How Well Can Knowledge Edit Methods Edit Perplexing Knowledge?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17253v2
• Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 19:47:29 GMT
• Title: How Well Can Knowledge Edit Methods Edit Perplexing Knowledge?
• Authors: Huaizhi Ge, Frank Rudzicz, Zining Zhu,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, but updating their knowledge post-training remains a critical challenge. We introduce the concept of perplexingness'': the degree to which new knowledge conflicts with an LLM's learned conceptual hierarchies and categorical relationships. Our analysis reveals that edits involving more abstract concepts (hypernyms) generally exhibit higher perplexingness and are more resistant to modification than their specific counterparts (hyponyms)
• Score: 18.022428746019582
• License:
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, but updating their knowledge post-training remains a critical challenge. While recent model editing techniques like Rank-One Model Editing (ROME) show promise, their effectiveness may vary based on the nature of the knowledge being edited. We introduce the concept of ``perplexingness'': the degree to which new knowledge conflicts with an LLM's learned conceptual hierarchies and categorical relationships. For instance, editing ``British Shorthair is a kind of cat'' to ``British Shorthair is a kind of dog'' represents a low-perplexingness edit within the same taxonomic level, while editing ``A cat is a kind of animal'' to ``A cat is a kind of plant'' represents a high-perplexingness edit that violates fundamental categorical boundaries. To systematically investigate this phenomenon, we introduce HierarchyData, a carefully curated dataset of 99 hyponym-hypernym pairs across diverse categories. Through controlled experiments across three models and four editing methods, we demonstrate a strong negative correlation between the perplexingness of new knowledge and the effectiveness of knowledge editing. Our analysis reveals that edits involving more abstract concepts (hypernyms) generally exhibit higher perplexingness and are more resistant to modification than their specific counterparts (hyponyms). These findings highlight a fundamental challenge in LLM knowledge editing: the more a new fact contradicts an LLM's learned conceptual hierarchies, the harder it becomes to reliably encode that knowledge.

Related papers

• AnyEdit: Edit Any Knowledge Encoded in Language Models [69.30638272162267]
  We propose AnyEdit, a new autoregressive editing paradigm for large language models (LLMs) It decomposes long-form knowledge into sequential chunks and iteratively edits the key token in each chunk, ensuring consistent and accurate outputs. It outperforms strong baselines by 21.5% on benchmarks including UnKEBench, AKEW, and our new EditEverything dataset for long-form diverse-formatted knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T16:18:37Z)
• Relation Also Knows: Rethinking the Recall and Editing of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Transformer Language Models [15.698183471185066]
  The storage and recall of factual associations in auto-regressive transformer language models (LMs) have drawn a great deal of attention. Most editing works achieve knowledge editing under the guidance of existing interpretations of knowledge recall that mainly focus on subject knowledge. In this work, we discover a novel relation-focused perspective to interpret the knowledge recall of transformer LMs during inference and apply it on single knowledge editing to avoid over-generalizing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T14:22:02Z)
• Knowledge in Superposition: Unveiling the Failures of Lifelong Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [19.357663224043534]
  Knowledge editing aims to update outdated or incorrect knowledge in large language models. Current knowledge editing methods have limited scalability for lifelong editing. This study explores the fundamental reason why knowledge editing fails in lifelong editing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T09:43:32Z)
• WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models [78.22291694903659]
  Large language models (LLMs) need knowledge updates to meet the ever-growing world facts and correct the hallucinated responses. Where the updated knowledge resides in memories is a fundamental question for model editing. We propose WISE to bridge the gap between memories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T16:35:52Z)
• TAXI: Evaluating Categorical Knowledge Editing for Language Models [13.889284093852687]
  Knowledge editing aims to inject new facts into language models to improve their factuality. Current benchmarks fail to evaluate consistency, which is critical to ensure efficient, accurate, and generalizable edits. We manually create TAXI, a new benchmark dataset specifically created to evaluate consistency in categorical knowledge edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T13:09:11Z)
• Editing Conceptual Knowledge for Large Language Models [65.38231526537476]
  This paper pioneers the investigation of editing conceptual knowledge for Large Language Models (LLMs) We construct a novel benchmark dataset ConceptEdit and establish a suite of new metrics for evaluation. experimental results reveal that, although existing editing methods can efficiently modify concept-level definition to some extent, they also have the potential to distort the related instantial knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T16:57:10Z)
• Editing Factual Knowledge and Explanatory Ability of Medical Large Language Models [89.13883089162951]
  Model editing aims to precisely alter the behaviors of large language models (LLMs) in relation to specific knowledge. This approach has proven effective in addressing issues of hallucination and outdated information in LLMs. However, the potential of using model editing to modify knowledge in the medical field remains largely unexplored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T06:40:57Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z)
• Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowledge [72.63368052592004]
  We study LMs' abilities to make inferences based on injected facts (or propagate those facts) We find that existing methods for updating knowledge show little propagation of injected knowledge. Yet, prepending entity definitions in an LM's context improves performance across all settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T17:59:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.