VideoEval: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Low-Cost Evaluation of Video Foundation Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06491v1
• Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 01:49:08 GMT
• Title: VideoEval: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Low-Cost Evaluation of Video Foundation Model
• Authors: Xinhao Li, Zhenpeng Huang, Jing Wang, Kunchang Li, Limin Wang,
• Abstract summary: Video Foundation Models (VFMs) have made significant progress recently. Existing benchmarks and evaluation protocols are often limited by relatively poor diversity, high evaluation costs, and saturated performance metrics. We build a comprehensive benchmark suite to address these issues, namely VideoEval.
• Score: 22.188795668927586
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the growth of high-quality data and advancement in visual pre-training paradigms, Video Foundation Models (VFMs) have made significant progress recently, demonstrating their remarkable performance on traditional video understanding benchmarks. However, the existing benchmarks (e.g. Kinetics) and their evaluation protocols are often limited by relatively poor diversity, high evaluation costs, and saturated performance metrics. In this paper, we build a comprehensive benchmark suite to address these issues, namely VideoEval. Specifically, we establish the Video Task Adaption Benchmark (VidTAB) and the Video Embedding Benchmark (VidEB) from two perspectives: evaluating the task adaptability of VFMs under few-shot conditions and assessing their representation power by directly applying to downstream tasks. With VideoEval, we conduct a large-scale study on 20 popular open-source vision foundation models. Our study reveals some insightful findings on VFMs: 1) overall, current VFMs exhibit weak generalization across diverse tasks, 2) increasing video data, whether labeled or weakly-labeled video-text pairs, does not necessarily improve task performance, 3) the effectiveness of some pre-training paradigms may not be fully validated in previous benchmarks, and 4) combining different pre-training paradigms can help improve the generalization capabilities. We believe this study serves as an important complement to the current evaluation for VFMs and offers valuable insights for the future research.

Related papers

• VQA$^2$: Visual Question Answering for Video Quality Assessment [76.81110038738699]
  Video Quality Assessment (VQA) is a classic field in low-level visual perception. Recent studies in the image domain have demonstrated that Visual Question Answering (VQA) can enhance markedly low-level visual quality evaluation. We introduce the VQA2 Instruction dataset - the first visual question answering instruction dataset that focuses on video quality assessment. The VQA2 series models interleave visual and motion tokens to enhance the perception of spatial-temporal quality details in videos.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T09:39:52Z)
• AutoBench-V: Can Large Vision-Language Models Benchmark Themselves? [55.14033256706175]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become essential for advancing the integration of visual and linguistic information. We introduce AutoBench-V, an automated framework for serving evaluation on demand. Through an extensive evaluation of seven popular LVLMs across five demanded user inputs, the framework shows effectiveness and reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T17:55:08Z)
• VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models [75.88987277686914]
  We present the Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models (VHELM) VHELM aggregates various datasets to cover one or more of the 9 aspects: visual perception, knowledge, reasoning, bias, fairness, multilinguality, robustness, toxicity, and safety. Our framework is designed to be lightweight and automatic so that evaluation runs are cheap and fast.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:46:34Z)
• E.T. Bench: Towards Open-Ended Event-Level Video-Language Understanding [57.630136434038384]
  We introduce E.T. Bench (Event-Level & Time-Sensitive Video Understanding Benchmark), a large-scale benchmark for open-ended event-level video understanding. We extensively evaluated 8 Image-LLMs and 12 Video-LLMs on our benchmark, and the results reveal that state-of-the-art models for coarse-level (video-level) understanding struggle to solve our fine-grained tasks. Our simple but effective solution demonstrates superior performance in multiple scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T17:53:04Z)
• MMBench-Video: A Long-Form Multi-Shot Benchmark for Holistic Video Understanding [67.56182262082729]
  We introduce MMBench-Video, a quantitative benchmark to rigorously evaluate large vision-language models (LVLMs) in video understanding. MMBench-Video incorporates lengthy videos from YouTube and employs free-form questions, mirroring practical use cases. The benchmark is meticulously crafted to probe the models' temporal reasoning skills, with all questions human-annotated according to a carefully constructed ability taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:26:01Z)
• Foundation Models for Video Understanding: A Survey [26.52064059342181]
  Video Foundation Models (ViFMs) aim to learn a general-purpose representation for various video understanding tasks. This survey analyzes over 200 video foundational models, offering a comprehensive overview of benchmarks and evaluation metrics across 14 distinct video tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T18:09:48Z)
• ViLMA: A Zero-Shot Benchmark for Linguistic and Temporal Grounding in Video-Language Models [28.305932427801682]
  We present ViLMA (Video Language Model Assessment), a task-agnostic benchmark that places the assessment of fine-grained capabilities of VidLMs on a firm footing. ViLMA offers a controlled evaluation suite that sheds light on the true potential of these models, as well as their performance gaps compared to human-level understanding. We show that current VidLMs' grounding abilities are no better than those of vision-language models which use static images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T02:13:13Z)
• VideoGLUE: Video General Understanding Evaluation of Foundation Models [89.07145427268948]
  We evaluate video understanding capabilities of foundation models (FMs) using a carefully designed experiment protocol. We jointly profile FMs' hallmark and efficacy efficiency when adapting to general video understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T17:47:52Z)
• Unsupervised Video Summarization via Multi-source Features [4.387757291346397]
  Video summarization aims at generating a compact yet representative visual summary that conveys the essence of the original video. We propose the incorporation of multiple feature sources with chunk and stride fusion to provide more information about the visual content. For a comprehensive evaluation on the two benchmarks TVSum and SumMe, we compare our method with four state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-26T13:12:46Z)
• Realistic Video Summarization through VISIOCITY: A New Benchmark and Evaluation Framework [15.656965429236235]
  We take steps towards making automatic video summarization more realistic by addressing several challenges. Firstly, the currently available datasets either have very short videos or have few long videos of only a particular type. We introduce a new benchmarking dataset VISIOCITY which comprises of longer videos across six different categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T02:44:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.