Authenticity and exclusion: social media recommendation algorithms and the dynamics of belonging in professional networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.08552v1
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:36:58 GMT
- Title: Authenticity and exclusion: social media recommendation algorithms and the dynamics of belonging in professional networks
- Authors: Nil-Jana Akpinar, Sina Fazelpour,
- Abstract summary: Homophily profoundly influences social interactions, affecting associations, information disclosure, and the dynamics of social exchanges.
How might the nature and design of social media platforms, where different conversational contexts frequently collapse, impact these dynamics?
Our findings indicate a decline in the visibility of professional content generated by minority groups, a trend that is exacerbated over time by recommendation algorithms.
- Score: 0.8287206589886879
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Homophily - the attraction of similarity - profoundly influences social interactions, affecting associations, information disclosure, and the dynamics of social exchanges. Organizational studies reveal that when professional and personal boundaries overlap, individuals from minority backgrounds often encounter a dilemma between authenticity and inclusion due to these homophily-driven dynamics: if they disclose their genuine interests, they risk exclusion from the broader conversation. Conversely, to gain inclusion, they might feel pressured to assimilate. How might the nature and design of social media platforms, where different conversational contexts frequently collapse, and the recommender algorithms that are at the heart of these platforms, which can prioritize content based on network structure and historical user engagement, impact these dynamics? In this paper, we employ agent-based simulations to investigate this question. Our findings indicate a decline in the visibility of professional content generated by minority groups, a trend that is exacerbated over time by recommendation algorithms. Within these minority communities, users who closely resemble the majority group tend to receive greater visibility. We examine the philosophical and design implications of our results, discussing their relevance to questions of informational justice, inclusion, and the epistemic benefits of diversity.
Related papers
- The Illusion of Anonymity: Uncovering the Impact of User Actions on Privacy in Web3 Social Ecosystems [11.501563549824466]
We investigate the nuanced dynamics between user engagement on Web3 social platforms and the consequent privacy concerns.
We scrutinize the widespread phenomenon of fabricated activities, which encompasses the establishment of bogus accounts aimed at mimicking popularity.
We highlight the urgent need for more stringent privacy measures and ethical protocols to navigate the complex web of social exchanges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T06:26:15Z) - Recommendation Fairness in Social Networks Over Time [20.27386486425493]
We study the evolution of recommendation fairness over time and its relation to dynamic network properties.
Our results suggest that recommendation fairness improves over time, regardless of the recommendation method.
Two network properties, minority ratio, and homophily ratio, exhibit stable correlations with fairness over time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T19:03:23Z) - Modeling Political Orientation of Social Media Posts: An Extended
Analysis [0.0]
Developing machine learning models to characterize political polarization on online social media presents significant challenges.
These challenges mainly stem from various factors such as the lack of annotated data, presence of noise in social media datasets, and the sheer volume of data.
We introduce two methods that leverage on news media bias and post content to label social media posts.
We demonstrate that current machine learning models can exhibit improved performance in predicting political orientation of social media posts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-21T03:34:20Z) - Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph
with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics.
Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z) - Engagement, User Satisfaction, and the Amplification of Divisive Content
on Social Media [23.3201470123544]
We find that Twitter's engagement-based ranking algorithm amplifies emotionally charged, out-group hostile content that users say makes them feel worse about their political out-group.
We find that users do not prefer the political tweets selected by the algorithm, suggesting that the engagement-based algorithm underperforms in satisfying users' stated preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T13:57:30Z) - Along the Margins: Marginalized Communities' Ethical Concerns about
Social Platforms [3.357853336791203]
We identified marginalized communities' ethical concerns about social platforms.
Recent platform malfeasance indicates that software teams prioritize shareholder concerns over user concerns.
We found that marginalized communities' ethical concerns predominantly revolve around discrimination and misrepresentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-18T10:15:16Z) - Joint Multisided Exposure Fairness for Recommendation [76.75990595228666]
This paper formalizes a family of exposure fairness metrics that model the problem jointly from the perspective of both the consumers and producers.
Specifically, we consider group attributes for both types of stakeholders to identify and mitigate fairness concerns that go beyond individual users and items towards more systemic biases in recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-29T19:13:23Z) - Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of
Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past.
We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers.
These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment:
the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic.
We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content.
Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z) - I Know Where You Are Coming From: On the Impact of Social Media Sources
on AI Model Performance [79.05613148641018]
We will study the performance of different machine learning models when being learned on multi-modal data from different social networks.
Our initial experimental results reveal that social network choice impacts the performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-05T11:10:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.