TheoremLlama: Transforming General-Purpose LLMs into Lean4 Experts
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03203v1
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:36:18 GMT
- Title: TheoremLlama: Transforming General-Purpose LLMs into Lean4 Experts
- Authors: Ruida Wang, Jipeng Zhang, Yizhen Jia, Rui Pan, Shizhe Diao, Renjie Pi, Tong Zhang,
- Abstract summary: Proving mathematical theorems using computer-verifiable formal languages like Lean significantly impacts mathematical reasoning.
One approach to formal theorem proving involves generating complete proofs using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on Natural Language (NL) proofs.
This paper proposes **Theorelama**, an end-to-end framework to train a general-purpose LLM to become a Lean4 expert.
- Score: 26.98890165420689
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Proving mathematical theorems using computer-verifiable formal languages like Lean significantly impacts mathematical reasoning. One approach to formal theorem proving involves generating complete proofs using Large Language Models (LLMs) based on Natural Language (NL) proofs. Similar methods have shown promising results in code generation. However, most modern LLMs exhibit suboptimal performance due to the scarcity of aligned NL and Formal Language (FL) theorem-proving data. This scarcity results in a paucity of methodologies for training LLMs and techniques to fully utilize their capabilities in composing formal proofs. To address the challenges, this paper proposes **TheoremLlama**, an end-to-end framework to train a general-purpose LLM to become a Lean4 expert. This framework encompasses NL-FL aligned dataset generation methods, training approaches for the LLM formal theorem prover, and techniques for LLM Lean4 proof writing. Using the dataset generation method, we provide *Open Bootstrapped Theorems* (OBT), an NL-FL aligned and bootstrapped dataset. A key innovation in this framework is the NL-FL bootstrapping method, where NL proofs are integrated into Lean4 code for training datasets, leveraging the NL reasoning ability of LLMs for formal reasoning. The **TheoremLlama** framework achieves cumulative accuracies of 36.48% and 33.61% on MiniF2F-Valid and Test datasets respectively, surpassing the GPT-4 baseline of 22.95% and 25.41%. We have also open-sourced our model checkpoints and generated dataset, and will soon make all the code publicly available.
Related papers
- Applying RLAIF for Code Generation with API-usage in Lightweight LLMs [15.366324461797582]
Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF) has demonstrated significant potential across various domains.
This paper introduces an RLAIF framework for improving the code generation abilities of lightweight (1B parameters) LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T17:16:03Z) - DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Data [65.5290035371111]
We introduce an approach to generate extensive Lean 4 proof data derived from high-school and undergraduate-level mathematical competition problems.
We fine-tune the DeepSeekMath 7B model on this synthetic dataset, which comprises 8 million formal statements with proofs.
Our model successfully proved 5 out of 148 problems in the Lean 4 Formalized International Mathematical Olympiad (FIMO) benchmark, while GPT-4 failed to prove any.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T09:03:42Z) - Towards Large Language Models as Copilots for Theorem Proving in Lean [81.94024084598598]
We introduce Lean Copilot, a framework for running Lean inference in large language models.
We build tools for suggesting proof steps, completing intermediate proof goals, and selecting relevant premises.
Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in assisting humans and theorem proving process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T22:54:08Z) - MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents [62.02920842630234]
We show how to build small models that have GPT-4-level performance but for 400x lower cost.
We unify pre-existing datasets into a benchmark LLM-AggreFact.
Our best system MiniCheck-FT5 (770M parameters) outperforms all systems of comparable size and reaches GPT-4 accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T17:59:10Z) - $\forall$uto$\exists$val: Autonomous Assessment of LLMs in Formal Synthesis and Interpretation Tasks [21.12437562185667]
This paper presents a new approach for scaling LLM assessment in translating formal syntax to natural language.
We use context-free grammars (CFGs) to generate out-of-distribution datasets on the fly.
We also conduct an assessment of several SOTA closed and open-source LLMs to showcase the feasibility and scalability of this paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-27T08:08:00Z) - Evaluation of LLMs on Syntax-Aware Code Fill-in-the-Middle Tasks [12.629516072317331]
Syntax-Aware Fill-In-the-Middle (SAFIM) is a new benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on the code Fill-in-the-Middle (FIM) task.
This benchmark focuses on syntax-aware completions of program structures such as code blocks and conditional expressions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T05:05:56Z) - Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering.
The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored.
We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z) - Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Model Knowledge [78.38870272050106]
Large language models (LLMs) have been treated as knowledge bases due to their strong performance in knowledge probing tasks.
How do we evaluate the capabilities of LLMs to consistently produce factually correct answers?
We propose MOdel kNowledge relIabiliTy scORe (MONITOR), a novel metric designed to directly measure LLMs' factual reliability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-15T12:40:30Z) - LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Models [72.54339382005732]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in proving formal theorems using proof assistants such as Lean.
Existing methods are difficult to reproduce or build on, due to private code, data, and compute requirements.
This paper introduces LeanDojo: an open-source Lean toolkit consisting of toolkits, data, models.
We develop ReProver: an LLM-based prover augmented with retrieval for selecting premises from a vast math library.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-27T17:05:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.