Learning to Reduce: Towards Improving Performance of Large Language Models on Structured Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02750v1
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 01:51:50 GMT
- Title: Learning to Reduce: Towards Improving Performance of Large Language Models on Structured Data
- Authors: Younghun Lee, Sungchul Kim, Ryan A. Rossi, Tong Yu, Xiang Chen,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have been achieving competent performance on a wide range of downstream tasks.
This paper proposes a framework, Learning to Reduce, that fine-tunes a language model with On-Policy Learning to generate a reduced version of an input structured data.
- Score: 39.29778853025738
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have been achieving competent performance on a wide range of downstream tasks, yet existing work shows that inference on structured data is challenging for LLMs. This is because LLMs need to either understand long structured data or select the most relevant evidence before inference, and both approaches are not trivial. This paper proposes a framework, Learning to Reduce, that fine-tunes a language model with On-Policy Learning to generate a reduced version of an input structured data. When compared to state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4, Learning to Reduce not only achieves outstanding performance in reducing the input, but shows generalizability on different datasets. We further show that the model fine-tuned with our framework helps LLMs better perform on table QA tasks especially when the context is longer.
Related papers
- SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts.
We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM.
We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z) - Learning to Plan for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models from Knowledge Graphs [59.76268575344119]
We introduce a novel framework for enhancing large language models' (LLMs) planning capabilities by using planning data derived from knowledge graphs (KGs)
LLMs fine-tuned with KG data have improved planning capabilities, better equipping them to handle complex QA tasks that involve retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T13:07:38Z) - Small Language Model Is a Good Guide for Large Language Model in Chinese
Entity Relation Extraction [13.344709924683471]
In this paper, we propose SLCoLM, a model collaboration framework, to mitigate the data long-tail problem.
We use the textitTraining-Guide-Predict'' strategy to combine the strengths of pre-trained language models (PLMs) and large language models (LLMs)
Our experiments on a RE dataset rich in relation types show that the approach in this paper facilitates RE of long-tail relation types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T08:26:56Z) - Learning to Reduce: Optimal Representations of Structured Data in
Prompting Large Language Models [42.16047343029512]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely used as general-purpose AI agents.
We propose a framework, Learning to Reduce, that fine-tunes a language model to generate a reduced version of an input context.
We show that our model achieves comparable accuracies in selecting the relevant evidence from an input context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T00:41:23Z) - Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering.
The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored.
We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z) - LLM-augmented Preference Learning from Natural Language [19.700169351688768]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped to deal with larger context lengths.
LLMs can consistently outperform the SotA when the target text is large.
Few-shot learning yields better performance than zero-shot learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T17:17:27Z) - Small Language Models Improve Giants by Rewriting Their Outputs [18.025736098795296]
We tackle the problem of leveraging training data to improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) without fine-tuning.
We create a pool of candidates from the LLM through few-shot prompting and we employ a compact model, the LM-corrector (LMCor), specifically trained to merge these candidates to produce an enhanced output.
Experiments on four natural language generation tasks demonstrate that even a small LMCor model (250M) substantially improves the few-shot performance of LLMs (62B), matching and even outperforming standard fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T22:07:50Z) - LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models [65.02607075556742]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in language understanding and generation.
We tackle the compression of LLMs within the bound of two constraints: being task-agnostic and minimizing the reliance on the original training dataset.
Our method, named LLM-Pruner, adopts structural pruning that selectively removes non-critical coupled structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T12:10:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.