Search Engines, LLMs or Both? Evaluating Information Seeking Strategies for Answering Health Questions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12468v2
• Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 10:11:09 GMT
• Title: Search Engines, LLMs or Both? Evaluating Information Seeking Strategies for Answering Health Questions
• Authors: Marcos Fernández-Pichel, Juan C. Pichel, David E. Losada,
• Abstract summary: We compare different web search engines, Large Language Models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented (RAG) approaches. We observed that the quality of webpages potentially responding to a health question does not decline as we navigate further down the ranked lists. According to our evaluation, web engines are less accurate than LLMs in finding correct answers to health questions.
• Score: 3.8984586307450093
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Search engines have traditionally served as primary tools for information seeking. However, the new Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multiple tasks and, specifically, their adoption as question answering systems is becoming increasingly prevalent. It is expected that LLM-based conversational systems and traditional web engines will continue to coexist in the future, supporting end users in various ways. But there is a need for more scientific research on the effectiveness of both types of systems in facilitating accurate information seeking. In this study, we focus on their merits in answering health questions. We conducted an extensive study comparing different web search engines, LLMs and retrieval-augmented (RAG) approaches. Our research reveals intriguing conclusions. For example, we observed that the quality of webpages potentially responding to a health question does not decline as we navigate further down the ranked lists. However, according to our evaluation, web engines are less accurate than LLMs in finding correct answers to health questions. On the other hand, LLMs are quite sensitive to the input prompts, and we also found out that RAG leads to highly effective information seeking methods.

Related papers

• The Extractive-Abstractive Spectrum: Uncovering Verifiability Trade-offs in LLM Generations [40.498553309980764]
  We study the interplay between verifiability and utility of information-sharing tools. We find that users prefer search engines over large language models for high-stakes queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T12:34:52Z)
• Search Engines in an AI Era: The False Promise of Factual and Verifiable Source-Cited Responses [32.49468716515915]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based applications are graduating from research prototypes to products serving millions of users. A prominent example is the appearance of Answer Engines: LLM-based generative search engines supplanting traditional search engines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T00:50:31Z)
• When Search Engine Services meet Large Language Models: Visions and Challenges [53.32948540004658]
  This paper conducts an in-depth examination of how integrating Large Language Models with search engines can mutually benefit both technologies. We focus on two main areas: using search engines to improve LLMs (Search4LLM) and enhancing search engine functions using LLMs (LLM4Search)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T03:52:13Z)
• Ranking Manipulation for Conversational Search Engines [7.958276719131612]
  We study the impact of prompt injections on the ranking order of sources referenced by conversational search engines. We present a tree-of-attacks-based jailbreaking technique which reliably promotes low-ranked products.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T19:14:21Z)
• CLARINET: Augmenting Language Models to Ask Clarification Questions for Retrieval [52.134133938779776]
  We present CLARINET, a system that asks informative clarification questions by choosing questions whose answers would maximize certainty in the correct candidate. Our approach works by augmenting a large language model (LLM) to condition on a retrieval distribution, finetuning end-to-end to generate the question that would have maximized the rank of the true candidate at each turn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T18:21:31Z)
• Small Models, Big Insights: Leveraging Slim Proxy Models To Decide When and What to Retrieve for LLMs [60.40396361115776]
  This paper introduces a novel collaborative approach, namely SlimPLM, that detects missing knowledge in large language models (LLMs) with a slim proxy model. We employ a proxy model which has far fewer parameters, and take its answers as answers. Heuristic answers are then utilized to predict the knowledge required to answer the user question, as well as the known and unknown knowledge within the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T11:11:08Z)
• FreshLLMs: Refreshing Large Language Models with Search Engine Augmentation [92.43001160060376]
  We study the factuality of large language models (LLMs) in the context of answering questions that test current world knowledge. We introduce FreshQA, a novel dynamic QA benchmark encompassing a diverse range of question and answer types. We benchmark a diverse array of both closed and open-source LLMs under a two-mode evaluation procedure that allows us to measure both correctness and hallucination. Motivated by these results, we present FreshPrompt, a simple few-shot prompting method that substantially boosts the performance of an LLM on FreshQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T00:04:12Z)
• How Can Recommender Systems Benefit from Large Language Models: A Survey [82.06729592294322]
  Large language models (LLM) have shown impressive general intelligence and human-like capabilities. We conduct a comprehensive survey on this research direction from the perspective of the whole pipeline in real-world recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T11:31:50Z)
• Synergistic Interplay between Search and Large Language Models for Information Retrieval [141.18083677333848]
  InteR allows RMs to expand knowledge in queries using LLM-generated knowledge collections. InteR achieves overall superior zero-shot retrieval performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T11:58:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.