POST: Email Archival, Processing and Flagging Stack for Incident Responders

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01433v1
• Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 16:23:45 GMT
• Title: POST: Email Archival, Processing and Flagging Stack for Incident Responders
• Authors: Jeffrey Fairbanks,
• Abstract summary: Phishing is one of the main points of compromise, with email security and awareness being estimated at $50-100B in 2022. Post is an API driven serverless email archival, processing, and flagging workflow for both large and small organizations. It allows full email searching on every aspect of an email, and provides a cost savings of up to 68.6%.
• Score: 0.9790236766474201
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Phishing is one of the main points of compromise, with email security and awareness being estimated at \$50-100B in 2022. There is great need for email forensics capability to quickly search for malicious content. A novel solution POST is proposed. POST is an API driven serverless email archival, processing, and flagging workflow for both large and small organizations that collects and parses all email, flags emails using state of the art Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning, allows full email searching on every aspect of an email, and provides a cost savings of up to 68.6%.

Related papers

• Exploring Content Concealment in Email [0.48748194765816943]
  Modern email filters, one of our few defence mechanisms against malicious emails, are often circumvented by sophisticated attackers. This study focuses on how attackers exploit HTML and CSS in emails to conceal arbitrary content. This concealed content remains undetected by the recipient, presenting a serious security risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T01:12:47Z)
• Prompted Contextual Vectors for Spear-Phishing Detection [45.07804966535239]
  Spear-phishing attacks present a significant security challenge. We propose a detection approach based on a novel document vectorization method. Our method achieves a 91% F1 score in identifying LLM-generated spear-phishing emails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T09:12:55Z)
• Anomaly Detection in Emails using Machine Learning and Header Information [0.0]
  Anomalies in emails such as phishing and spam present major security risks. Previous studies on email anomaly detection relied on a single type of anomaly and the analysis of the email body and subject content. This study conducted feature extraction and selection on email header datasets and leveraged both multi and one-class anomaly detection approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T23:31:23Z)
• One-shot Key Information Extraction from Document with Deep Partial Graph Matching [60.48651298832829]
  Key Information Extraction (KIE) from documents improves efficiency, productivity, and security in many industrial scenarios. Existing supervised learning methods for the KIE task need to feed a large number of labeled samples and learn separate models for different types of documents. We propose a deep end-to-end trainable network for one-shot KIE using partial graph matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-26T07:45:53Z)
• Falling for Phishing: An Empirical Investigation into People's Email Response Behaviors [10.841507821036458]
  Despite sophisticated phishing email detection systems, humans continue to be tricked by phishing emails. We have carried out an empirical study to investigate people's thought processes when reading their emails. We identify eleven factors that influence people's response decisions to both phishing and legitimate emails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-10T16:19:01Z)
• EmailSum: Abstractive Email Thread Summarization [105.46012304024312]
  We develop an abstractive Email Thread Summarization (EmailSum) dataset. This dataset contains human-annotated short (30 words) and long (100 words) summaries of 2549 email threads. Our results reveal the key challenges of current abstractive summarization models in this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T15:13:14Z)
• Phishing Detection through Email Embeddings [2.099922236065961]
  The problem of detecting phishing emails through machine learning techniques has been discussed extensively in the literature. In this paper, we crafted a set of phishing and legitimate emails with similar indicators in order to investigate whether these cues are captured or disregarded by email embeddings. Our results show that using these indicators, email embeddings techniques is effective for classifying emails as phishing or legitimate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T21:16:41Z)
• Robust and Verifiable Information Embedding Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Error-Correcting Codes [81.85509264573948]
  In the era of deep learning, a user often leverages a third-party machine learning tool to train a deep neural network (DNN) classifier. In an information embedding attack, an attacker is the provider of a malicious third-party machine learning tool. In this work, we aim to design information embedding attacks that are verifiable and robust against popular post-processing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T17:42:42Z)
• Scaling Systematic Literature Reviews with Machine Learning Pipelines [57.82662094602138]
  Systematic reviews entail the extraction of data from scientific documents. We construct a pipeline that automates each of these aspects, and experiment with many human-time vs. system quality trade-offs. We find that we can get surprising accuracy and generalisability of the whole pipeline system with only 2 weeks of human-expert annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T16:19:42Z)
• Learning with Weak Supervision for Email Intent Detection [56.71599262462638]
  We propose to leverage user actions as a source of weak supervision to detect intents in emails. We develop an end-to-end robust deep neural network model for email intent identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T23:41:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.