Numbers Matter! Bringing Quantity-awareness to Retrieval Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10283v1
• Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 17:56:11 GMT
• Title: Numbers Matter! Bringing Quantity-awareness to Retrieval Systems
• Authors: Satya Almasian, Milena Bruseva, Michael Gertz,
• Abstract summary: We introduce two quantity-aware ranking techniques designed to rank both the quantity and textual content either jointly or independently. These techniques incorporate quantity information in available retrieval systems and can address queries with numerical conditions equal, greater than, and less than. To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed models, we introduce two novel quantity-aware benchmark datasets in the domains of finance and medicine.
• Score: 5.7486903101353715
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantitative information plays a crucial role in understanding and interpreting the content of documents. Many user queries contain quantities and cannot be resolved without understanding their semantics, e.g., ``car that costs less than $10k''. Yet, modern search engines apply the same ranking mechanisms for both words and quantities, overlooking magnitude and unit information. In this paper, we introduce two quantity-aware ranking techniques designed to rank both the quantity and textual content either jointly or independently. These techniques incorporate quantity information in available retrieval systems and can address queries with numerical conditions equal, greater than, and less than. To evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed models, we introduce two novel quantity-aware benchmark datasets in the domains of finance and medicine and compare our method against various lexical and neural models. The code and data are available under https://github.com/satya77/QuantityAwareRankers.

Related papers

• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts. It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• SPIQA: A Dataset for Multimodal Question Answering on Scientific Papers [43.18330795060871]
  SPIQA is a dataset specifically designed to interpret complex figures and tables within the context of scientific research articles. We employ automatic and manual curation to create the dataset. SPIQA comprises 270K questions divided into training, validation, and three different evaluation splits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T16:37:59Z)
• LIST: Learning to Index Spatio-Textual Data for Embedding based Spatial Keyword Queries [53.843367588870585]
  List K-kNN spatial keyword queries (TkQs) return a list of objects based on a ranking function that considers both spatial and textual relevance. There are two key challenges in building an effective and efficient index, i.e., the absence of high-quality labels and the unbalanced results. We develop a novel pseudolabel generation technique to address the two challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T05:32:33Z)
• Bridging Research and Readers: A Multi-Modal Automated Academic Papers Interpretation System [47.13932723910289]
  We introduce an open-source multi-modal automated academic paper interpretation system (MMAPIS) with three-step process stages. It employs the hybrid modality preprocessing and alignment module to extract plain text, and tables or figures from documents separately. It then aligns this information based on the section names they belong to, ensuring that data with identical section names are categorized under the same section. It utilizes the extracted section names to divide the article into shorter text segments, facilitating specific summarizations both within and between sections via LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T11:50:53Z)
• Embrace Divergence for Richer Insights: A Multi-document Summarization Benchmark and a Case Study on Summarizing Diverse Information from News Articles [136.84278943588652]
  We propose a new task of summarizing diverse information encountered in multiple news articles encompassing the same event. To facilitate this task, we outlined a data collection schema for identifying diverse information and curated a dataset named DiverseSumm. The dataset includes 245 news stories, with each story comprising 10 news articles and paired with a human-validated reference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T20:28:17Z)
• CQE: A Comprehensive Quantity Extractor [2.2079886535603084]
  We present a comprehensive quantity extraction framework from text data. It efficiently detects combinations of values and units, the behavior of a quantity, and the concept a quantity is associated with. Our framework makes use of dependency parsing and a dictionary of units, and it provides for a proper normalization and standardization of detected quantities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T17:59:41Z)
• DAMO-NLP at SemEval-2023 Task 2: A Unified Retrieval-augmented System for Multilingual Named Entity Recognition [94.90258603217008]
  The MultiCoNER RNum2 shared task aims to tackle multilingual named entity recognition (NER) in fine-grained and noisy scenarios. Previous top systems in the MultiCoNER RNum1 either incorporate the knowledge bases or gazetteers. We propose a unified retrieval-augmented system (U-RaNER) for fine-grained multilingual NER.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T16:59:26Z)
• Exposing Query Identification for Search Transparency [69.06545074617685]
  We explore the feasibility of approximate exposing query identification (EQI) as a retrieval task by reversing the role of queries and documents in two classes of search systems. We derive an evaluation metric to measure the quality of a ranking of exposing queries, as well as conducting an empirical analysis focusing on various practical aspects of approximate EQI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T20:19:27Z)
• Online Learning of Optimally Diverse Rankings [63.62764375279861]
  We propose an algorithm that efficiently learns the optimal list based on users' feedback only. We show that after $T$ queries, the regret of LDR scales as $O((N-L)log(T))$ where $N$ is the number of all items.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T12:13:20Z)
• Extending Text Informativeness Measures to Passage Interestingness Evaluation (Language Model vs. Word Embedding) [1.2998637003026272]
  This paper defines the concept of Interestingness as a generalization of Informativeness. We then study the ability of state of the art Informativeness measures to cope with this generalization. We prove that the CLEF-INEX Tweet Contextualization 2012 Logarithm Similarity measure provides best results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-14T18:22:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.