A Closer Look at Deep Learning Methods on Tabular Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.00956v3
• Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:19:30 GMT
• Title: A Closer Look at Deep Learning Methods on Tabular Datasets
• Authors: Han-Jia Ye, Si-Yang Liu, Hao-Run Cai, Qi-Le Zhou, De-Chuan Zhan,
• Abstract summary: Tabular data is prevalent across diverse domains in machine learning. Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based methods have recently demonstrated promising performance. We compare 32 state-of-the-art deep and tree-based methods, evaluating their average performance across multiple criteria.
• Score: 52.50778536274327
• License:
• Abstract: Tabular data is prevalent across diverse domains in machine learning. While classical methods like tree-based models have long been effective, Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based methods have recently demonstrated promising performance. However, the diverse characteristics of methods and the inherent heterogeneity of tabular datasets make understanding and interpreting tabular methods both challenging and prone to unstable observations. In this paper, we conduct in-depth evaluations and comprehensive analyses of tabular methods, with a particular focus on DNN-based models, using a benchmark of over 300 tabular datasets spanning a wide range of task types, sizes, and domains. First, we perform an extensive comparison of 32 state-of-the-art deep and tree-based methods, evaluating their average performance across multiple criteria. Although method ranks vary across datasets, we empirically find that top-performing methods tend to concentrate within a small subset of tabular models, regardless of the criteria used. Next, we investigate whether the training dynamics of deep tabular models can be predicted based on dataset properties. This approach not only offers insights into the behavior of deep tabular methods but also identifies a core set of "meta-features" that reflect dataset heterogeneity. The other subset includes datasets where method ranks are consistent with the overall benchmark, acting as a reliable probe for further tabular analysis.

Related papers

• Modern Neighborhood Components Analysis: A Deep Tabular Baseline Two Decades Later [59.88557193062348]
  We revisit the classic Neighborhood Component Analysis (NCA), designed to learn a linear projection that captures semantic similarities between instances. We find that minor modifications, such as adjustments to the learning objectives and the integration of deep learning architectures, significantly enhance NCA's performance. We also introduce a neighbor sampling strategy that improves both the efficiency and predictive accuracy of our proposed ModernNCA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T16:38:57Z)
• Is Deep Learning finally better than Decision Trees on Tabular Data? [19.657605376506357]
  Tabular data is a ubiquitous data modality due to its versatility and ease of use in many real-world applications. Recent studies on data offer a unique perspective on the limitations of neural networks in this domain. Our study categorizes ten state-of-the-art models based on their underlying learning paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T12:59:02Z)
• Minimally Supervised Learning using Topological Projections in Self-Organizing Maps [55.31182147885694]
  We introduce a semi-supervised learning approach based on topological projections in self-organizing maps (SOMs) Our proposed method first trains SOMs on unlabeled data and then a minimal number of available labeled data points are assigned to key best matching units (BMU) Our results indicate that the proposed minimally supervised model significantly outperforms traditional regression techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T22:51:48Z)
• Topological Quality of Subsets via Persistence Matching Diagrams [0.196629787330046]
  We measure the quality of a subset concerning the dataset it represents using topological data analysis techniques. In particular, this approach enables us to explain why the chosen subset is likely to result in poor performance of a supervised learning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T17:08:41Z)
• A Coreset Learning Reality Check [33.002265576337486]
  Subsampling algorithms are a natural approach to reduce data size before fitting models on massive datasets. In recent years, several works have proposed methods for subsampling rows from a data matrix while maintaining relevant information for classification. We compare multiple methods for logistic regression drawn from the coreset and optimal subsampling literature and discover inconsistencies in their effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-15T19:26:17Z)
• TabLLM: Few-shot Classification of Tabular Data with Large Language Models [66.03023402174138]
  We study the application of large language models to zero-shot and few-shot classification. We evaluate several serialization methods including templates, table-to-text models, and large language models. This approach is also competitive with strong traditional baselines like gradient-boosted trees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T17:08:13Z)
• Is margin all you need? An extensive empirical study of active learning on tabular data [66.18464006872345]
  We analyze the performance of a variety of active learning algorithms on 69 real-world datasets from the OpenML-CC18 benchmark. Surprisingly, we find that the classical margin sampling technique matches or outperforms all others, including current state-of-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T21:18:24Z)
• Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data? [0.0]
  We show that tree-based models remain state-of-the-art on medium-sized data. We conduct an empirical investigation into the differing inductive biases of tree-based models and Neural Networks (NNs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T08:36:08Z)
• Statistical embedding: Beyond principal components [0.0]
  Three methods are presented: $t$-SNE, UMAP and LargeVis based on methods in parts one, two and three, respectively. The methods are illustrated and compared on two simulated data sets; one consisting of a triple of noisy Ranunculoid curves, and one consisting of networks of increasing complexity and with two types of nodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T14:01:21Z)
• Evaluating the Disentanglement of Deep Generative Models through Manifold Topology [66.06153115971732]
  We present a method for quantifying disentanglement that only uses the generative model. We empirically evaluate several state-of-the-art models across multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T20:54:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.