STBench: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models in Spatio-Temporal Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19065v1
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:34:02 GMT
- Title: STBench: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models in Spatio-Temporal Analysis
- Authors: Wenbin Li, Di Yao, Ruibo Zhao, Wenjie Chen, Zijie Xu, Chengxue Luo, Chang Gong, Quanliang Jing, Haining Tan, Jingping Bi,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) hold promise for reforming the methodology of rapid rapid evolution of large language models.
This paper builds the benchmark dataset STBench, containing 13 distinct computation tasks and over 60,000 QA pairs.
Experimental results reveal that existing LLMs show remarkable performance on knowledge comprehension and distinct-temporal reasoning tasks.
- Score: 12.582867572800488
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The rapid evolution of large language models (LLMs) holds promise for reforming the methodology of spatio-temporal data mining. However, current works for evaluating the spatio-temporal understanding capability of LLMs are somewhat limited and biased. These works either fail to incorporate the latest language models or only focus on assessing the memorized spatio-temporal knowledge. To address this gap, this paper dissects LLMs' capability of spatio-temporal data into four distinct dimensions: knowledge comprehension, spatio-temporal reasoning, accurate computation, and downstream applications. We curate several natural language question-answer tasks for each category and build the benchmark dataset, namely STBench, containing 13 distinct tasks and over 60,000 QA pairs. Moreover, we have assessed the capabilities of 13 LLMs, such as GPT-4o, Gemma and Mistral. Experimental results reveal that existing LLMs show remarkable performance on knowledge comprehension and spatio-temporal reasoning tasks, with potential for further enhancement on other tasks through in-context learning, chain-of-though prompting, and fine-tuning. The code and datasets of STBench are released on https://github.com/LwbXc/STBench.
Related papers
- ChronoSense: Exploring Temporal Understanding in Large Language Models with Time Intervals of Events [0.20132569095596248]
We present ChronoSense, a new benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' temporal understanding.
We assess the performance of seven recent LLMs using this benchmark and the results indicate that models handle Allen relations, even symmetrical ones, quite differently.
Overall, the models' low performance highlights the need for improved temporal understanding in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-06T14:27:41Z) - Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information [87.3175915185287]
"Context is Key" (CiK) is a forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context.
We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters.
We propose a simple yet effective LLM prompting method that outperforms all other tested methods on our benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T17:56:08Z) - Living in the Moment: Can Large Language Models Grasp Co-Temporal Reasoning? [70.19200858203388]
Temporal reasoning is fundamental for large language models to comprehend the world.
CoTempQA is a benchmark containing four co-temporal scenarios.
Our experiments reveal a significant gap between the performance of current LLMs and human-level reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T12:56:21Z) - FAC$^2$E: Better Understanding Large Language Model Capabilities by Dissociating Language and Cognition [56.76951887823882]
Large language models (LLMs) are primarily evaluated by overall performance on various text understanding and generation tasks.
We present FAC$2$E, a framework for Fine-grAined and Cognition-grounded LLMs' Capability Evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T21:05:37Z) - Linguistic Intelligence in Large Language Models for Telecommunications [5.06945923921948]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a significant advancement in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP)
This study seeks to evaluate the knowledge and understanding capabilities of LLMs within the telecommunications domain.
Our evaluation reveals that zero-shot LLMs can achieve performance levels comparable to the current state-of-the-art fine-tuned models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-24T14:01:07Z) - Temporal Blind Spots in Large Language Models [20.631107338678234]
Large language models (LLMs) have recently gained significant attention due to their unparalleled ability to perform various natural language processing tasks.
This study investigates the underlying limitations of general-purpose LLMs when deployed for tasks that require a temporal understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T16:20:14Z) - LLaMA Beyond English: An Empirical Study on Language Capability Transfer [49.298360366468934]
We focus on how to effectively transfer the capabilities of language generation and following instructions to a non-English language.
We analyze the impact of key factors such as vocabulary extension, further pretraining, and instruction tuning on transfer.
We employ four widely used standardized testing benchmarks: C-Eval, MMLU, AGI-Eval, and GAOKAO-Bench.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-02T06:29:02Z) - Towards Robust Temporal Reasoning of Large Language Models via a Multi-Hop QA Dataset and Pseudo-Instruction Tuning [73.51314109184197]
It is crucial for large language models (LLMs) to understand the concept of temporal knowledge.
We propose a complex temporal question-answering dataset Complex-TR that focuses on multi-answer and multi-hop temporal reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T11:49:29Z) - MenatQA: A New Dataset for Testing the Temporal Comprehension and
Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models [17.322480769274062]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown nearly saturated performance on many natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
This paper constructs Multiple Sensitive Factors Time QA (MenatQA) with total 2,853 samples for evaluating the time comprehension and reasoning abilities of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-08T13:19:52Z) - Self-Checker: Plug-and-Play Modules for Fact-Checking with Large Language Models [75.75038268227554]
Self-Checker is a framework comprising a set of plug-and-play modules that facilitate fact-checking.
This framework provides a fast and efficient way to construct fact-checking systems in low-resource environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T01:46:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.