Related papers: Unleashing Excellence through Inclusion: Navigating the Engagement-Performance Paradox

Related papers

Latent On-Policy Self-Distillation [55.57800223145407]
On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) offers an effective pathway by using a privileged self-teacher to provide dense supervision on the student's own trajectories.<n>Existing methods still rely heavily on designer-specified privileged artifacts.<n>We introduce Latent On-Policy Self-Distillation (LOPD), which makes the teacher's privileged context itself learnable end-to-end from experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-13T10:05:51Z)
"Nobody Did This": Contribution, Originality, and Accountability in Agent-Mediated Collaboration [24.416650940558437]
This workshop brings together researchers and practitioners to confront what we call contribution dissolution.<n>We argue that this dissolution begins before collaboration itself, in the individual worker's own uncertainty about what is genuinely theirs.<n>Our goal is to produce a shared research agenda and the foundations of an infrastructural response to contribution dissolution in collaborative knowledge work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-29T01:41:29Z)
Learning to Act under Noise: Enhancing Agent Robustness via Noisy Environments [68.02342920827135]
We propose NoisyAgent, an agentic training framework that explicitly incorporates environmental imperfections into the agent learning process.<n>We identify two major sources of interaction noise in real-world scenarios: user noise, which captures ambiguity and variability in user interaction, and tool noise, which reflects failures and anomalies in tool execution.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach consistently improves agent robustness under noisy and dynamic environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T16:02:00Z)
Position: Adopting AI in Practice Does Not Guarantee the Productivity Boost [3.109050918589247]
We argue that adopting AI in organizational practice does not guarantee productivity gains.<n>We identify five key moderating factors: human resource composition, baseline capability of individuals, learning curve of practitioners, incentives for fair use, and flexibility of objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-23T17:56:01Z)
Delegation and Verification Under AI [22.05784880098445]
We model delegation and verification as the solution to a rational worker's optimization problem.<n>We show that AI induces *phase transitions*, where arbitrarily small differences in verification ability lead to sharply different behaviors.<n>These results identify a structural mechanism by which AI reshapes institutional worker quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-03T13:14:23Z)
Completion $\ eq$ Collaboration: Scaling Collaborative Effort with Agents [48.95020665909723]
We argue for a shift from building and assessing task completion agents to developing collaborative agents.<n>We introduce collaborative effort scaling, a framework that captures how an agent's utility grows with increasing user involvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-29T17:47:18Z)
Diagnosing the Performance Trade-off in Moral Alignment: A Case Study on Gender Stereotypes [9.264601359430799]
Moral alignment has emerged as a widely adopted approach for regulating the behavior of pretrained language models.<n>Gender stereotype mitigation is a representational task within the broader application of moral alignment.<n>Prior studies commonly aim to achieve a performance trade-off by encouraging PLMs to selectively forget only stereotypical knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T19:26:00Z)
Enduring Disparities in the Workplace: A Pilot Study in the AI Community [3.4307685264019256]
We conducted a pilot survey of 1260 AI/ML professionals both in industry and academia across different axes.<n>Results indicate enduring disparities in workplace experiences for underrepresented and/or marginalized subgroups.<n>We highlight that accessibility remains an important challenge for a positive work environment and that disabled employees have a worse workplace experience than their non-disabled colleagues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T17:40:36Z)
Rationales Are Not Silver Bullets: Measuring the Impact of Rationales on Model Performance and Reliability [70.4107059502882]
Training language models with rationales augmentation has been shown to be beneficial in many existing works.<n>We conduct comprehensive investigations to thoroughly inspect the impact of rationales on model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T02:39:37Z)
Gap the (Theory of) Mind: Sharing Beliefs About Teammates' Goals Boosts Collaboration Perception, Not Performance [10.942993858770757]
We investigate whether an AI agent's ability to share its inferred understanding of a human teammate's goals can improve task performance and perceived collaboration.<n>We find that while goal-sharing information did not yield significant improvements in task performance or overall satisfaction scores, thematic analysis suggests that it supported strategic adaptations and subjective perceptions of collaboration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-06T16:15:24Z)
Fast Adaptation with Behavioral Foundation Models [82.34700481726951]
Unsupervised zero-shot reinforcement learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for pretraining behavioral foundation models. Despite promising results, zero-shot policies are often suboptimal due to errors induced by the unsupervised training process. We propose fast adaptation strategies that search in the low-dimensional task-embedding space of the pre-trained BFM to rapidly improve the performance of its zero-shot policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T16:14:17Z)
Dissecting Submission Limit in Desk-Rejections: A Mathematical Analysis of Fairness in AI Conference Policies [24.570596184292384]
We propose an optimization-based fairness-aware desk-rejection mechanism. We prove that optimizing individual fairness is NP-hard, whereas group fairness can be efficiently optimized via linear programming.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-02T06:29:23Z)
Employee Well-being in the Age of AI: Perceptions, Concerns, Behaviors, and Outcomes [0.0]
The study examines how AI shapes employee perceptions, job satisfaction, mental health, and retention. Transparency in AI systems emerges as a critical factor in fostering trust and positive employee attitudes. The research introduces an AI-employee well-being Interaction Framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T06:07:44Z)
Fairness in Algorithmic Recourse Through the Lens of Substantive Equality of Opportunity [15.78130132380848]
Algorithmic recourse has gained attention as a means of giving persons agency in their interactions with AI systems. Recent work has shown that recourse itself may be unfair due to differences in the initial circumstances of individuals. Time is a critical element in recourse because the longer it takes an individual to act, the more the setting may change.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T11:55:45Z)
Incentivized Communication for Federated Bandits [67.4682056391551]
We introduce an incentivized communication problem for federated bandits, where the server shall motivate clients to share data by providing incentives. We propose the first incentivized communication protocol, namely, Inc-FedUCB, that achieves near-optimal regret with provable communication and incentive cost guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-21T00:59:20Z)
Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Tasks [71.19560970717495]
Recent language models show impressive performance across a wide range of tasks. Are these skills general and transferable, or specialized to specific tasks seen during pretraining? We propose an evaluation framework based on "counterfactual" task variants that deviate from the default assumptions underlying standard tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T17:50:42Z)
Incentive Mechanism for Uncertain Tasks under Differential Privacy [17.058734221792964]
Mobile crowd sensing (MCS) has emerged as an increasingly popular sensing paradigm due to its cost-effectiveness. This paper presents HERALD*, an incentive mechanism that addresses issues through the use of uncertainty and hidden bids.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T10:15:02Z)
"How to make them stay?" -- Diverse Counterfactual Explanations of Employee Attrition [3.0839245814393728]
Employee attrition is an important and complex problem that can directly affect an organisation's competitiveness and performance. Machine learning (ML) has been applied in various aspects of human resource management. This paper proposes the use of counterfactual explanations focusing on multiple attrition cases from historical data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-08T13:54:57Z)
Long-term dynamics of fairness: understanding the impact of data-driven targeted help on job seekers [1.357291726431012]
We use an approach that combines statistics and machine learning to assess long-term fairness effects of labor market interventions. We develop and use a model to investigate the impact of decisions caused by a public employment authority that selectively supports job-seekers. We conclude that in order to quantify the trade-off correctly and to assess the long-term fairness effects of such a system in the real-world, careful modeling of the surrounding labor market is indispensable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-17T12:03:23Z)
Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Training [60.0947291284978]
Existing debiasing methods, such as adversarial training and removing protected information from representations, have been shown to reduce bias. We propose two novel training objectives which directly optimise for the widely-used criterion of it equal opportunity, and show that they are effective in reducing bias while maintaining high performance over two classification tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-05T01:57:58Z)
Aligning to Social Norms and Values in Interactive Narratives [89.82264844526333]
We focus on creating agents that act in alignment with socially beneficial norms and values in interactive narratives or text-based games. We introduce the GALAD agent that uses the social commonsense knowledge present in specially trained language models to contextually restrict its action space to only those actions that are aligned with socially beneficial values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T09:54:33Z)
Generative multitask learning mitigates target-causing confounding [61.21582323566118]
We propose a simple and scalable approach to causal representation learning for multitask learning. The improvement comes from mitigating unobserved confounders that cause the targets, but not the input. Our results on the Attributes of People and Taskonomy datasets reflect the conceptual improvement in robustness to prior probability shift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-08T20:42:14Z)
Measuring Fairness Under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A Quantification-Based Approach [131.20444904674494]
We tackle the problem of measuring group fairness under unawareness of sensitive attributes. We show that quantification approaches are particularly suited to tackle the fairness-under-unawareness problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-17T13:45:46Z)
Effects of Non-Cognitive Factors on Post-Secondary Persistence of Deaf Students: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach [0.0]
Post-secondary education persistence is the likelihood of a student remaining in post-secondary education. We consider four non-cognitive factors: having clear goals, social integration, social skills, and academic experience, which influence the departure decision of deaf students.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-22T21:11:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.