The Life Cycle of Large Language Models: A Review of Biases in Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11203v1
• Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:00:28 GMT
• Title: The Life Cycle of Large Language Models: A Review of Biases in Education
• Authors: Jinsook Lee, Yann Hicke, Renzhe Yu, Christopher Brooks, René F. Kizilcec,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in educational contexts to provide personalized support to students and teachers. The integration of LLMs in education technology has renewed concerns over algorithmic bias which may exacerbate educational inequities. This review aims to clarify the complex nature of bias in LLM applications and provide practical guidance for their evaluation to promote educational equity.
• Score: 3.8757867335422485
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in educational contexts to provide personalized support to students and teachers. The unprecedented capacity of LLM-based applications to understand and generate natural language can potentially improve instructional effectiveness and learning outcomes, but the integration of LLMs in education technology has renewed concerns over algorithmic bias which may exacerbate educational inequities. In this review, building on prior work on mapping the traditional machine learning life cycle, we provide a holistic map of the LLM life cycle from the initial development of LLMs to customizing pre-trained models for various applications in educational settings. We explain each step in the LLM life cycle and identify potential sources of bias that may arise in the context of education. We discuss why current measures of bias from traditional machine learning fail to transfer to LLM-generated content in education, such as tutoring conversations because the text is high-dimensional, there can be multiple correct responses, and tailoring responses may be pedagogically desirable rather than unfair. This review aims to clarify the complex nature of bias in LLM applications and provide practical guidance for their evaluation to promote educational equity.

Related papers

• Towards Pedagogical LLMs with Supervised Fine Tuning for Computing Education [44.17741997623522]
  This paper investigates supervised fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) to improve their pedagogical alignment in computing education. The project utilised a proprietary dataset of 2,500 high quality question/answer pairs from programming course forums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T03:20:00Z)
• AutoTutor meets Large Language Models: A Language Model Tutor with Rich Pedagogy and Guardrails [43.19453208130667]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have found several use cases in education, ranging from automatic question generation to essay evaluation. In this paper, we explore the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to author Intelligent Tutoring Systems. We create a sample end-to-end tutoring system named MWPTutor, which uses LLMs to fill in the state space of a pre-defined finite state transducer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T14:53:56Z)
• Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [85.92660644100582]
  We explore machine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs) This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T20:51:58Z)
• History, Development, and Principles of Large Language Models-An Introductory Survey [15.875687167037206]
  Language models serve as a cornerstone in natural language processing (NLP) Over extensive research spanning decades, language modeling has progressed from initial statistical language models (SLMs) to the contemporary landscape of large language models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T01:18:15Z)
• Learning to Generate Explainable Stock Predictions using Self-Reflective Large Language Models [54.21695754082441]
  We propose a framework to teach Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate explainable stock predictions. A reflective agent learns how to explain past stock movements through self-reasoning, while the PPO trainer trains the model to generate the most likely explanations. Our framework can outperform both traditional deep-learning and LLM methods in prediction accuracy and Matthews correlation coefficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T03:18:58Z)
• Continual Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey [95.79977915131145]
  Large language models (LLMs) are not amenable to frequent re-training, due to high training costs arising from their massive scale. This paper surveys recent works on continual learning for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T12:34:09Z)
• Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks. The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z)
• Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z)
• Democratizing Reasoning Ability: Tailored Learning from Large Language Model [97.4921006089966]
  We propose a tailored learning approach to distill such reasoning ability to smaller LMs. We exploit the potential of LLM as a reasoning teacher by building an interactive multi-round learning paradigm. To exploit the reasoning potential of the smaller LM, we propose self-reflection learning to motivate the student to learn from self-made mistakes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T07:50:10Z)
• Prototyping the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for adult learning content creation at scale [0.6628807224384127]
  This paper presents an investigation into the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in asynchronous course creation. We developed a course prototype leveraging an LLM, implementing a robust human-in-the-loop process. Initial findings indicate that taking this approach can indeed facilitate faster content creation without compromising on accuracy or clarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T10:58:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.