Shattering the Illusion of Unexploitable Data using Diffusion Models [14.018862290487617]
  We show that a carefully designed denoising process can counteract the data-protecting perturbations. Our approach, called AVATAR, delivers state-of-the-art performance against a suite of recent availability attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T10:20:49Z)
• Learning to Unlearn: Instance-wise Unlearning for Pre-trained Classifiers [71.70205894168039]
  We consider instance-wise unlearning, of which the goal is to delete information on a set of instances from a pre-trained model. We propose two methods that reduce forgetting on the remaining data: 1) utilizing adversarial examples to overcome forgetting at the representation-level and 2) leveraging weight importance metrics to pinpoint network parameters guilty of propagating unwanted information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T07:53:50Z)
• Planting and Mitigating Memorized Content in Predictive-Text Language Models [11.911353678499008]
  Language models are widely deployed to provide automatic text completion services in user products. Recent research has revealed that language models bear considerable risk of memorizing private training data. In this study, we test the efficacy of a range of privacy-preserving techniques to mitigate unintended memorization of sensitive user text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T17:57:14Z)
• Unintended Memorization and Timing Attacks in Named Entity Recognition Models [5.404816271595691]
  We study the setting when NER models are available as a black-box service for identifying sensitive information in user documents. With updated pre-trained NER models from spaCy, we demonstrate two distinct membership attacks on these models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-04T03:32:16Z)
• Preventing Verbatim Memorization in Language Models Gives a False Sense of Privacy [91.98116450958331]
  We argue that verbatim memorization definitions are too restrictive and fail to capture more subtle forms of memorization. Specifically, we design and implement an efficient defense that perfectly prevents all verbatim memorization. We conclude by discussing potential alternative definitions and why defining memorization is a difficult yet crucial open question for neural language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T17:57:55Z)
• A Unified Evaluation of Textual Backdoor Learning: Frameworks and Benchmarks [72.7373468905418]
  We develop an open-source toolkit OpenBackdoor to foster the implementations and evaluations of textual backdoor learning. We also propose CUBE, a simple yet strong clustering-based defense baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T02:29:23Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning on Partitioned Attributes [6.661716208346423]
  Federated learning empowers collaborative training without exposing local data or models. We introduce an adversarial learning based procedure which tunes a local model to release privacy-preserving intermediate representations. To alleviate the accuracy decline, we propose a defense method based on the forward-backward splitting algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T14:49:14Z)
• Towards Variable-Length Textual Adversarial Attacks [68.27995111870712]
  It is non-trivial to conduct textual adversarial attacks on natural language processing tasks due to the discreteness of data. In this paper, we propose variable-length textual adversarial attacks(VL-Attack) Our method can achieve $33.18$ BLEU score on IWSLT14 German-English translation, achieving an improvement of $1.47$ over the baseline model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T14:37:27Z)
• Sampling Attacks: Amplification of Membership Inference Attacks by Repeated Queries [74.59376038272661]
  We introduce sampling attack, a novel membership inference technique that unlike other standard membership adversaries is able to work under severe restriction of no access to scores of the victim model. We show that a victim model that only publishes the labels is still susceptible to sampling attacks and the adversary can recover up to 100% of its performance. For defense, we choose differential privacy in the form of gradient perturbation during the training of the victim model as well as output perturbation at prediction time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T12:54:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.