Explaining Graph Neural Networks for Node Similarity on Graphs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07639v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:20:47 GMT
• Title: Explaining Graph Neural Networks for Node Similarity on Graphs
• Authors: Daniel Daza, Cuong Xuan Chu, Trung-Kien Tran, Daria Stepanova, Michael Cochez, Paul Groth,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how GNN-based methods for computing node similarities can be augmented with explanations. Specifically, we evaluate the performance of two approaches towards explanations in GNNs. We find that unlike MI explanations, gradient-based explanations have three desirable properties.
• Score: 9.14795454299225
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Similarity search is a fundamental task for exploiting information in various applications dealing with graph data, such as citation networks or knowledge graphs. While this task has been intensively approached from heuristics to graph embeddings and graph neural networks (GNNs), providing explanations for similarity has received less attention. In this work we are concerned with explainable similarity search over graphs, by investigating how GNN-based methods for computing node similarities can be augmented with explanations. Specifically, we evaluate the performance of two prominent approaches towards explanations in GNNs, based on the concepts of mutual information (MI), and gradient-based explanations (GB). We discuss their suitability and empirically validate the properties of their explanations over different popular graph benchmarks. We find that unlike MI explanations, gradient-based explanations have three desirable properties. First, they are actionable: selecting inputs depending on them results in predictable changes in similarity scores. Second, they are consistent: the effect of selecting certain inputs overlaps very little with the effect of discarding them. Third, they can be pruned significantly to obtain sparse explanations that retain the effect on similarity scores.

Related papers

• View-based Explanations for Graph Neural Networks [27.19300566616961]
  We propose GVEX, a novel paradigm that generates Graph Views for EXplanation. We show that this strategy provides an approximation ratio of 1/2. Our second algorithm performs a single-pass to an input node stream in batches to incrementally maintain explanation views.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T06:20:24Z)
• Rethinking Explaining Graph Neural Networks via Non-parametric Subgraph Matching [68.35685422301613]
  We propose a novel non-parametric subgraph matching framework, dubbed MatchExplainer, to explore explanatory subgraphs. It couples the target graph with other counterpart instances and identifies the most crucial joint substructure by minimizing the node corresponding-based distance. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show the effectiveness of our MatchExplainer by outperforming all state-of-the-art parametric baselines with significant margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-07T05:14:45Z)
• CGMN: A Contrastive Graph Matching Network for Self-Supervised Graph Similarity Learning [65.1042892570989]
  We propose a contrastive graph matching network (CGMN) for self-supervised graph similarity learning. We employ two strategies, namely cross-view interaction and cross-graph interaction, for effective node representation learning. We transform node representations into graph-level representations via pooling operations for graph similarity computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T13:20:26Z)
• Reinforced Causal Explainer for Graph Neural Networks [112.57265240212001]
  Explainability is crucial for probing graph neural networks (GNNs) We propose a reinforcement learning agent, Reinforced Causal Explainer (RC-Explainer) RC-Explainer generates faithful and concise explanations, and has a better power to unseen graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-23T09:13:25Z)
• Towards Self-Explainable Graph Neural Network [24.18369781999988]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) generalize the deep neural networks to graph-structured data. GNNs lack explainability, which limits their adoption in scenarios that demand the transparency of models. We propose a new framework which can find $K$-nearest labeled nodes for each unlabeled node to give explainable node classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T22:45:11Z)
• On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph Explorations [48.56936527708657]
  We propose a novel method, known as SubgraphX, to explain graph neural networks (GNNs) Our work represents the first attempt to explain GNNs via identifying subgraphs explicitly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T22:12:26Z)
• Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural Network [49.79917262156429]
  We propose PGExplainer, a parameterized explainer for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) Compared to the existing work, PGExplainer has better generalization ability and can be utilized in an inductive setting easily. Experiments on both synthetic and real-life datasets show highly competitive performance with up to 24.7% relative improvement in AUC on explaining graph classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T17:15:03Z)
• Inverse Graph Identification: Can We Identify Node Labels Given Graph Labels? [89.13567439679709]
  Graph Identification (GI) has long been researched in graph learning and is essential in certain applications. This paper defines a novel problem dubbed Inverse Graph Identification (IGI) We propose a simple yet effective method that makes the node-level message passing process using Graph Attention Network (GAT) under the protocol of GI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-12T12:06:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.