Drop it All or Pick it Up? How Developers Responded to the Log4JShell Vulnerability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.04263v1
• Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 05:33:10 GMT
• Title: Drop it All or Pick it Up? How Developers Responded to the Log4JShell Vulnerability
• Authors: Vittunyuta Maeprasart, Ali Ouni, Raula Gaikovina Kula,
• Abstract summary: We explore the prolific and possibly one of the cases of the Log4JShell, a vulnerability that has the highest severity rating ever. Our study confirms that developers show a quick response taking from 5 to 6 days. Instead of dropping everything, surprisingly developer activities tend to increase for all pending issues and PRs.
• Score: 5.164262886682181
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Although using third-party libraries has become prevalent in contemporary software development, developers often struggle to update their dependencies. Prior works acknowledge that due to the migration effort, priority and other issues cause lags in the migration process. The common assumption is that developers should drop all other activities and prioritize fixing the vulnerability. Our objective is to understand developer behavior when facing high-risk vulnerabilities in their code. We explore the prolific, and possibly one of the cases of the Log4JShell, a vulnerability that has the highest severity rating ever, which received widespread media attention. Using a mixed-method approach, we analyze 219 GitHub Pull Requests (PR) and 354 issues belonging to 53 Maven projects affected by the Log4JShell vulnerability. Our study confirms that developers show a quick response taking from 5 to 6 days. However, instead of dropping everything, surprisingly developer activities tend to increase for all pending issues and PRs. Developer discussions involved either giving information (29.3\%) and seeking information (20.6\%), which is missing in existing support tools. Leveraging this possibly-one of a kind event, insights opens up a new line of research, causing us to rethink best practices and what developers need in order to efficiently fix vulnerabilities.

Related papers

• RedCode: Risky Code Execution and Generation Benchmark for Code Agents [50.81206098588923]
  RedCode is a benchmark for risky code execution and generation. RedCode-Exec provides challenging prompts that could lead to risky code execution. RedCode-Gen provides 160 prompts with function signatures and docstrings as input to assess whether code agents will follow instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:30:06Z)
• Discovery of Timeline and Crowd Reaction of Software Vulnerability Disclosures [47.435076500269545]
  Apache Log4J was found to be vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. More than 35,000 packages were forced to update their Log4J libraries with the latest version. It is practically reasonable for software developers to update their third-party libraries whenever the software vendors have released a vulnerable-free version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T01:55:51Z)
• Understanding Code Understandability Improvements in Code Reviews [79.16476505761582]
  We analyzed 2,401 code review comments from Java open-source projects on GitHub. 83.9% of suggestions for improvement were accepted and integrated, with fewer than 1% later reverted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T12:21:23Z)
• Seeker: Enhancing Exception Handling in Code with LLM-based Multi-Agent Approach [54.03528377384397]
  In real world software development, improper or missing exception handling can severely impact the robustness and reliability of code. We explore the use of large language models (LLMs) to improve exception handling in code. We propose Seeker, a multi agent framework inspired by expert developer strategies for exception handling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T14:45:45Z)
• Unintentional Security Flaws in Code: Automated Defense via Root Cause Analysis [2.899501205987888]
  We developed an automated vulnerability root cause (RC) toolkit called T5-RCGCN. It combines T5 language model embeddings with a graph convolutional network (GCN) for vulnerability classification and localization. We tested T5-RCGCN with 56 junior developers across three datasets, showing a 28.9% improvement in code security compared to previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T18:26:59Z)
• WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Models [66.34505141027624]
  We introduce WildTeaming, an automatic LLM safety red-teaming framework that mines in-the-wild user-chatbot interactions to discover 5.7K unique clusters of novel jailbreak tactics. WildTeaming reveals previously unidentified vulnerabilities of frontier LLMs, resulting in up to 4.6x more diverse and successful adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T17:31:22Z)
• How well does LLM generate security tests? [8.454827764115631]
  Developers often build software on top of third-party libraries (Libs) to improve productivity and software quality. People refer to such attacks as supply chain attacks, the documented number of which has increased 742% in 2022. We used ChatGPT-4.0 to generate security tests, and to demonstrate how vulnerable library dependencies facilitate the supply chain attacks to given Apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T16:00:58Z)
• Using Developer Discussions to Guide Fixing Bugs in Software [51.00904399653609]
  We propose using bug report discussions, which are available before the task is performed and are also naturally occurring, avoiding the need for additional information from developers. We demonstrate that various forms of natural language context derived from such discussions can aid bug-fixing, even leading to improved performance over using commit messages corresponding to the oracle bug-fixing commits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T16:37:33Z)
• Early Detection of Security-Relevant Bug Reports using Machine Learning: How Far Are We? [6.438136820117887]
  In a typical maintenance scenario, security-relevant bug reports are prioritised by the development team when preparing corrective patches. Open security-relevant bug reports can become a critical leak of sensitive information that attackers can leverage to perform zero-day attacks. In recent years, approaches for the detection of security-relevant bug reports based on machine learning have been reported with promising performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-19T11:30:29Z)
• Automated Mapping of Vulnerability Advisories onto their Fix Commits in Open Source Repositories [7.629717457706326]
  We present an approach that combines practical experience and machine-learning (ML) An advisory record containing key information about a vulnerability is extracted from an advisory. A subset of candidate fix commits is obtained from the source code repository of the affected project.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T17:50:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.